Science Suggests We're Living in the Matrix

Recommended Videos

The_Waspman

New member
Sep 14, 2011
569
0
0
I'm calling bullshit on this.

If videogames have tought me anything its that you cant even enter a building without a fucking loading screen.

No loading screens in real life? Well then its not a fucking simulation, is it?
 

Korzack

New member
Apr 28, 2010
173
0
0
^Maybe we're all playing on hardcore mode, Waspman... Or a Really bade port, one of the two
 

ShAmMz0r

New member
Oct 20, 2011
25
0
0
Bobic said:
I've always thought the whole Observer Effect (specifically relating to quantum physics) was evidence that we were living in a simulation. The fact that things only choose values (i.e. exist in a defined way) when we observe them. So if no-one is looking, things don't exist. Sounds an awful lot like they're saving on processing power to me.
It always amazes me how people insist on making it sound like only a concious agent can be an observer in quantum measurement. This notion is in fact wrong and I implore you not to confuse public further on this matter. We get enough stuff like "What the bleep do we know" as it is.
Bobic said:
From Wiki:

A key topic is that of wave function collapse, for which some interpretations assert that measurement causes a discontinuous change into a non-quantum state, which no longer evolves. The superposition principle (ψ = Σanψn) of quantum physics says that for a wave function ψ, a measurement will give a state of the quantum system of one of the m possible eigenvalues fn, n=1,2...m, of the operator which is part of the eigenfunctions ψn, n=1,2,...n. Once we have measured the system, we know its current state and this stops it from being in one of its other states.[1] This means that the type of measurement that we do on the system affects the end state of the system. An experimentally studied situation related to this is the quantum Zeno effect, in which a quantum state that would decay if left alone but does not decay because of its continuous observation.

Or, in none baffling science terms:

Quantum systems exist as what is known as a probability density (i.e. a system of possibilities, rather than something specific). Observation makes it pick one of these possibilities, and become defined. Therefore Keanu Reeves will lead us to salvation.
This actually raises an interesting point. There are several serious problems with the process of wave function collapse in quantum theory and the only interpretations that avoid these problems involve multiple universes in one way or another, so existence of quantum effects in our universe actually means that we most likely are not in a simulation. Imagine how much computing power it would take to continually simulate a universe which basically makes a slightly different copy of itself every time a quantum state inside it loses coherence. Then you have to keep track of both copies and the copies they will generate and so on. And that's only to simulate one layer in nested structure. Imagine that every copy is running a similar simulation itself. I think that a civilisation that has such computing power would be able to find a more useful way of using it.
 

MrFalconfly

New member
Sep 5, 2011
913
0
0
The_Waspman said:
I'm calling bullshit on this.

If videogames have tought me anything its that you cant even enter a building without a fucking loading screen.

No loading screens in real life? Well then its not a fucking simulation, is it?
Well maybe not a simulation.

But string-theory suggests that everything we see is a giant hologram (it's called the holographic principle and it basically states that everything we see is a 3D holographic representation of 2D information stored on the "surface" of the universe, it's basically how we think Black Holes operate).
 

ascorbius

Numberwanger
Nov 18, 2009
263
0
0
The_Waspman said:
I'm calling bullshit on this.

If videogames have tought me anything its that you cant even enter a building without a fucking loading screen.

No loading screens in real life? Well then its not a fucking simulation, is it?
Think about it, If there were loading screens, you wouldn't see them - your simulation would be paused while more data is loaded. Only those who made the simulation would notice anything happening at all.
Actually, you'd be experiencing time at a completely different rate to what the creators of the simulation were.

I've thought about this before 13th floor kind-of gave me the nudge..

Consider this: we continue to make advances in science, things are becoming more complex from what we remember growing up - It stands to reason that there is a chance that this is because they keep upgrading the simulation machine and over time it can handle more levels of detail, just like most of us do with our PCs.. We're just in something like a massively complex CryEngine or something like that. We don't notice the upgrade because they pause the simulation for perform them.

And if it was God who crated the simulation, think about this... what happens to computer programs on your PC when you close them down? Do their souls go to your hard drive? No, they stop running and the memory they allocated is used by something else... They never spill out onto your desk. They can never leave the digital world.

There is no afterlife if this is a simulation... Even if there is a God, you're going to heaven no more than Gordon Freeman will - and we like Gordon Freeman - He does noble work. When we close Half-Life, Gordon Freeman ceases to exist in memory and remains only on your hard drive as a set of instructions needed to create Gordon Freeman the next time you want to play.

Also, if this is a simulation, there is no free will as we're set on a pre-programmed path where our actions are based on stimulus and reaction - It's just so complex we perceive it as free will. Think about it, when was the last time you made a truly independent decision which wasn't based on outside factors or a learned response to some other stimulus?
 

Saltyk

Sane among the insane.
Sep 12, 2010
16,755
0
0
I think a lot of people are reading this as, according to this theory we're plugged into the Matrix right now. But I'd say that if a civilization were to create a super advanced simulation of the universe, it would be populated with bits of data and artificial intelligence. So, you're not a person with a metal spike in your skull. You're data.

Is this the secret of reality? I doubt it. But it is an interesting idea.
 

Subscriptism

New member
May 5, 2012
256
0
0
Please be careful with your use of the word "science". Just because a scientist said it doesn't make it science.
 

The Funslinger

Corporate Splooge
Sep 12, 2010
6,145
0
0
TimeLord said:
So who's our Neo?
Me, quite obviously.

I break all the rules.

On a more serious note, isn't this Descartes' three levels of doubt all jazzed up with science?
 

DoomyMcDoom

New member
Jul 4, 2008
1,410
0
0
I see people wigged out by this, why would it be scary if it were true?

Honestly, life is a meaningless void we ourselves funnel meaning into to please ourselves into an altered mental state to avoid feelings of pointlessness and depression...

So why would knowing that we are in fact nothing more than an experiment be any different, at least this way maybe we are serving a purpose somehow, shouldn't that at least be comforting to think of?

I would also like to pose some advice to those who struggle with stress and worry, if you cannot control something, prevent something, or do anything about something, simply don't bother worrying/thinking about it, because honestly, the only thing anyone can be certain of is that we all gotta die sometime, and other than suicide, we can't even control that, so why worry about something we only hypothesize might be how things are, hell we know next to nothing concrete about the universe in which we live as it stands, so any speculation towards the reasons for it's existence and the means by which it came to be, is a rather silly thing to feel stress or anxiety over, all that does is detract from a person's overall enjoyment of this limited existence we all share.
 

DudeistBelieve

TellEmSteveDave.com
Sep 9, 2010
4,768
1
0
Sonic Doctor said:
Yup, I thought so. To all the non-believers, God does exist. It's just that the world is just one big game of The Sims to him.
...And that bastard just took away our pool ladder. THE FUCK?!?!
 

theSteamSupported

New member
Mar 4, 2012
245
0
0
Ferisar said:
Magic and and purpose don't factor in here. Magic is a broad brush-stroke. If this "simulation" contains nothing that would be interpreted as magic, then there will be no magic. This isn't a novel written by some random person, it would have to be a precise set of systems which all function together. It's more like... everything is magic, but comes from somewhere.
Maybe magic was the wrong word. I think I should have meant usage of the debug engine. Just type in a specific cheat code, and suddenly certain objects can disobey gravity, go through walls or instantly clone themselves without any negative repercussions.

Purpose is an obvious no-no. Even basic functions don't serve any purpose when just scattered around a sheet. It's the very definition of sandbox.
Except sandboxes do serve a clear purpose, exploration. Just because it's open ended, doesn't mean it lacks purpose. Most simulations do have open ends in order to come up with new results.

Also, who's to say entropy is not a purpose?
If our universe really was a simulation, then yes, I'd say enthropy would be the purpose. I.e., this simulation was made to investigate the creation, expansion and dissolution of this type of universe.

And why would energy not be limited, dare I ask? We know the universe had a beginning, which then puts a limit on energy based on just... well, mass. Energy doesn't just pop out of nowhere, ever.
I think you misunderstood me, I do not in anyway try to deny E=mc^2 or Newton's Golden Law. What I meant was that I didn't understood how this may prove we live within a simulation. If energy and/or mass can magically appear out of nowhere, then it must mean we live in a simulation. That's at least how I resonate.

The first point makes the most sense, but even then, the perception of time doesn't hold up. This "simulation" may take nano-seconds on a higher state, and entropy would be the shut-down point, where-as we experience the same thing in billions-trillions of years. You just have to look at this from a different perspective.
As I said, this is a very intriguing thought experiment, and I don't want come of as a party-pooper. I do in fact wish that this is a simulation we live in. That it's something we can wake up from. Alas there is no hard proof, so I don't want to get too excited.
 

Thyunda

New member
May 4, 2009
2,955
0
0
Binnsyboy said:
TimeLord said:
So who's our Neo?
Me, quite obviously.

I break all the rules.

On a more serious note, isn't this Descartes' three levels of doubt all jazzed up with science?
On a more serious note, I'm fairly sure this is just Wolfram with "But literally machines"
 

Monshroud

Evil Overlord
Jul 29, 2009
1,024
0
0
Isn't this story the plot for the movie "The Thirteenth Floor" ? It is definitely a neat theory.