Share Your Shower Thoughts

Sep 24, 2008
2,461
0
0
Neurotic Void Melody said:
How much can a human truly understand grief if they believe in their heart that their loved ones still exist in a plain of pure happiness just waiting for them to kick the bucket so they can have a good old knees up for the rest of eternity?
I'll answer this.

My better than best friend (what we called each other) passed in May 2018. Due to an asshole doctor who slapped a band aid on a serious condition, her health waned as her body didn't get the care that she needed. Years after the quack did nothing, her body wilted from her disease. She had a number of surgeries, and they were always trying to get ahead of the thing, but it was so ingrained in her body at that point that it was just inevitable that it would all come crashing down.

And it did.

She was in constant, severe pain every day. If she was lucky, she was at a dull 4.5 out of 10 [https://wongbakerfaces.org/] for the entire day. She was on a wild variety of drugs that would work for a few months, and then the pain would overtake the treatment.

Her last days, she had to fight with her doctors because the dosage wasn't enough and people thought she was just getting high off of it. She just wanted to be able to sleep through a night.

She doesn't feel pain any more. She was an atheist. But she's free of pain. That would feel like heaven if you were constantly suffering.

And I still grieve to this day because I miss her. I grieve out of selfishness. No one is around to call me a brat. No one around to make me smile with just the light she would bring even on her most painful days.

And if there's a Heaven and we end up there somehow, I grieve that I lived my life without her. That's one thing I never wanted to do. Meeting up in Heaven and catching her up is a wonderful idea. But nothing could ever hold a candle to living all those experiences with her.
 
Sep 24, 2008
2,461
0
0
Post on top of another post, because I got it like that.

It's been officially 3 months since I put a razor to my face.

And my 'beard' is an unkempt (not for a lack of trying) hipster styled mess. Even though I'm well into my 30's... hell almost done with my 30's, I still have patches of my beardline that doesn't grow hair. And it looks like I styled it in this manner.

Totally pissed. Don't want to look like a hipster. Want to have a beard.
 

Chimpzy_v1legacy

Warning! Contains bananas!
Jun 21, 2009
4,789
1
0
"Did they name oranges that because they're that color, or was the color named after the fruit?"

Looked it up. It's the latter.
 

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
6,747
5,065
118
Plano, TX
Country
United States
Gender
Male
ObsidianJones said:
Post on top of another post, because I got it like that.

It's been officially 3 months since I put a razor to my face.

And my 'beard' is an unkempt (not for a lack of trying) hipster styled mess. Even though I'm well into my 30's... hell almost done with my 30's, I still have patches of my beardline that doesn't grow hair. And it looks like I styled it in this manner.

Totally pissed. Don't want to look like a hipster. Want to have a beard.
I feel your pain; I can?t grow a beard either. I?ve never really wanted one, but that stems mostly from the fact that it?s never been something I could have; I grow stubble just fine, but then it simply stops, and I get the ?you need to shave? comments instead of the ?oh, you?re growing a beard? ones. I think the longest I ever went without shaving was about two weeks, then it just stagnated, itched and looked terrible.
 
Sep 24, 2008
2,461
0
0
Xprimentyl said:
I feel your pain; I can't grow a beard either. I've never really wanted one, but that stems mostly from the fact that it's never been something I could have; I grow stubble just fine, but then it simply stops, and I get the "you need to shave" comments instead of the "oh, you're growing a beard" ones. I think the longest I ever went without shaving was about two weeks, then it just stagnated, itched and looked terrible.
... So, all I hear is that you want to have a Bad Beard-off. I accept. Name your rules and stakes.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,987
118
Xprimentyl said:
ObsidianJones said:
Post on top of another post, because I got it like that.

It's been officially 3 months since I put a razor to my face.

And my 'beard' is an unkempt (not for a lack of trying) hipster styled mess. Even though I'm well into my 30's... hell almost done with my 30's, I still have patches of my beardline that doesn't grow hair. And it looks like I styled it in this manner.

Totally pissed. Don't want to look like a hipster. Want to have a beard.
I feel your pain; I can?t grow a beard either. I?ve never really wanted one, but that stems mostly from the fact that it?s never been something I could have; I grow stubble just fine, but then it simply stops, and I get the ?you need to shave? comments instead of the ?oh, you?re growing a beard? ones. I think the longest I ever went without shaving was about two weeks, then it just stagnated, itched and looked terrible.
You aren't missing anything. Facial hair is annoying as shit to deal with. Don't be fooled by the incredibly stupid commercials I've seen popping up lately, that lean so heavily into the "if you don't have a lumberjack beard, you are a woosy beta cuck of a man" type of marketing to make you think it's somehow magical to have one, and then buy their product. You literally have to do nothing at all, and genetics allowing, have a massive beard. I have a friend in his late 30s now, and he's never had much luck with facial hair. It's never been an issue for the rest of us, because we have so much hair growing it's like trying to wrestle a yeti to keep it under control. I'd love to not have to worry about shaving as frequently as I have to, in order to stay clean looking for work.

Seriously, fuck facial hair.
 

McElroy

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 3, 2013
4,616
392
88
Finland
Society should get over the n-word. Shower thought triggered by the recent/ongoing Twitch drama about a young woman with Tourette's who ticks with the most unfortunate words and expressions (at least right now, it ebbs and flows). And everyone says it's fine, thus in conclusion...
 

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
6,747
5,065
118
Plano, TX
Country
United States
Gender
Male
ObsidianJones said:
Xprimentyl said:
I feel your pain; I can't grow a beard either. I've never really wanted one, but that stems mostly from the fact that it's never been something I could have; I grow stubble just fine, but then it simply stops, and I get the "you need to shave" comments instead of the "oh, you're growing a beard" ones. I think the longest I ever went without shaving was about two weeks, then it just stagnated, itched and looked terrible.
... So, all I hear is that you want to have a Bad Beard-off. I accept. Name your rules and stakes.
No more shaving until Half-Life 3 comes out. As such a time will be clear evidence of the Matrix, whoever?s beard looks worse gets to take the red pill, leave the simulation and jack back in wearing leather, sweet sunglasses and wicked kung fu skills.

Happyninja42 said:
Xprimentyl said:
ObsidianJones said:
Snap
You aren't missing anything. Facial hair is annoying as shit to deal with. Don't be fooled by the incredibly stupid commercials I've seen popping up lately, that lean so heavily into the "if you don't have a lumberjack beard, you are a woosy beta cuck of a man" type of marketing to make you think it's somehow magical to have one, and then buy their product. You literally have to do nothing at all, and genetics allowing, have a massive beard. I have a friend in his late 30s now, and he's never had much luck with facial hair. It's never been an issue for the rest of us, because we have so much hair growing it's like trying to wrestle a yeti to keep it under control. I'd love to not have to worry about shaving as frequently as I have to, in order to stay clean looking for work.

Seriously, fuck facial hair.
I?ve got some facial hair, a mustache, soul patch and a chin strip, but that?s about all that?ll grow; everywhere else on my face is like dead grass. But like I said, I?ve no real desire for a beard (not pressed by the latest ?groomed lumberjack? trend; I actually find it quite pretentious,) I?d just like to have the option.
 

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
6,747
5,065
118
Plano, TX
Country
United States
Gender
Male
TopazFusion said:
Is it just me or do Boris Johnson and Donald Trump have an uncanny resemblance.
It at least appears they might have the same avant-garde hairdresser.
 

Neurotic Void Melody

Bound to escape
Legacy
Jul 15, 2013
4,953
6
13
ObsidianJones said:
I'll answer this.

My better than best friend (what we called each other) passed in May 2018. Due to an asshole doctor who slapped a band aid on a serious condition, her health waned as her body didn't get the care that she needed. Years after the quack did nothing, her body wilted from her disease. She had a number of surgeries, and they were always trying to get ahead of the thing, but it was so ingrained in her body at that point that it was just inevitable that it would all come crashing down.

And it did.

She was in constant, severe pain every day. If she was lucky, she was at a dull 4.5 out of 10 [https://wongbakerfaces.org/] for the entire day. She was on a wild variety of drugs that would work for a few months, and then the pain would overtake the treatment.

Her last days, she had to fight with her doctors because the dosage wasn't enough and people thought she was just getting high off of it. She just wanted to be able to sleep through a night.

She doesn't feel pain any more. She was an atheist. But she's free of pain. That would feel like heaven if you were constantly suffering.

And I still grieve to this day because I miss her. I grieve out of selfishness. No one is around to call me a brat. No one around to make me smile with just the light she would bring even on her most painful days.

And if there's a Heaven and we end up there somehow, I grieve that I lived my life without her. That's one thing I never wanted to do. Meeting up in Heaven and catching her up is a wonderful idea. But nothing could ever hold a candle to living all those experiences with her.
Thankyou for your reply, it is beautiful and heartfelt and no doubt if your friend is able to read it as I or anyone else can, they will be moved countless times more by such sincerity. I admit I should've edited the wording of the question before leaving, so it doesn't read so annoyingly assholish to others, but was in a rush and didn't think anyone would look twice at it. The more correct intent behind it was "what extent of differences are there between the grief of believers of an afterlife compared to those without said belief?" Mainly inspired from a part of a book from a lady talking about letting go of God and how she went through a second grieving process for her passed on loved ones. The grief of someone close who is clearly alive and experiencing suffering is completely understandable and I assume holds far less differences between the faithful and faithless in that regard. The curiosity is born from the abstract, the metaphysical perceptions of absence in mortality and what loss means to each individual. (Sorry for ridiculously late reply, been a little under the weather of late)
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,987
118
Why are people freaking out about how creepy the CATS actors look? I mean, they've ALWAYS looked creepy and furry, as far back as the stage performances. It's not any different. It's just CGI creepy now instead of cosplay creepy.
 

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
6,747
5,065
118
Plano, TX
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Watched The Matrix Reloaded for the 170th time last night, and this morning in the shower I finally wondered: how in the hell does Zion exist? The machines have the vast majority of humans doing their best Duracell impression, and they?ve the resources to send a sentinel for every man, woman and child in Zion; how did the comparatively few free humans manage to build a high-tech, underground shanty town without being discovered? The necessary engineering, excavation, logistics, heavy machinery, etc., a project of that undertaking would take YEARS of intense planning, development, a massive fuck-ton of resources and ultimately construction, and that?s IF it?d even be possible; there?s no way a ragtag bunch of humans could have surreptitiously pulled that off under the noses of the multitude of hyper-intelligent, sentient machines hell bent on finding them. (Yes, of all the things the Matrix films require one suspend disbelief for, this is the issue I?ve drawn the line at.)
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,987
118
Xprimentyl said:
Watched The Matrix Reloaded for the 170th time last night, and this morning in the shower I finally wondered: how in the hell does Zion exist? The machines have the vast majority of humans doing their best Duracell impression, and they?ve the resources to send a sentinel for every man, woman and child in Zion; how did the comparatively few free humans manage to build a high-tech, underground shanty town without being discovered? The necessary engineering, excavation, logistics, heavy machinery, etc., a project of that undertaking would take YEARS of intense planning, development, a massive fuck-ton of resources and ultimately construction, and that?s IF it?d even be possible; there?s no way a ragtag bunch of humans could have surreptitiously pulled that off under the noses of the multitude of hyper-intelligent, sentient machines hell bent on finding them. (Yes, of all the things the Matrix films require one suspend disbelief for, this is the issue I?ve drawn the line at.)
The Architect basically explains that the formation of Zion is a known thing that he allows to happen, as a layer of control for the percentage of humans that reject the matrix. I always just assumed it was something that the machines would be ordered to just ignore for a sufficient amount of time. Basically just having them have an "out of bounds" type protocol, and just ignore The One for the iteration of the Matrix, and his handful of others selected to repopulate Zion.

And that The One, and the handful are basically aware of what they are doing, but after several generations, it's just lost to time. Or The One for that iteration just doesn't tell them that he's made a deal with the Architect, and just convinces them they were able to escape. If The One for that iteration is as powerful as Neo is shown to be, I don't think it's that far fetched to think he could mask their presence to the machines, long enough to set up a new Zion.
 

EvilRoy

The face I make when I see unguarded pie.
Legacy
Jan 9, 2011
1,848
548
118
Xprimentyl said:
Watched The Matrix Reloaded for the 170th time last night, and this morning in the shower I finally wondered: how in the hell does Zion exist? The machines have the vast majority of humans doing their best Duracell impression, and they?ve the resources to send a sentinel for every man, woman and child in Zion; how did the comparatively few free humans manage to build a high-tech, underground shanty town without being discovered? The necessary engineering, excavation, logistics, heavy machinery, etc., a project of that undertaking would take YEARS of intense planning, development, a massive fuck-ton of resources and ultimately construction, and that?s IF it?d even be possible; there?s no way a ragtag bunch of humans could have surreptitiously pulled that off under the noses of the multitude of hyper-intelligent, sentient machines hell bent on finding them. (Yes, of all the things the Matrix films require one suspend disbelief for, this is the issue I?ve drawn the line at.)
It's actually semi-explained in the architects long ass ramble. Zion, to one extent or another, has always been there. It was put in place as a staging ground for non compliant humans in version 2 (I think) after v1 blew up and they realized that nonbelieving was just innate to whatever % of humans and they would eventually cause a collapse if not filtered. So the start point for Zion was just present and built upon in each new version of the matrix. The resources and space were put there and then pointedly ignored by the machines to facilitate it. From what I could gather The One was supposed to pick out a group of survivors, who would then "rebuild" and start the resistance back up. The old The One would eventually die and his legend would be carried on as a bullshit prophecy to signal the next round.

It's also kind of implied that the previous Ones decided to be in on the deal with the machines on the basis that at least humanity would survive, and presumably the next round could shake out in humanities favour.

The real issue with all that is basically what you said except in universe. Of all these humans uniquely predisposed to not buying into bullshit even if bullshit is all they know, why did nobody look around and say "wait where the fuck did all this cool shit come from, and why haven't the eternal robot overlords who hate us not noticed it?" There's this really weird undertone of humans being confident and non-paranoid with respect to existing outside the matrix that makes no sense.

Edit:

Ninjaed by a Ninja
 

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
6,747
5,065
118
Plano, TX
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Happyninja42 said:
Xprimentyl said:
The Architect basically explains that the formation of Zion is a known thing that he allows to happen, as a layer of control for the percentage of humans that reject the matrix. I always just assumed it was something that the machines would be ordered to just ignore for a sufficient amount of time. Basically just having them have an "out of bounds" type protocol, and just ignore The One for the iteration of the Matrix, and his handful of others selected to repopulate Zion.

And that The One, and the handful are basically aware of what they are doing, but after several generations, it's just lost to time. Or The One for that iteration just doesn't tell them that he's made a deal with the Architect, and just convinces them they were able to escape. If The One for that iteration is as powerful as Neo is shown to be, I don't think it's that far fetched to think he could mask their presence to the machines, long enough to set up a new Zion.
Hmm? I?m willing to believe as you believe, that Zion is allowed to exist, but that still leaves the how? It?s underground, closer to the Earth?s core where it?s warm; ever dug a hole? What?d you do with all the stuff filling the space where the hole now is? Ever dug a hole several thousand meters deep and then dug out a cavity big enough to accommodate thousands of people and then filled it with structurally sound buildings and advanced technologies making your several thousand meters underground cavity effectively a city? Every done all that discreetly? Even if the machines allowed Zion to exist, the few free humans simply could not have done it.

I?ll add to your theory: perhaps the machines built Zion?

Edit: Lol, Ninja?d by EvilRoy
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,987
118
Xprimentyl said:
Happyninja42 said:
Xprimentyl said:
The Architect basically explains that the formation of Zion is a known thing that he allows to happen, as a layer of control for the percentage of humans that reject the matrix. I always just assumed it was something that the machines would be ordered to just ignore for a sufficient amount of time. Basically just having them have an "out of bounds" type protocol, and just ignore The One for the iteration of the Matrix, and his handful of others selected to repopulate Zion.

And that The One, and the handful are basically aware of what they are doing, but after several generations, it's just lost to time. Or The One for that iteration just doesn't tell them that he's made a deal with the Architect, and just convinces them they were able to escape. If The One for that iteration is as powerful as Neo is shown to be, I don't think it's that far fetched to think he could mask their presence to the machines, long enough to set up a new Zion.
Hmm? I?m willing to believe as you believe, that Zion is allowed to exist, but that still leaves the how? It?s underground, closer to the Earth?s core where it?s warm; ever dug a hole? What?d you do with all the stuff filling the space where the hole now is? Ever dug a hole several thousand meters deep and then dug out a cavity big enough to accommodate thousands of people and then filled it with structurally sound buildings and advanced technologies making your several thousand meters underground cavity effectively a city? Every done all that discreetly? Even if the machines allowed Zion to exist, the few free humans simply could not have done it.

I?ll add to your theory: perhaps the machines built Zion?
Oh I agree, the entire premise is incredibly far fetched, no argument there. But to the initial question of "how did they do all that and not be noticed by the machines" I just figured it was sort of a "deal with the devil" kind of thing, between The One and the Architect. Since the Architect flat out said allowing those who reject it to leave was the best way to control that variance in humanity, to him, it's not really rebels, it's just a Variance Habitat. A pressure valve if you will. So yeah, he could totally have it set up where the machines build some "ruins of the old world" or whatever, when it's time for Zion 5.0 (after destroying Zion 4.0), but nobody knows that. Then just tell The One "hey here are the coordinates for a suitable habitation location we have prepared for you. There are suitable 'ruined' materials you can utilize to create rudimentary machines for survival, and sustenance." And then The One "discovers" the ruins with his band of people to repopulate the city.

Given the level of control The Architect likes to have over literally every possible contingency and situation, this seems perfectly logical and machine like in thinking. It's no effort at all for them to terraform some caverns to make the ruins for The One, and then just leaving it alone as it's literally part of their system. They are the control mechanism, so allowing them to use it is helping the functionality of The Matrix.

Now, I fully admit that none of this is directly stated in the film (as best as I can recall), but..actually let me rewatch that one scene.... ok so, yeah I just rewatched the Architect scene, and he flat out tells Neo that once Zion is destroyed, he is to select 23 other people to repopulate Zion. He says that outright. So it's all part of the layers of control. He KNOWS Zion exists, he accounts for it in His Plan. That's the whole point. It's there to give the anomalies of humanity a place to go, essentially, a human society septic tank, as far as the machines are concerned. To them, the purging of Zion (which they've done 5 times prior to Neo showing up) could be compared to dumping out the waste tank because it got full. The humans there reached a level where their interference with the Matrix was more of a hindrance, than their purpose as a human waste repository. So, dump it out, purge it, and then let The One and his 23 Breeders, start over. Sure it's a repeating process but, I mean, that's a process, a system, that's what the machines are all about. To them it's not a problem, it's just the system functioning normally. Zion = Septic Tank, and it serves it's purpose until reaching capacity, at which time, procedure is dump it and then go back to work until it's full again.

So yeah, to me that suggests, since Architect directly orders Neo to do this, that they probably always know where Zion is, they just ignore it, and let the humans live in a state of false security, that they are "hidden". And the war in Revolutions is just the unpleasant, messy work of dumping out the trash.
 

Chimpzy_v1legacy

Warning! Contains bananas!
Jun 21, 2009
4,789
1
0
Happyninja42 said:
Why are people freaking out about how creepy the CATS actors look? I mean, they've ALWAYS looked creepy and furry, as far back as the stage performances. It's not any different. It's just CGI creepy now instead of cosplay creepy.
I'm guessing costumes and make-up just rank lower on the uncanny valley scale than CGI.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,987
118
I hate the "Always" bumper stickers I see on cars. Snape was NOT a good person. At all. His unrequited love for Mama Potter doesn't excuse him being an absolute shit to Harry, and torturing him for years with physical and psychological abuse.

Sure it seems oh so romantic from the outside, and because Alan Rickman is a boss actor who can make someone as irredeemable as Snape seem nice, but it's really not.

I mean, think about their actual dynamic. Snape is that guy in highschool, that had the hots for a girl, and kind of stalked her for years. Not the guy she married and had kids with, the Other Guy.

Would anyone really want the Other Guy, to proceed to harrass and abuse their child after they are dead? Because he didn't get to fuck her in highschool? Always, shove that Always up your ass Snape, you are not a good "dark hero." You were a petty, spiteful man, who never got over the girl who turned him down in school. Woopty doo.
 

BrawlMan

Lover of beat'em ups.
Legacy
Mar 10, 2016
30,286
12,563
118
Detroit, Michigan
Country
United States of America
Gender
Male
Happyninja42 said:
I hate the "Always" bumper stickers I see on cars. Snape was NOT a good person. At all. His unrequited love for Mama Potter doesn't excuse him being an absolute shit to Harry, and torturing him for years with physical and psychological abuse.

Sure it seems oh so romantic from the outside, and because Alan Rickman is a boss actor who can make someone as irredeemable as Snape seem nice, but it's really not.

I mean, think about their actual dynamic. Snape is that guy in highschool, that had the hots for a girl, and kind of stalked her for years. Not the guy she married and had kids with, the Other Guy.

Would anyone really want the Other Guy, to proceed to harrass and abuse their child after they are dead? Because he didn't get to fuck her in highschool? Always, shove that Always up your ass Snape, you are not a good "dark hero." You were a petty, spiteful man, who never got over the girl who turned him down in school. Woopty doo.
We call that unintentionally unsympathetic. It happens more often than you think. I made a similar rant about as
Ayane (dead or alive) in my disliking game for petty reasons thread. With a character like that though, I wouldn't exactly call it petty. How you feel correctly about Snape, is how I feel about characters like Suyin Beifong, Holdo, Hao Asakura, Kagome/Kiyo on my characters you're supposed to like or find sympathetic, but their absolute shit.