Because Princesses and formality. Also, while they both wear heels, I don't think they're that massively high for no reason. And, hey, it's not like they haven't been wearing their heels from the beginning, unlike Samus, who stomps around in boots.lord canti said:So why isn't any body complaining about peach and zelda kicking ass in heels? or is this just about how badly they stick out?
i shouldnt have called him names, regardless its not the high heels, which i agree are out of place, but his criticism of the zero suit itself, which honestly are getting ridiculous, are women now not allowed to show any part of her body for any reasn whatsoever?erttheking said:You lose credibility when you open your argument with name calling. Also a worse example? How is the addition of high heels to a suit that she is supposed to wear while interfacing with her power armor for no logical reason other than she is a woman and high heels are attractive NOT an example of sexism? And the rocket boots aren't a good justification, because as I said in an earlier post, Haloid managed to make more respectable rocket boots than that, and that ended with a sexy dance!NuclearKangaroo said:why am i losing my time with a social justice warrior? believe what you want, but let me tell you, theres no reason for kratos to not wear any sort of armor either, or atleast a t-shirt an some pants
im sure theres sexism in gaming, there is in every other media as well, but you couldnt have picked a worse example
also i literally cant see her ass in OP's image, in fact as a male i find this outrageous, im gonna tell the patriarchy!
The idea of her fighting in zero suit when she has a much better alternative seems dumb to me, but I know why it was included.mecegirl said:The zero suit never bothered me. Some sort of under armor would be needed for her suit and it looks like it would work better than the two pieces she has been depicted in in the past. The poses that they put her in are randomly sexulized at times though.
As for the heels, always a bad idea for a chracter of her type. They are also ugly as sin.
http://www.smashbros.com/us/characters/zelda.htmllord canti said:So why isn't any body complaining about peach and zelda kicking ass in heels? or is this just about how badly they stick out?
Functional? In what way? They push the ankle and all your lower leg tendons into very unnatural positions and shifts your center of balance, and after a while can cause debilitating pain when wearing normal footwear.wackymon said:Sorry, I don't know why I did that. I'll just say that the heels are really freaking annoying, though somewhat functional. Now I'll just show myself out in shame.
He isn't criticizing the design for it simply being sexualized, he is criticizing it for being sexualized and it making no sense at all within the context of the suit and clashing with the tone of the Metroid universe and that is the problem with so many instances of sexualizes characters. The characters of RWBY are sexualized, but it works, why? Because it fits with the tone of the RWBY universe. Bayonetta is sexualized, but it works, why? Because it fits with the overall goofy nature of her world and the sexually dominant nature of her personality. Poison Ivy is sexualized, but it works, why? Because her approach to problems involves seducing men and therefore it would make sense that she dresses skimpily. Samus having high heels when she is a professional career bounty hunter in a consistently serious setting where no one else dresses like that makes no sense whatsoever. THAT is what is pissing people off.NuclearKangaroo said:i shouldnt have called him names, regardless its not the high heels, which i agree are out of place, but his criticism of the zero suit itself, which honestly are getting ridiculous, are women now not allowed to show any part of her body for any reasn whatsoever?erttheking said:You lose credibility when you open your argument with name calling. Also a worse example? How is the addition of high heels to a suit that she is supposed to wear while interfacing with her power armor for no logical reason other than she is a woman and high heels are attractive NOT an example of sexism? And the rocket boots aren't a good justification, because as I said in an earlier post, Haloid managed to make more respectable rocket boots than that, and that ended with a sexy dance!NuclearKangaroo said:why am i losing my time with a social justice warrior? believe what you want, but let me tell you, theres no reason for kratos to not wear any sort of armor either, or atleast a t-shirt an some pants
im sure theres sexism in gaming, there is in every other media as well, but you couldnt have picked a worse example
also i literally cant see her ass in OP's image, in fact as a male i find this outrageous, im gonna tell the patriarchy!
that the kind of attitude that really annoys me
specially when the same rule doesnt seem to apply to men
Occasionally Peach does fight in her world, and your right about Zelda, so I give you that. Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Samus double jump ability come from her jet pack and not her boots? Anyway I do agree the attachments are ugly as hell, but why are we trying to bring reality into a fighting game where you can lay a dinosaur who walks upright, a ninja frog, and an anthropomorphic fox with bionic legs. Though I guess it is more about it not fitting with her character.Snotnarok said:Peach doesn't fight in her world, also she's a cartoon that abides by that logic example: Floating with skirt, taking bricks to the head that shrink her down in size, mushrooms increasing size.lord canti said:So why isn't any body complaining about peach and zelda kicking ass in heels? or is this just about how badly they stick out?
Zelda is an archer and mage, not fighting with melee, when she does fight with melee she changed to Sheek if you recall, a character not wearing heels.
OT:
I just wanted to mention on other sites, I've gotten a lot of either flack or excuses being made for heels, including, but not limited to:
-Calvery wear heels
-Raiden and Chell wear heels and kick ass
-They're rocket heels increasing her mobility
Despite not mentioning anything about the subject, I got a lot of people pushing that "it's not objectifying women" so there's a lot of people pushing excuses so hard they're projecting arguments that were never posed.
Here's what I posed to them, and anyone who defends the heels:
Can you, in anyway tell me any advantage she has with these heels over salvaging her boots from her power armor? They're preequipped with double/higher jumping, are made of metal and can kick harder, and don't have the negative effects of heels: Lower grip, higher risk of breaking an ankle, lower balance.
http://th01.deviantart.net/fs71/PRE/i/2014/100/0/5/zero_suit_samus_minus_stupid_heels_by_gx3rcomics-d7dxo38.jpg
Rendered by me because I'm sick and felt inclined.
Probably because she isn't wearing those heels underneath the suit? I mean, those heels are clearly not part of the Zero Suit as you can see the Suit's actual foot within those Jet Heels. Plus, since Samus and Zero Suit Samus are different characters now, she could easily be wearing the heels just as Zero Suit Samus.tippy2k2 said:I don't know where Zero Suit came from so I could be wrong here but...
Zero Suit is what she wears underneath her regular armor, correct?
Could someone explain how that giant spike of a heel fits into this footing?
![]()
Unless her foot is made out of a jelly-fish like material for easy collapsing, I'm not sure how her new stripper heel is fitting. There's a minor heel in the suit but there's no way that her giant spike is fitting in that thing...
Oh, well then I can admit when I'm wrong so touche.xyrafhoan said:http://www.smashbros.com/us/characters/zelda.htmllord canti said:So why isn't any body complaining about peach and zelda kicking ass in heels? or is this just about how badly they stick out?
Zelda doesn't wear heels.
Anyway, I see why people object to Samus's high heels due to how it fundamentally betrays her original design notes, I personally object to them because she doesn't even *walk* properly in those heels. She does some awkward crab shuffle. Not to mention the heel itself is placed wrong. It's overall badly designed.
Pretty much, yes.lord canti said:is this just about how badly they stick out?
But super smash bros is an incredibly goofy game. I would understand if people were getting pissed if these things were in a legitimate metroid game, but they're not. They are part of a fighting game that has nothing to do with the canon of the series.erttheking said:He isn't criticizing the design for it simply being sexualized, he is criticizing it for being sexualized and it making no sense at all within the context of the suit and clashing with the tone of the Metroid universe and that is the problem with so many instances of sexualizes characters. The characters of RWBY are sexualized, but it works, why? Because it fits with the tone of the RWBY universe. Bayonetta is sexualized, but it works, why? Because it fits with the overall goofy nature of her world and the sexually dominant nature of her personality. Poison Ivy is sexualized, but it works, why? Because her approach to problems involves seducing men and therefore it would make sense that she dresses skimpily. Samus having high heels when she is a professional career bounty hunter in a consistently serious setting where no one else dresses like that makes no sense whatsoever. THAT is what is pissing people off.NuclearKangaroo said:i shouldnt have called him names, regardless its not the high heels, which i agree are out of place, but his criticism of the zero suit itself, which honestly are getting ridiculous, are women now not allowed to show any part of her body for any reasn whatsoever?erttheking said:You lose credibility when you open your argument with name calling. Also a worse example? How is the addition of high heels to a suit that she is supposed to wear while interfacing with her power armor for no logical reason other than she is a woman and high heels are attractive NOT an example of sexism? And the rocket boots aren't a good justification, because as I said in an earlier post, Haloid managed to make more respectable rocket boots than that, and that ended with a sexy dance!NuclearKangaroo said:why am i losing my time with a social justice warrior? believe what you want, but let me tell you, theres no reason for kratos to not wear any sort of armor either, or atleast a t-shirt an some pants
im sure theres sexism in gaming, there is in every other media as well, but you couldnt have picked a worse example
also i literally cant see her ass in OP's image, in fact as a male i find this outrageous, im gonna tell the patriarchy!
that the kind of attitude that really annoys me
specially when the same rule doesnt seem to apply to men
I'd still say that's a really weak reason to be that mad. Especially since its just heels. At the end of the day, I'd chalk this up to stupid costumes decisions, not a betray of the character itself. Why? Well first off, Metroid does have certain fan-service things since the beginning of the series. Metroid, Metroid II, and Super Metroid put Samus in a bikini if you put the game fast enough. Super Metroid and Metroid Fussion originally had Samus nude when she died. Yet, its because she wears high heels that NOW she's being portrayed as sexy? Heck, considering the last game Zero Suit Samus starred in, I'd say that this game does her much more justice. Like, did everyone forget Brawl's intro pic to Zero Suit Samus?erttheking said:He isn't criticizing the design for it simply being sexualized, he is criticizing it for being sexualized and it making no sense at all within the context of the suit and clashing with the tone of the Metroid universe and that is the problem with so many instances of sexualizes characters. The characters of RWBY are sexualized, but it works, why? Because it fits with the tone of the RWBY universe. Bayonetta is sexualized, but it works, why? Because it fits with the overall goofy nature of her world and the sexually dominant nature of her personality. Poison Ivy is sexualized, but it works, why? Because her approach to problems involves seducing men and therefore it would make sense that she dresses skimpily. Samus having high heels when she is a professional career bounty hunter in a consistently serious setting where no one else dresses like that makes no sense whatsoever. THAT is what is pissing people off.
I would've considered that a valid explanation if it wasn't for the fact the first three smash bros games managed to get by without giving Samus high heels and this one doesn't feel the need to be giving any of the other female characters high heels, or sexualizing any of the male characters in anyway. Heck, even the Zero Suit introduced in Brawl managed to get by with her having realistic looking shoes.lord canti said:But super smash bros is an incredibly goofy game. I would understand if people were getting pissed if these things were in a legitimate metroid game, but they're not. They are part of a fighting game that has nothing to do with the canon of the series.erttheking said:He isn't criticizing the design for it simply being sexualized, he is criticizing it for being sexualized and it making no sense at all within the context of the suit and clashing with the tone of the Metroid universe and that is the problem with so many instances of sexualizes characters. The characters of RWBY are sexualized, but it works, why? Because it fits with the tone of the RWBY universe. Bayonetta is sexualized, but it works, why? Because it fits with the overall goofy nature of her world and the sexually dominant nature of her personality. Poison Ivy is sexualized, but it works, why? Because her approach to problems involves seducing men and therefore it would make sense that she dresses skimpily. Samus having high heels when she is a professional career bounty hunter in a consistently serious setting where no one else dresses like that makes no sense whatsoever. THAT is what is pissing people off.NuclearKangaroo said:i shouldnt have called him names, regardless its not the high heels, which i agree are out of place, but his criticism of the zero suit itself, which honestly are getting ridiculous, are women now not allowed to show any part of her body for any reasn whatsoever?erttheking said:You lose credibility when you open your argument with name calling. Also a worse example? How is the addition of high heels to a suit that she is supposed to wear while interfacing with her power armor for no logical reason other than she is a woman and high heels are attractive NOT an example of sexism? And the rocket boots aren't a good justification, because as I said in an earlier post, Haloid managed to make more respectable rocket boots than that, and that ended with a sexy dance!NuclearKangaroo said:why am i losing my time with a social justice warrior? believe what you want, but let me tell you, theres no reason for kratos to not wear any sort of armor either, or atleast a t-shirt an some pants
im sure theres sexism in gaming, there is in every other media as well, but you couldnt have picked a worse example
also i literally cant see her ass in OP's image, in fact as a male i find this outrageous, im gonna tell the patriarchy!
that the kind of attitude that really annoys me
specially when the same rule doesnt seem to apply to men
Nintendo already beat you to it!Nowhere Man said:I can't help but think that Nintendo is just pandering to male audiences now with Samus and wouldn't be surprised if in a few years they changed her design to expose her midriff, gave her a skirt and added a plunging neckline Chozo armor be damned.