Won't be shooting in a game per se, I will sneak past them in Dishonored before preparing to go to Londen. Well unless I'm in the mood for Borderlands 2 again.
You put it much better than I can. And what you said gives me an idea, if as a gamer you feel that you do something to make a statement about this, a donation to Child's Play or another charity of your choice would be far more appropriate and helpful.ThisGuyLikesNoTacos said:I won't join because I can't see this as an actual act of respect, but as a way to make gamers look better in the eyes of others.
Why just shooters? I just imagine someone going: "Oh, we know that your children died, so we decided to stop playing shooters for friday. You know, since the guy used guns." It's just seems so thoughtless and trying to please the people who are blaming video games for this, instead of actually respecting the dead.
Why do we not stop playing all video games instead for the day? That is something that would effect all gamers. It's seems like a cop out, considering there are tons of video game genres besides shooters. How is reminding people that people were specifically shot respectful? We might as well send money to the families of the people who died.
Why do we focus on the killer instead of the dead again?
I'm not admitting games are responsible for this tragedy in any way by participating in this "ceasefire". Furthermore I'm not concerned that this will in any way be able to be used as an admission that violent video games are the cause of incidents like this, those that try to make that argument will be proven wrong like they always have been in the past.The Plunk said:You do realise that this will achieve precisely nothing, right? It will in no way help the grieving friends and families of the victims. It will in no way prevent a similar event from occurring again in the future. All it will do is give more fuel to the people who say that violent video games caused this.King Billi said:Believe it or not for some people this dosen't have anything to do with video games and the people who oppose them. For some people this is only about showing respect for those who have died.
Some people like to show compassion and sympathy by taking a moment out of their lives to offer condolences for the vicitms and their families of any tragedy. You are right that not everybody can actively effect change in the world but everyone is capable of showing compassion.
For some people this would done with a traditional moment of silence but for others choosing not the play a particular videogame is their sign of respect.
Offering sympathy however it may be done is never pointless but what you're doing is, stop thinking about yourself and your "precious" video games and recognise what this may actually be about for most people.
Yes, indeed they are.ResonanceSD said:Also, yeah, kneejerk reactions from the community are pretty much the least helpful responses to anything, ever.
Or maybe 1 night out of hundreds of gaming you can say, maybe I'll spend some time with my wife or with friends, things that actually matter when they are gone. Of course a night of gaming celibacy isnt going to bring those kids back, but how often do we cherish the things we have? Maybe some of the parents of those kids wish they had watched less TV and played a board game with their kid before they never saw them again. We all lead busy lives, and having occasions that allow us to reflect on what we have is nice. Maybe you reflect on the loved in your lives often, and props to you, I certainly know that I have a wife that loves the hell out of me and I certainly dont do enough to show her that I appreciate every minute of it.The Plunk said:As if Fox News cares about being proved wrong.King Billi said:I'm not admitting games are responsible for this tragedy in any way by participating in this "ceasefire". Furthermore I'm not concerned that this will in any way be able to be used as an admission that violent video games are the cause of incidents like this, those that try will be proven wrong like they always have been in the past.
Depriving yourself of something you enjoy that is completely unrelated to the tragedy shows respect for the victims in the same way that taking on a vow of chastity or self-flagellation shows respect.I repeat once again that this has nothing to do with videogames or the people who oppose them, this is soley about showing the proper respect to the victims of this tragedy.
Light a candle, pay respect in another way. Don't play a violent video game as a personal, I get why it can feel wrong after a violent tragedy to then immerse yourself in violent fiction. The two are obviously linked (no, not cause and effect) despite the knee jerk complete denial we as a community have.The Plunk said:I repeat once again that this has nothing to do with videogames or the people who oppose them, this is soley about showing the proper respect to the victims of this tragedy.
Well I was kinda joking but since you bring it up.Maze1125 said:Yes, a group is trying to honour 18 dead children, misguided or not, and your response is to do the exact opposite of their suggestion in order to spite them...Diddy_Mao said:I probably wouldn't have because I don't really play "shooters" to begin with
I suppose I can dust off my Xbox and that copy of Halo I never gave back to my co-worker and pretend to enjoy it out of spite for 30 minutes.
Yes, that is absolutely the best way to get people to believe that video-games aren't warping your mind...
Which do you think makes a "better" Fox News headline?The Plunk said:As if Fox News cares about being proved wrong.