That's what I meant by *genuine* loading screensCrono1973 said:You'll just see longer loading screens because longer ads = more money.EclipseoftheDarkSun said:If prices become almost negligible for games and the commercials are, say, during genuine loading screens that's okay I guess. But stopping the experience so companies can plug their rubbish, no way!
Because someone can't own more than one console? Or not be a rabid fanboy/girl?Syzygy23 said:Considering your avatar is also an xbox 360 avatar (which I'm assuming is yours) your opinion on anything Sony related is invalidated due to an obvious pre-existing bias. No matter HOW correct you happen to be.AndrewC said:Wow, I mean, I know Sony are stupid but are they really that thick?
If this goes ahead they can say goodbye to their consu- HEY TRY NEW GENERIC COLA 9999 CENTS- mer base.
Being a Marketing student, I have been told that these in-between ads, especially for online/on-demand content, have already been pretty much discredited as "best practice". For a reason. Maybe Sony just doesn't read the same journals I do...DustyDrB said:No. I don't hate ads. Put them before or after something, and I'm cool with that. I'm even fine with product placement to an extent. I tolerate commercials in TV because that's how it has always been (though I watch most shows via Netflix nowadays, so it's generally not even an issue there). I hate the idea of my gaming experience being interrupted by something totally unrelated. This just seems disrespectful to gamers and to the games. I promise I won't buy a Sony console that does this.
EclipseoftheDarkSun said:That's what I meant by *genuine* loading screensCrono1973 said:You'll just see longer loading screens because longer ads = more money.EclipseoftheDarkSun said:If prices become almost negligible for games and the commercials are, say, during genuine loading screens that's okay I guess. But stopping the experience so companies can plug their rubbish, no way!![]()
Heh. If Sony or any other company is stupid enough to try this, believe me, folks will start asking very quickly and start saying, "Y'know, I was going to buy your wonderful new product but it appears my enthusiasm has been permanently soiled now that I know that it has built-in spam which will interrupt my entertainment with pleas for money."Karloff said:After all, when you buy a media player, you don't ask where the manufacturer got their GPU.
Yea, but that became accepted pretty quickly, didn't it.Crono1973 said:EclipseoftheDarkSun said:That's what I meant by *genuine* loading screensCrono1973 said:You'll just see longer loading screens because longer ads = more money.EclipseoftheDarkSun said:If prices become almost negligible for games and the commercials are, say, during genuine loading screens that's okay I guess. But stopping the experience so companies can plug their rubbish, no way!![]()
...and I meant that's not going to happen. Like how genuine "made after the games release" DLC turned into DLC being made alongside the main game.
So... you didn't read the OP then?IamShmgeggy said:I wonder if they would make it pop up like in the virtual hud somewhere out of the way, like a dead space transmission. Not too big to be in the way, but big enough to make you notice. Either that or they could put in virtual billboards with ads that move. That would grab my attention enough to maybe want something. If the ads are well placed, and don't hinder gameplay, i'm all for it. But if they are loud and in the way, then i'll probably just stick to my PC and Vita.
I was well aware of what the OP said and what the Patent details are. I was merely stating what would be tolerable in my opinion. Honestly i think this is all rumors and nonsense til the next gen is announced. Everyone is up in arms about no used games, and new DRM. I say let em try. When every company goes bankrupt for trying to force stupid nonsense on customers, then maybe we can have a sayshrekfan246 said:So... you didn't read the OP then?IamShmgeggy said:I wonder if they would make it pop up like in the virtual hud somewhere out of the way, like a dead space transmission. Not too big to be in the way, but big enough to make you notice. Either that or they could put in virtual billboards with ads that move. That would grab my attention enough to maybe want something. If the ads are well placed, and don't hinder gameplay, i'm all for it. But if they are loud and in the way, then i'll probably just stick to my PC and Vita.
"According to the patent, you'll know it's happening when "the game slows down...the user knows to get ready for a commercial, the game then stops, and the commercial is played. After the commercial, the game resumes." In some instances the game "may resume by slowly starting again, which allows the user to remember where he or she was in the game.""
They're talking about literally stopping your game in the middle of you doing something like, say, making a pin-point jump to a ledge in Uncharted or trying to get the perfect snipe on somebody in Call of Duty, or surrounded by enemies in Dark Souls, so that they can show you an ad and then throw you back into the middle of what you were doing.
OT: Well, this helps further my believe that the video game industry is going to hit another massive crash any year now. Considering Nintendo still seem to be stuck in the methods of yesteryear, maybe they'll be able to pull us out of this one too, seeing as they're pretty much the only company in recent memory that haven't been acting like massive, greedy tossers.
Also, intentionally introducing lag into a game, saying nothing of a commercial following it, is a great way to royally piss off your customers. The PS3 has a lot of frame-rate issues with newer games as it is, and launch titles (assuming this would be implemented in the PS4) are typically pretty buggy and wonky too because developers are still getting the feel for the system. Don't compound the issue by introducing something that's effectively a virus.
I don't know much about patents but a 30 second timer isn't exactly hard to program. It's a few lines of code. I am not even sure you could patent a 30 second timer.GonzoGamer said:But people, PSN is freeeee, isn't it?
"Entitled" I've used it so much I don't know what it means anymore but I depend on it to win all my arguments so I'm just going to call you all entitled.
Yea, but that became accepted pretty quickly, didn't it.Crono1973 said:EclipseoftheDarkSun said:That's what I meant by *genuine* loading screensCrono1973 said:You'll just see longer loading screens because longer ads = more money.EclipseoftheDarkSun said:If prices become almost negligible for games and the commercials are, say, during genuine loading screens that's okay I guess. But stopping the experience so companies can plug their rubbish, no way!![]()
...and I meant that's not going to happen. Like how genuine "made after the games release" DLC turned into DLC being made alongside the main game.
They would need to patent something else to ensure loading screens last at least 30 seconds.
I don't even think I have any crappy free phone games that interrupt the game for an ad.
Every bit of news I hear about the new consoles makes me NOT want to get one. If they overestimate the loyalty of their user base again, we could see another crash and another ancient video game burial ground filled with PS4s and Xbox 720s.