So apparently the new Fant4stic is the Green Lantern of 2015

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
Mildly disappointed, but not much surprised. But I've said before, I'm not at all sure The Fantastic Four is something that can or should be brought into the present day. Serious and quiet (and apparently, dull) is one way to try to fail, but if anything, I suspect a literal translation of its Silver Age-era cheesiness would fail even harder. If don't know if I were Marvel if I would even try to get this franchise back.

Actually, on consideration, I can think of one way to do it- introduce each character separately in different movies (presumably movies centered on other characters) and establish them as competent and interesting characters in their own right, then contrive a reason to unite them.

Because as it stands the basic set-up is a hackneyed "Father Knows Best" nuclear family with powers that sound like they were generated with dice rolls and tables.

("I'm invisible? That's lame!"
"All right, all right, I'll let you roll for a second power."
"Hey! You didn't hear me complaining when I got stretchiness as a power...!"
"And your nemesis gets to roll three times on the major table."
"Aw, man...!")
 

Zontar

Mad Max 2019
Feb 18, 2013
4,931
0
0
Callate said:
Mildly disappointed, but not much surprised. But I've said before, I'm not at all sure The Fantastic Four is something that can or should be brought into the present day. Serious and quiet (and apparently, dull) is one way to try to fail, but if anything, I suspect a literal translation of its Silver Age-era cheesiness would fail even harder. If don't know if I were Marvel if I would even try to get this franchise back.
I have to disagree, just look at the Guardians of the Galaxy, they went full camp with it and it worked out great. A Fantastic Four movie done in the silver age style could work, and hell if anything the market shows that would probably be the best it could do since superhero movies as of late seem to have their honesty to the source material directly correlate with their success.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
So apparently the new Fant4stic is the Green Lantern of 2015
A lackluster movie that gets heaped with hate like it literally gave viewers cancer?

bartholen said:
By which I of course mean it's getting royally roasted in the reviews.
Close enough.

I have a feeling this is going to be one of those movies that I don't like, but won't understand the vitriol towards it.

Marter said:
It's usually a good sign when the studio tries to hide the film from basically everyone until the very last minute...
I was kinda shocked to see promo materials at all. And Dr. Kaku doing spots for it.

Callate said:
Mildly disappointed, but not much surprised. But I've said before, I'm not at all sure The Fantastic Four is something that can or should be brought into the present day. Serious and quiet (and apparently, dull) is one way to try to fail, but if anything, I suspect a literal translation of its Silver Age-era cheesiness would fail even harder. If don't know if I were Marvel if I would even try to get this franchise back.
Marvel scored a hit with Guardians of the Galaxy, which was actually a better FF movie than the prior two FF movies.

I would absolutely love to see them try to embrace the Silver-Age craziness of the FF comic. Even if they failed, I'd respect the attempt more than these non-Marvel movies which are totally ashamed of the source material.

Gearhead mk2 said:
Asita said:
OT: Was anyone surprised? I honestly can't think of anything I saw about this movie that made it look close to half decent. Everything they made to promote it reminded me of Man of Steel in all the wrong ways.
Eh. The trailers looked alright. Nothing particularly special, but not the godawful abomination people are making it out to be.

Then again, I still suspect there's plenty of overreacting going on.

"But Zachary!" I hear millions of people cry. "Overreacting on the internet is unheard of!"

Yes, but hear me out!
 

vallorn

Tunnel Open, Communication Open.
Nov 18, 2009
2,309
1
43
WolvDragon said:
Gee he's still ranting on The Amazing Spider-Man 2, no wonder I stopped watching MovieBob, he keeps on beating that dead horse.
That horse is probably the same consistency as the jam in Yahtzee's book now.

Really I saw absolutely nothing about this movie that led me to believe it would be decent. Green Lantern made me think it was kind of Space Opera esque and the suit looked decent-ish on posters (But in any film shot GUH! I DO NOT LIKE GREEN EGGS AND HAM! I DO NOT LIKE THEM SAM I AM!), but this? This movie had all the hallmarks of Fox just making a movie to keep the franchise rights and having no idea what to do with anything.

Meh, I have Ant Man and Resurrection: F to keep my movie cravings satiated. (The latter isn't too bad, It's a DBZ movie really.)
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Marter said:
It's usually a good sign when the studio tries to hide the film from basically everyone until the very last minute...

(It didn't even screen in my city; I'm only able to see it tonight.)
But you live in a metropolitan area!

Geez, when your movie isn't even screened in one of the Big Five cities in Canada, you know there's some big issues.
 

Saetha

New member
Jan 19, 2014
824
0
0
"Cheese-grater across the nuts." Man, I don't even have nuts and I still flinched at that image.

Guess I'll be waiting until The Man from Uncle comes out before I go back to the movie theater.
 

FPLOON

Your #1 Source for the Dino Porn
Jul 10, 2013
12,531
0
0
Aw shit! I saw all those reviews before clicking this thread! That will never happen again!

Also, as much as I wanted to give this movie the benefit of the doubt[footnote]Or, at least, the same benefit I gave to the last two FF movies when I finally saw them...[/footnote], it does suck that the closest I can get to thinking that this movie was even going to be good is through its trailers... *sighs* And it had such a good cast, too...

*thinks* Wait a minute... Isn't this movie still getting a sequel or what?
 

Nirallus

New member
Sep 18, 2014
58
0
0
Risking a cheap shot here, but the casting for the Invisible Woman was absolutely perfect:

 

gact

New member
May 26, 2014
74
0
0
By the reviews it seems they messed up dr Doom once again, it seems studios only see dr Doom as a evil guy with metal covering his body and some unexplained superpower, as if the character is only the super power, but the thing that makes dr Doom powerful and intimidating and probably the best comic book character ever is being dr Doom. Why I think this is because when I think what makes dr Doom OP is because he is dr Doom, not because he has a suit, or anything like that.

Giving dr Doom a half assed origin story will never suffice, if movie studios want to use dr Doom he must start the movie by already being dr Doom or by making a dr Doom movie first.
 

Mister K

This is our story.
Apr 25, 2011
1,703
0
0
spartenX said:
so the movie sucked.......Hey Vegeta, what the scouter say about my surprise level

Vegeta:"its......wait a second, scouters aren't supposed to go into the negatives"
Asita said:
Completely random thought: I suddenly want the inevitable reboot (because come on, they're going to keep trying until they get it right) to make naming the team a running gag. The characters start pitching names to one another at odd moments throughout the film.

Reed: How about Fire Storm? Get it, because your last name is-
Johnny: I get it. And no. Not unless we get to call you Rubber Richards.

*later*

Reed: Heatwave?
Johnny: Stretch Armstrong.

*action scene dies down*

Reed: Hot Flash!
*Johnny just gives Reed a confused and horrified stare*
*oblivious* Reed: Nah, doesn't really sound right.

Sue: What are you going to call yourself, Ben?
Ben: Eh, I'll think of something.
*cut to news report*
Reporter: And this behemoth, known only as "the Thing"
*Reed pats Ben on the shoulder sympathetically*
Oh you guys. I love you.

On-topic:
I am not all that surprised, to be honest. I mean:
- F4 are made into teenagers. It is not a bad thing in itself, but it did sound an alarm in my head, because one of the key things about F4 is family dynamics, with Rid and Sue being daddy and mommy, and Johnny and Ben being kind of like opposite uncles. I fail to imagine such thing with teens.
- Victor von Doom is not one of the greatest scientist on Earth, who is also one of the most powerful sorcerers, who also is a ruler of a coutry and has diplomatic immunity anymore. He is.. a dude? An angry internet dude who looks like some random Ulthron bot.
- Another thing about family. I feel like I am going to get some flak for it, but if you've decided to change the race of one sibling, please change race of the other one.
- This moive was kept under such a secret that it could be either one of the greatest things ever or a complete disaster. And considering that it is done by a studio who now is simply doing everything in it's power to not lose the rights to IP, I WAS leaning towards disaster variant.
- All the points that Jeremy Jahns and Chris Stuckmann made about how it is made more like a setup than an actual movie, how there is no chemistry between characters, how it is dark and gritty, etc.

I really, really, REALLY hope that Fox won't fuck up Deadpool.
 

Godzillarich(aka tf2godz)

Get the point
Legacy
Aug 1, 2011
2,946
523
118
Cretaceous
Country
USA
Gender
Dinosaur
I watched The Cinema Snob Review of the Roger Corman fantastic four which can be seen here
And looking back at it doesn't deserve to be called one of the worst comic book movies ever made. For one thing it's a fantastic four movie, It's the only one that gets Dr. doom right and most of the characters for that manner and it seems like the creators actually love the comic and wanted to make a great movie out of it but was fucked over by being part of a ploy to keep the rights.

What's this movies excuse?
 

Godzillarich(aka tf2godz)

Get the point
Legacy
Aug 1, 2011
2,946
523
118
Cretaceous
Country
USA
Gender
Dinosaur
MarsAtlas said:
Even the director is saying that the movie is awful. [http://deadline.com/2015/08/fantastic-four-director-josh-trask-youll-probably-never-see-my-good-version-1201494517/] Marter said on his twitter thats its as bad as Green Lantern.
Holy shit that's a new record for an old shame entry on TV tropes! Usually people wait a few years before regretting their work but this guy trash talked it opening night
 

Kenbo Slice

Deep In The Willow
Jun 7, 2010
2,706
0
41
Gender
Male
tf2godz said:
MarsAtlas said:
Even the director is saying that the movie is awful. [http://deadline.com/2015/08/fantastic-four-director-josh-trask-youll-probably-never-see-my-good-version-1201494517/] Marter said on his twitter thats its as bad as Green Lantern.
Holy shit that's a new record for an old shame entry on TV tropes! Usually people wait a few years before regretting their work but this guy trash talked it opening night
The director is saying it's not his fault it's awful. Funny, because I remember an interview from not too long ago where he said this was his vision for the movie.
 

FPLOON

Your #1 Source for the Dino Porn
Jul 10, 2013
12,531
0
0
MarsAtlas said:
FPLOON said:
*thinks* Wait a minute... Isn't this movie still getting a sequel or what?
Give it eight or nine years, unless Fox actually shares the rights with/sell the rights to Marvel Studios. This was made for the same reason that The Amazing Spider-Man was made, spite and brand recognition. Fox is still somewhat well with their X-Men stuff and they've got Deadpool on the way, so they're not as desperate to profit off of it as Sony is, not to mention that Marvel Studios would probably only be interested in acquiring the Fantastic Four IP to get Doom as a villain.
I was referring to this, unless this is some kind of "undisclosed placeholder" or something... Then again, I really stopped giving two shits about any of the licensing property bullshit between Marvel and Sony/Fox outside of who owns the movie version of Galactus at this point...
 

Elfgore

Your friendly local nihilist
Legacy
Dec 6, 2010
5,655
24
13
Is anyone really surprised? The first thing I remember hearing about it is how this was about "teens with disabilities, not heroes with awesome powers." Let's not forget our first look at Dr. Doom made him look like a homeless person cosplaying as him.

Until they either make a Fantastic Four movie that takes place years after they get their powers, or they give the IP to people who can actually make a movie. I doubt I'll see it.
 

Sarge034

New member
Feb 24, 2011
1,623
0
0
Tautology said:
Asita said:
Ok, for someone who didn't see the clip and hasn't seen the movie, I'm almost hesitant to ask, but I must know...what did they do to Doctor Doom?
Gaze and despair, true believer!
Wait... they made a Mass Effect movie and I didn't know about it? XD In all seriousness I'm not surprised the movie sucked but I was not expecting this level of suck. It's like the Spanish Inquisition of suck.