The PS3 has more powerful and totally different hardware. Doesn't mean it can run a perfect PS2 emulator (in fact, it can't).Lunar Templar said:nope, by my understanding the PS3 has better hardware, so it was logical to assume the 'built in PS2 emulator costing to much' was a flimsy cop out.
The backwards compatibility was provided courtesy of a chip that Sony had managed to cram the entire PS2 hardware onto (not an emulator - the actual hardware). Extremely clever of them, but also expensive.
If you're Sony, which business decision would you make:
a) Get rid of BC and drop the price of the PS3 by over $100, thus opening the platform to a much larger user base, or
b) Keep the PS3 at a high price so it can keep the BC, and make less than 1% of the total PS3 users happy.
It's just common sense. Sorry you're so upset about it, but it's not a war on backwards compatibility... just a good business decision.