It's more the "woman in power" thing, which pisses me right off in this circumstance.Obtusifolius said:Good post.
Do people really think she's a feminist though? I'm British so I don't know as much about her as an American might.
It's more the "woman in power" thing, which pisses me right off in this circumstance.Obtusifolius said:Good post.
Do people really think she's a feminist though? I'm British so I don't know as much about her as an American might.
Because, heaven forbid, (religious reference in a Palin thread, 0_o whoda thunkit) a "woman in power" have differing opinions from yourself. Now granted, I'm not saying don't hate her, you're entitled to your views, but are you really justified in attacking the fact that she has risen to a place of power of her own merits? Even if you disagree with someone's stance on subjects, I would think that you would be happy to see any type of progress on that front.Labyrinth said:It's more the "woman in power" thing, which pisses me right off in this circumstance.Obtusifolius said:Good post.
Do people really think she's a feminist though? I'm British so I don't know as much about her as an American might.
The problem I have with Palin is that despite everything, she still represents "Traditional Values". Think of Thatcher too. It's the "Hockey Mom with $500 outfits because her appearance IS EVERYTHINGGG!!!111oneoneone", the idiocy of her, that kind of thing. Do I discredit her political capacity? Oh there's no doubt of that, mostly because I dislike slime in politics.Borrowed Time said:*snip*
So you dislike politics then?Labyrinth said:Oh there's no doubt of that, mostly because I dislike slime in politics.
Borrowed Time said:Because, heaven forbid, (religious reference in a Palin thread, 0_o whoda thunkit) a "woman in power" have differing opinions from yourself. Now granted, I'm not saying don't hate her, you're entitled to your views, but are you really justified in attacking the fact that she has risen to a place of power of her own merits? Even if you disagree with someone's stance on subjects, I would think that you would be happy to see any type of progress on that front.Labyrinth said:It's more the "woman in power" thing, which pisses me right off in this circumstance.Obtusifolius said:Good post.
Do people really think she's a feminist though? I'm British so I don't know as much about her as an American might.
Even if I don't agree with every aspect of Obama's points of view, I'm glad that we've been able to look past race and elect someone who'se not the stereotypical "old, white guy". Although at the same time I believe that race in fact played a part in his election, considering my son's 4th grade teacher flat out told her class that she voted for him because he's "black". I didn't make that crap up. -_-;
Anyway, as I was saying, hate her all you want, but at least give her some credit where credit is due. Not being able to swallow your own pride and recognize someone's accomplishments just because you dislike (ok maybe that's too nice of a word) them makes you no better then the one you hate. (yes I'm so about to go down the Hitler route. It's not because I'm making a direct comparison of Hitler to anyone, but I'm just using this as an example of how blind rage, if even for justified reasons, can retard your own way of thinking.) Though Hitler was, as most of us can agree, a "very bad man", he really did help bring Germany out of an economic bottomless pit. He did a lot of things for Germany that were in fact good. Not to mention that in some cases he was a strategic genious. Does that change the fact that he was a mass murderer and did some of the most deplorable things in history? Hell no. Can we learn from him still? Yes, yes I think we can.
Lolz, don't know where you heard about the embezzlement thing, but its simply a rumor.kaneisfeelingable said:I don?t think that I?ve seen this yet but Sarah Palin resigned yesterday and there are rumors of an impending federal indictment for embezzlement. Just wanted to know what you think about that?
Wow, you really don't look at much other than liberal media do you? I'm sorry but becoming a governor, even in Alaska, isn't a cake walk. So, McCain didn't pick her solely for hype, but because you know, she actual knows how to be an executive, unlike a senator, who only knows how to ramble.historybuff said:Borrowed Time said:Because, heaven forbid, (religious reference in a Palin thread, 0_o whoda thunkit) a "woman in power" have differing opinions from yourself. Now granted, I'm not saying don't hate her, you're entitled to your views, but are you really justified in attacking the fact that she has risen to a place of power of her own merits? Even if you disagree with someone's stance on subjects, I would think that you would be happy to see any type of progress on that front.Labyrinth said:It's more the "woman in power" thing, which pisses me right off in this circumstance.Obtusifolius said:Good post.
Do people really think she's a feminist though? I'm British so I don't know as much about her as an American might.
Even if I don't agree with every aspect of Obama's points of view, I'm glad that we've been able to look past race and elect someone who'se not the stereotypical "old, white guy". Although at the same time I believe that race in fact played a part in his election, considering my son's 4th grade teacher flat out told her class that she voted for him because he's "black". I didn't make that crap up. -_-;
Anyway, as I was saying, hate her all you want, but at least give her some credit where credit is due. Not being able to swallow your own pride and recognize someone's accomplishments just because you dislike (ok maybe that's too nice of a word) them makes you no better then the one you hate. (yes I'm so about to go down the Hitler route. It's not because I'm making a direct comparison of Hitler to anyone, but I'm just using this as an example of how blind rage, if even for justified reasons, can retard your own way of thinking.) Though Hitler was, as most of us can agree, a "very bad man", he really did help bring Germany out of an economic bottomless pit. He did a lot of things for Germany that were in fact good. Not to mention that in some cases he was a strategic genious. Does that change the fact that he was a mass murderer and did some of the most deplorable things in history? Hell no. Can we learn from him still? Yes, yes I think we can.
Her own merit? What? What merit? McCain picked her because Obama was so wildly popular and he thought that by selecting an attractive woman, he'd appeal to more people by appearing progressive. It ended up being a huge mistake for him. So. What merit?
You getting all self-righteous about her just comes across as obnoxious. And then pulling the Hitler card? Really?
Hehehe. I dislike the people more than the ideal.ace_of_something said:So you dislike politics then?Labyrinth said:Oh there's no doubt of that, mostly because I dislike slime in politics.
*badumching*
How does you having a problem with her representing "Traditional Values", for reasons neither you nor I can truly explain, besides sheer stupidity, why she still represents those, deminish the fact that she's actually governed a state and from some people's point of view, done a half decent job of it? I'm not defending her that she'd make a good Veep, oh hell no. I am defending her achieving the seat she was already in though.Labyrinth said:The problem I have with Palin is that despite everything, she still represents "Traditional Values". Think of Thatcher too. It's the "Hockey Mom with $500 outfits because her appearance IS EVERYTHINGGG!!!111oneoneone", the idiocy of her, that kind of thing. Do I discredit her political capacity? Oh there's no doubt of that, mostly because I dislike slime in politics.Borrowed Time said:*snip*