Ah well, each to their own i guess, but i wouldn't even put Hot Fuzz in my top 5 British films, let alone favourite films overall.nelsonr100 said:Deary me, post that on a forum like Empire and see what reaction you get, both Shaun and Hot Fuzz were fantastic. I find it hard to decide which I like more. They are both in my list of favorite films.Treefingers said:Slightly off topic, but i seriously despair whenever someone calls Hot Fuzz a British classic. There are so SO many MUCH better British films than Hot Fuzz.SalamanderJoe said:Scott Pilgrim hasn't opened in the UK yet, but I'd imagine it'll do well seeing as it's directed by Edgar Wright, who wrote and directed Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz. And those two are British classics.
(Shaun of the Dead is pretty good though)
What thread are you reading? Almost everyone here is hating on Scott pilgrim.Snake Plissken said:I am very confused by all of the hate for "The Expendables". When did people stop loving cheesy action films and start liking pretentious lame stuff that is based off even more boring and pretentious indie comics?
I would pay twice as much to see Stallone give his worst performance than to see Michael Cera give his best.
By the way, do you think that Edgar Wright (the director of the Scott Pilgrim film) hates "The Expendables?" FUCK NO. He wrote Hot Fuzz, which was basically an homage to anything LIKE "The Expendables." He's probably goddamned honored to have a film open up next to Stallone.
Another thing:
Do I NEED to see Scott Pilgrim in theaters to get the full experience? No...it'll do just fine on DVD.
The Expendables NEEDS, nay, DEMANDS to be seen in the theater. Chances are it will end up in a 5 dollar bin in 2 years, so it HAS to bank on the theatrical run.
I love Edgar Wright, I really do. I hope he continues to make films...but he'll be just fine in second place.
Its not in the plot ala Spaceballs or something, its in the art style, especially the faux-Tarentino cut shotswrecker77 said:Give me one example of the breaking the fourth wall thing your talking about. Use spoilers.Hugh Mann said:Better taste? don't be so quick to discount a good as action film as juvenile, they said the same thing about about rock n roll back in the day (as opposed to classical music), don't try to act cerebral, its a different taste not betterAgentNein said:You can have those last few. I'm giving them to you. You've earned them.Alpha1089 said:So you're a teenager/uni student that thinks they're one of the few people that thinks for themselves? Where is that old picture of all those people on the train thinking the exact same thing again? I really should save that for future reference.AgentNein said:I resent you implying that I'm not a pompous elitist know-it-all though, these are badges I wear with pride.
Also, you seem to have forgotten the vitally important parts from what you quoted. You know, the horse's ass, dipshit, douchebag part of the title that goes with being a pompous, elitist know-it-all?
For future reference I am neither a teenager, nor am I a uni student. Been there, graduated that. Just a well adjusted intelligent adult who doesn't enjoy macho American action movies designed to whip frat kids into a frenzy. Call it better taste, call it what you will.
OT: Scott Pilgrim felt like it stopped every five seconds to wink at you and say "Hey remember this video game, aren't we clever?!?" or "Hey we're breaking the fourth wall, isn't that imaginative?!?", Expendables looks a lot more straight forward, and less pretentious
yay someone else on this damn planet agrees with me!!!peteron85 said:Some things should just stay comic books, and Michael Cera is a terrible actor.
I really think this statement needs more attention!Kavonde said:Seriously. Go see the freaking movie. Don't just look down your nose and call it "hipster" (gee, snubbing something because you identify it with a subcultural stereotype you dislike sure makes them look like elitist douches), and don't just pass it by out of hatred for Michael Cera.
I've seen enough frigging movies lately trying to ram their metaphorical bullshit down my throat. I despise it in musicians when they make political songs and I sure as hell despise it when a fucking movie tries the exact same thing with me. I'm tired of every second movie forcing its view on me instead of leaving itself open to interpretation. What happened to films that people could sit back and decide what it meant to them?Kavonde said:You know, I haven't seen the Expendables, but I'm rapidly growing to hate it just on the basis that it's beating Scott Pilgrim so badly and that so many people (on this forum and elsewhere) are bashing Scott Pilgrim for being "pretentious" and for "hipsters" and blah dee blah up yours.
Scott Pilgrim is a film that everyone between the ages of 15 and 30 needs to see. Not just for the nerdy video game jokes and awesome kung fu, but so they can absorb the damn metaphor. We're a fairly fucked up generation for a variety of reasons, and the message this film has (that self respect is more important than "love," and that if you want something, you need to fight for it) is something that a hell of a lot of us need to learn.
And? From where I'm standing, I see this as a good thing. If it fails it means we might stop getting movies with 18-24 year old leads that are nervous around "the girl" that is far beyond their means, there'll be an end to "witty" and "clever" references to nerd culture and I won't have any more god damned bloody metaphors getting rammed down my throat.Plus, this is the first film aimed exclusively at our generation. If it fails, we ain't getting another for awhile.
I don't have a problem with Cera.And for those of you who just can't stand Michael Cera...I can't either. But you know what? He's not that bad here. And even when you do want to punch him, well, the movie wants you to, too. Scott Pilgrim isn't the most likable guy around. He's kind of a dick, kind of whiny, kind of shallow and self-absorbed.
not really but he's BA enough from snakes on a plane and star wars to be included in my book =pAkalabeth said:Jackson? He's not an action star.mrdude2010 said:the expendables really is just every action star ever except chuck norris and samuel L jackson put into one movie which is appealing in its own way... i was planning on waiting for the DVD for scott pilgrimRAKtheUndead said:I'm hardly surprised. The entire set-up of Scott Pilgrim never grabbed me as particularly public-friendly, let alone any good. Not many people actually want to see a film with a nerdy main protagonist, particularly one which is fighting for a fantasy girlfriend, whereas there's still a lot of nostalgia for the action stars of The Expendables.
Hell, I wasn't even around for the hey-day of the characters in the latter, yet I'd still be a lot more interested in it. It strikes me as a lot more fun than the offensively unrealistic portrayal of a loser getting the girl in the end.
tellmeimaninja said:The lack of Samuel Jackson automatically renders the main selling point of The Expendables invalid.Yokai said:Noooooooooo!
I stand by my belief that Scott Pilgrim was the second best film this year after Inception, but honestly I'm not surprised. A movie full of retro video game references based off a small-time graphic novel doesn't really stand a chance against a movie with every action star ever in it, regardless of how awesome the former is and how terrible the latter.
I don't care though, I mark it as another success in Edgar Wright's perfect record. It was so great.
I think we should all go see Scott Pilgrim. Right now.
Plus, as I've said: People are drugged monkeys who are easily entertained by random flashing coloured lights. That's the main reason The Expendables has made money at all.
Seriously?FaceFaceFace said:That's so offensive. To monkeys. Even drugged they have better decision-making skills than average film-goers.tellmeimaninja said:Plus, as I've said: People are drugged monkeys who are easily entertained by random flashing coloured lights. That's the main reason The Expendables has made money at all.
I concur!zen5887 said:I really think this statement needs more attention!Kavonde said:Seriously. Go see the freaking movie. Don't just look down your nose and call it "hipster" (gee, snubbing something because you identify it with a subcultural stereotype you dislike sure makes them look like elitist douches), and don't just pass it by out of hatred for Michael Cera.
My hat is indeed off to you sir =)