Hmmm, Sue storm would have to be black as well then..I know people like to pretend that Race isn't a thing, but its kind of a thing.
James bond is always treated as the same person, the actor changing is just ignored, there are even occasional cross actor references in a couple of movies I think. It's also not a classic reboot when they change him, far to much remains the same.MeChaNiZ3D said:Same thing with James Bond, unless there is some kind of canon nod to the theory that each acted James Bond is a different agent, and presuming that is not the case, I would be against a black James Bond, or any other colour.
It would be interesting to see but tricky to keep him noticeably the same character. While plenty changes about him, in all his TV incarnations with one exception he's pretty much been played as an eccentric upper middle-class Brit(and usually sporting a southern English accent) the one time he deviated from this noticeably, at the start of 'Modern' Who where it was commented upon. Since Eccleston's departure from the posh Brit role, the next two have somewhat pulled the role back to said eccentric posh Brit characteristics.MeChaNiZ3D said:Doctor Who on the other hand, has no reason to be white all the time since his regenerations seem to reconfigure everything else about him, and probably should have been another colour at least once by now.
I know what you meant to say, but you may want to change the wording on that!Milanezi said:WHY are you looking at Bond?! What did I miss? What happened to Bond??? He MUST remain British!!!
To be fair, the whole casting in that movie was horrible. Marky Mark as Max Payne didn't cut it for me. Max is supposed to be grizzled and cynical and depressed; Marky just looks angry most of the time. Same with Ludacris - who thought changing an irascible, bumbling old fart into such a bored, lackluster character?Goofguy said:As long as they stay true to the nature of the character, then I'm okay with this.
I did get pretty irked when they had Ludacris play Jim Bravura in the Max Payne movie. Here's a crusty, overweight, middle aged white character being played by a young, fit black man... why? I'm all for having the best actor for the role regardless of race but that casting choice was just *puts sunglasses on* ludicrous.
Sorry for quoting you. First off, I have no real idea about the back story or origin stories or anything whatsoever. I just want to make that clear. I thought the first film was fun but totally and utterly forgettable. If I concentrate, I think there might have been a sequel which made the first film look good in retrospect by simply being terribad. But this part of what you said intrigued me.kypsilon said:The real problem there is that it's not an in-house Marvel movie like the Avengers, it's done by 20th Century Fox which means it will likely suck and also likely get another remake if and when the rights ever default back to Marvel/Disney.Lunar Templar said:I'm more bothered by the fact they're making ANOTHER' Fantastic Four movie then the color of the flaming twat I didn't like the first time around.
OT: I'm not a fan of the race swapping thing in a pre-established character. The Fantastic Four is that stereotypical white 50's family with superpowers. I have comics where Johnny Storm is the most painfully white California bleach blond kid you can roll out of the suburbs. He's so white he makes Wonder Bread look tanned. But sadly, as humorous as that is, he is still a white guy. I'd cry bloody murder if they made Storm or Luke Cage white. That's not racist, that's having respect for the character as they were made.
If Marvel comics wants to make an all black or multi-racial family out of the Fantastic Four though, I'd be all for that. At the same time though, they could just make new and interesting characters that aren't white. A little color in the comics wouldn't hurt.
That line right there justifies raceswapping etc. Bringing the film away from its roots and into the 21st century. Cause yeah, 1961 (Some other dude in the thread used that date, not me, not claiming I know when it was written) was not exactly the most enlightened time. If the film is going to be set in the 21st century and dealing with evil superblehs using modern evil superbleh powers (Superbleh, my term for describing people with superpowers who do not interest me at all) then it is fair to bring the origin stories forward was well.I'm not a fan of the race swapping thing in a pre-established character. The Fantastic Four is that stereotypical white 50's family with superpowers.
Is his whiteness the defining part of his character or is it his suburban upbringing?I have comics where Johnny Storm is the most painfully white California bleach blond kid you can roll out of the suburbs.
My answer to stuff like this is, if you don't like it, don't change it, make something new. The past was a racist place, yes. But I'd argue that if you're offended by how white bread media from it is, there are better ways to fix it than inserting modern ideals into an old property. To do so would be to gloss over something from a dark period of history. In other words, don't remake Leave it to Beaver but make the family multicultural. Make a show like Modern Family instead.Mr F. said:Sorry for quoting you. First off, I have no real idea about the back story or origin stories or anything whatsoever. I just want to make that clear. I thought the first film was fun but totally and utterly forgettable. If I concentrate, I think there might have been a sequel which made the first film look good in retrospect by simply being terribad. But this part of what you said intrigued me.kypsilon said:The real problem there is that it's not an in-house Marvel movie like the Avengers, it's done by 20th Century Fox which means it will likely suck and also likely get another remake if and when the rights ever default back to Marvel/Disney.Lunar Templar said:I'm more bothered by the fact they're making ANOTHER' Fantastic Four movie then the color of the flaming twat I didn't like the first time around.
OT: I'm not a fan of the race swapping thing in a pre-established character. The Fantastic Four is that stereotypical white 50's family with superpowers. I have comics where Johnny Storm is the most painfully white California bleach blond kid you can roll out of the suburbs. He's so white he makes Wonder Bread look tanned. But sadly, as humorous as that is, he is still a white guy. I'd cry bloody murder if they made Storm or Luke Cage white. That's not racist, that's having respect for the character as they were made.
If Marvel comics wants to make an all black or multi-racial family out of the Fantastic Four though, I'd be all for that. At the same time though, they could just make new and interesting characters that aren't white. A little color in the comics wouldn't hurt.
That line right there justifies raceswapping etc. Bringing the film away from its roots and into the 21st century. Cause yeah, 1961 (Some other dude in the thread used that date, not me, not claiming I know when it was written) was not exactly the most enlightened time. If the film is going to be set in the 21st century and dealing with evil superblehs using modern evil superbleh powers (Superbleh, my term for describing people with superpowers who do not interest me at all) then it is fair to bring the origin stories forward was well.I'm not a fan of the race swapping thing in a pre-established character. The Fantastic Four is that stereotypical white 50's family with superpowers.
Is his whiteness the defining part of his character or is it his suburban upbringing?I have comics where Johnny Storm is the most painfully white California bleach blond kid you can roll out of the suburbs.
See, from what I have seen there are not that many good examples of why changing the race is that much of a huge thing. Or that much of a thing at all. If you are right and have caught the spirit of the original comics, that they were supposed to be a typical family from the Suburbs given SUPEH POWEHS! then a shift to diversify keeps them in line with being a typical family. Or maybe just no longer the *most* typical family.
"Rhyme nor reason". Quite Captcha. Quite.
Absolutely all valid points. But I think rather than letting the studios change the source material, the comics should do it first. Upgrade the Fantastic Four for a new age and then make a movie about them.Mr F. said:Sorry for quoting you. First off, I have no real idea about the back story or origin stories or anything whatsoever. I just want to make that clear. I thought the first film was fun but totally and utterly forgettable. If I concentrate, I think there might have been a sequel which made the first film look good in retrospect by simply being terribad. But this part of what you said intrigued me.kypsilon said:The real problem there is that it's not an in-house Marvel movie like the Avengers, it's done by 20th Century Fox which means it will likely suck and also likely get another remake if and when the rights ever default back to Marvel/Disney.Lunar Templar said:I'm more bothered by the fact they're making ANOTHER' Fantastic Four movie then the color of the flaming twat I didn't like the first time around.
OT: I'm not a fan of the race swapping thing in a pre-established character. The Fantastic Four is that stereotypical white 50's family with superpowers. I have comics where Johnny Storm is the most painfully white California bleach blond kid you can roll out of the suburbs. He's so white he makes Wonder Bread look tanned. But sadly, as humorous as that is, he is still a white guy. I'd cry bloody murder if they made Storm or Luke Cage white. That's not racist, that's having respect for the character as they were made.
If Marvel comics wants to make an all black or multi-racial family out of the Fantastic Four though, I'd be all for that. At the same time though, they could just make new and interesting characters that aren't white. A little color in the comics wouldn't hurt.
That line right there justifies raceswapping etc. Bringing the film away from its roots and into the 21st century. Cause yeah, 1961 (Some other dude in the thread used that date, not me, not claiming I know when it was written) was not exactly the most enlightened time. If the film is going to be set in the 21st century and dealing with evil superblehs using modern evil superbleh powers (Superbleh, my term for describing people with superpowers who do not interest me at all) then it is fair to bring the origin stories forward was well.I'm not a fan of the race swapping thing in a pre-established character. The Fantastic Four is that stereotypical white 50's family with superpowers.
Is his whiteness the defining part of his character or is it his suburban upbringing?I have comics where Johnny Storm is the most painfully white California bleach blond kid you can roll out of the suburbs.
See, from what I have seen there are not that many good examples of why changing the race is that much of a huge thing. Or that much of a thing at all. If you are right and have caught the spirit of the original comics, that they were supposed to be a typical family from the Suburbs given SUPEH POWEHS! then a shift to diversify keeps them in line with being a typical family. Or maybe just no longer the *most* typical family.
"Rhyme nor reason". Quite Captcha. Quite.
You forgot Blade. Blade is white in the Comics but was black in the movies.x EvilErmine x said:Who the fuck cares? Seriously I think people should stop complaining about stuff like this. why would you care whom the actor is, what's important is how he or she plays the role. Can they bring the character to life? Thats the only thing that matters.
For example
![]()
![]()
And
![]()
![]()
Do you really think that they would have been any more awesome if they were played by a white actor as per the source material?
Yeah I got that impression as well, most of the time game "journalists" were strawmanning those who disliked the reboot by saying "you just don't like Dante's hair color." When the complaints, which admittedly had some of that, also included:Kaulen Fuhs said:I was under the impression that most of the complaints came from the change to Dante's character, which is something I can actually understand. Sure, there was some complaining about his new look, but I don't think it was as much an issue to people who actually played it and were upset about Dante being a completely different person.Little Gray said:Its for the same reason that people freaked out when they changed how Dante looked in DMC. When you take an existing character and completely redesign the look it will never go over with the fans. Especially when they is no point in doing tn such as the case with Johnny Storm.Kaulen Fuhs said:What relevance it has. Is his "whiteness" central to his character? If so, in what way? If not, then who cares?
And no, "he's white" does not speak for itself in terms of relevance, unless he's a Neo-Nazi or something..
People played it and also complained about the story and Dante's character. Not his look.Little Gray said:Well sorry to break it to you but your kind of wrong. Sure the people who played it didnt care but the people who played it were not the same people who were bitching for six months straight about Dantes new look.Kaulen Fuhs said:I was under the impression that most of the complaints came from the change to Dante's character, which is something I can actually understand. Sure, there was some complaining about his new look, but I don't think it was as much an issue to people who actually played it and were upset about Dante being a completely different person.
Actually you are right he wasn't.Spot1990 said:...No he really isn't. Never has been.KrossBillNye said:You forgot Blade. Blade is white in the Comics...
Also half brother and sister maybe? Not everything is the nuclear family nowadays. Their mother remarried and got pregnant with Johnny, simple.
No, he's not impossible to get behind. I'm just trying to put things into perspective, show that it's not all racism and bigotry. I also think it's a needless change that serves no purpose. The flip side is "Would it matter if he was played by a white actor?" Honestly, I got sick of this with the Spider-Man thing. If they change the FF to the point I don't enjoy it, I'll read the comics instead, providing they don't force a black Johnny Storm into the comics, like they did with Sammy L J. I may be sick of that crap, but I still feel the need to defend the middle ground, the grey area. That it's not all racism. Plenty of people just don't want change. I feel some of the actual racists (those who are racist with things like this "******'s can't be nerds" etc but not in any other way) are actually confused and aren't sure WHY they don't want it. they just know a change is bad.trty00 said:That I would understand because pink frills would look fucking stupid. This isn't pink frills however, it's a change in skin and hair color. Everything else remains intact, it's just his race, which is insignificant. I mean, is Human Torch just impossible to get behind now because he's black?ninjaRiv said:I don't have issues with race, trust me. I was defending SOME fans hatred towards change, not race. I didn't say all fans were like that at all. A lot of racism, I think, comes from not wanting ANY change at all. It's easy to sound racist of race is what's being changed. What if they wanted him wearing pink frills as a costume? Pretty sure they'd have the same complaints. 'Kay?trty00 said:But facets of personality don't change because of race! If you think they do, then I'm sorry, but that IS racist. Human Torch can still be a wisecracking doofus even if he's black! If you're also unable to connect to someone just because of skin color, then I apologize again, but I think you got some issues...ninjaRiv said:People like yourself forget that these characters are important to a lot of people. I'm gonna go all the way back to the black Spider-man thing here, which I didn't want to do because I got fucking sick of that.trty00 said:When it's something as arbitrary as a characters race, and has absolutely ZERO effect on who the man is as a character... then what's the fucking problem?
No, really, what's the fucking problem? If you're getting pissy over something as minor and insignificant as a racial change, you've got some issues. Source material be damned.
Not too mention, and this is the bit people are probably going to take offense to, with so many roles in these films going to good looking white guys, I don't really see too much of an issue with one or two bits going to someone of a different race. That's right, things aren't the perfect utopia of equality idiots tell you it is, and as far as I'm concerned, it's okay to get rid of some of all the goddamn whiteness.
These characters have been around for a long time. A lot of people grew up with them or found them at certain points in life. peter Parker was like looking into a mirror for many social outcasts and still is. Black AND white, by the way. So the continued to read about these characters and fall in love with them. It's what built our community, for crying out loud.
So you can go ahead and call those people sad and pathetic but they're not. They're seeing characters they love, characters who represent who they are (Spider-man) and who they desperately want to be (Human Torch) and I think wanting nothing about them to change is perfectly valid. That's the fucking problem. They see characters having ethnicity changed because of no reason at all and they don't like it. I'd probably count myself among these people a little, although, these two characters never had a big impact on me. But there are characters who have. And I'd fight anybody who tried to change them. It's needless change for stupid reasons. Also, people like myself are sensitive to being called racist because we have a preference. That adds a lot to the fighting.
And don't talk to me like I'm some pleb who knows fuck all about comics, kay? I've got favorite heroes,just like you. If a Green Arrow film was being made, and it turns Ollie Queen was Spanish this time around, I wouldn't give a damn.
Well an actor said he was interested, and he'd like a fair shot. Nothing really more about it.KrossBillNye said:Personally I would just like to know why they want to do this? Is it because of the lack of black guy rolls in movies? Why not release a few movies with lead black guy superheros? I would love to see a Luke Cage, Bishop, or Black Panther Movie.
Oh absolutely. I am not saying he isn't 'allowed'. I am just saying it doesn't make sense due to source material.Lovely Mixture said:Well an actor said he was interested, and he'd like a fair shot. Nothing really more about it.KrossBillNye said:Personally I would just like to know why they want to do this? Is it because of the lack of black guy rolls in movies? Why not release a few movies with lead black guy superheros? I would love to see a Luke Cage, Bishop, or Black Panther Movie.
No one can really say "you can't do that." I mean, studios are allowed to pick their actors any way they want to right?
Definitely, I hope I didn't come off as trying to put words in your mouth.KrossBillNye said:Oh absolutely. I am not saying he isn't 'allowed'.
It might not make sense. But I think it would gather some interest if the movie looked good enough.KrossBillNye said:I am just saying it doesn't make sense due to source material.
Its like if Hollywood wanted to make a Static Shock movie with a white man.
Does that really interest everyone?
Is he? I want this to be true so that everyone can stop niggling about it but I can't find a source.JimB said:In the comics, Johnny Storm is adopted. There's no reason he can't be adopted here, or a half-brother, or some other form of family.
I love when people start quoting from the Speech and Debate 101 handbook so they can sound like they know what they're talking about. Fictional or not, the guy who came up with Johnny Storm made him a white guy. By your logic, it'd make just as much sense to have Sonic the Hedgehog CGI'd in as Johnny Storm because hey! Who cares? It's just a fictional character, right? Since they didn't exist we can do whatever we want with them! Santa isn't a big fat guy in a red suit with a beard, he's a kangaroo with a top-hat that lives in the ocean and knits socks.boots said:Uhhh ... at the risk of sounding patronizing ... you are aware that Johnny Storm isn't a real person, right? Never has been? He's a fictional character in a comic book series who has the power to set himself on fire and fly around. Muhammad Ali was a real person. Comparing the two is kind of ridiculous.RJ 17 said:So going back to my example, would you consider it racist for a film about Muhammad Ali to NOT cast a white actor as Ali if said actor gave the best audtion? Edit: That is, would you consider the ensuing "WTF?!"ing from critics and audience members at the fact that they got a white guy to play Ali to be racist?MrGalactus said:There is definitely something racist about refusing to consider an actor or actress based purely on the colour of their skin, regardless of how well they actually play the character.
I'd argue no, it isn't. Why? Because Muhammad Ali was black..that's a fact. Just as Johnny Storm is white, that is also a fact.
You can't say "Johnny Storm IS white" in the same way that you say "Muhammad Ali was black." Because, y'know, Johnny Storm isn't actually white. He isn't actually anything. He doesn't really exist.
Oh, and you're also making the same old false equivalence argument between black and white characters but I'm bored of pointing out to people that it's a false equivalence when I'm 99% sure that they already know that it is, and are just hoping no one will call them out on it.
Have a pleasant day.RJ 17 said:You know, just once I'd like to come to The Escapist and NOT see a topic (or three) in the "Popular Forum Posts" box that's about race/sex/sexual preferences. Just once.erttheking said:You know, just once JUST ONCE I want to see a discussion on race/sex/sexual preferences that has people respecting one another, being polite, and not just devolving into throwing insults at one another. JUST! ONCE!![]()
But this WOULD be a version of the Marvel universe in which Johnny Storm was a black guy. :/ Why would it make it any better if they'd switched his race in a series of comics or in a film?RJ 17 said:If there was ever a version of the Marvel universe in which Johnny Storm was a black guy, there'd be absolutely no problem with this because it'd be officially canon that "In this series of comics, Johnny was actually black." Since that isn't the case, it's non-canon. And THAT - getting back to the main point of this mess - is why people are "nerd-raging" about this. It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that Jordan is black, it's all about the fact that it goes completely against canon.