Go to this website, this is where I buy all my games, for about a year now.Reaper195 said:One can only hope these are just people trolling, and not actually serious (Which would simply proove they've played one of the other. Or neither.). And in the end, it doesn't matter. I see retarded comments on youtube videos, get momentarily annoyed, then go about living real life.Doclector said:Yes, yes they have. I feel like I should make a farnsworth reference, maybe post that axe picture from american psycho, say something about letting loose the nukes and bringing it all to an end, but no, I have no words to describe how such people make me feel.Reaper195 said:...people have been saying this? But...but no Treyarch game was even remotely similar to Halo aside from the general FPS gameplay. If anything, they made their CoD games more like CoD 4...Doclector said:"Treyarch ruined cod by making it halo!"
Lol...wut? I think it's going to come out NZ (Assuming you mean New Zealand) at about a hundred and thirty. At least. That's how much the standard game was for console (110 for PC if I remember rightly) and MW3 came out 150 for everything. Either way....wooo! Another Kiwi!Valagetti said:I'll pay $70 NZ,
Did you read the OP?TheKasp said:Dude... "Support"? I won't support it from my side but awakaning an actual boycot from a community does not work. It's CoD we're talking about. Not even NOTCH could get his fanidiots who figuratively worship him as a godfigure to stop buying this games. Call of Duty: Ponyriding Simulator would be a bestseller!
Pick your battles, man...
oh god.... Is it just me or does this make the game look even worse?Norrdicus said:We should support Black Ops 2... because Kim Kardashian does!
![]()
...GethBall said:oh god.... Is it just me or does this make the game look even worse?Norrdicus said:We should support Black Ops 2... because Kim Kardashian does!
![]()
Celebrity? HA!Korten12 said:...GethBall said:oh god.... Is it just me or does this make the game look even worse?Norrdicus said:We should support Black Ops 2... because Kim Kardashian does!
![]()
Really?
REALLY?
Some celebirty says a game looks good (though I will be the first to admit the graphics don't look impressive at all) and it makes it look bad?
Really?
Celebrity =/= good or smart. She is dumb as a rock and makes a shit load stupid decisions like its her primary function (though I will also admit the only thing I know about her is that whole marriage scandal thing) but with how America is, she counts as a celebrity.GethBall said:Celebrity? HA!Korten12 said:...GethBall said:oh god.... Is it just me or does this make the game look even worse?Norrdicus said:We should support Black Ops 2... because Kim Kardashian does!
![]()
Really?
REALLY?
Some celebirty says a game looks good (though I will be the first to admit the graphics don't look impressive at all) and it makes it look bad?
Really?
Many laughs were had.
I'll believe it when I see it. Most RPGs can't do choice and consequence properly, let alone a studio that's been making scripted shooters for yonks (and not even very good ones at that).Korten12 said:Because they're actually changing how the foundation of the Single-player works by adding choice and consequence where there is none. Picking between various missions to go on and based on fail or win change things. Also multiple endings.Woodsey said:It's been through several time periods already. It's gotten more and more restrictive as time has gone on. Why is this indicative of innovation?
Barely any FPSs have this, hell I don't think any recent one's do.
I actually just started to follow these games when Modern Warfare 1 came out. Before that, the COD 1, 2 and 3 always seemed like Medal of Honor clones to me and after that Medal of Honor became a clone of COD....oh the irony...it never stops...shrekfan246 said:It's Activision, not EA. An understandable mistake, since EA does the same thing with every single one of their sports franchises as well as Battlefield.Chairman Miaow said:Buy Blops2:
EA guys: "They love it when we release the same game every year, let's do it with all our franchises!"
Don't buy Blops2:
EA guys: "They hate it when we change things, let's keep making the same game every year!"
Yeah, either way, lose-lose. CoD will do fine though.
Also...
You haven't actually been following CoD very much, have you? Here:The Floating Nose said:Snip
2005 - Call of Duty 2
2006 - Call of Duty 3
2007 - Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
2008 - Call of Duty: World at War
2009 - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
2010 - Call of Duty: Black Ops
2011 - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
Probably 2012 - Call of Duty: Black Ops 2
Treyarch has no affiliation with the Modern Warfare name other than it being in the Call of Duty franchise (and I think a part in the Wii port of 3, but who cares about that).
OT: Eh. I've not bought a Call of Duty title ever, and I can't really see that this will be the first one, unless they really decide to shake up the formula.