Currently, as I understand it, the argument Internet Kraken is presenting is that The Other M is less than brilliantly written, and that MovieBob's statement to the converse is in question for the reason that he is biased towards 2D side-scrolling Nintendo games. It's only fallacious if you attempt to fault someone's argument by pointing out a poor quality in them that doesn't pertain to their reasoning or argument.Sutter Cane said:But when you do that you aren't actually addressing the argument at all, and so it's not refuting anything, and because it doesn't address the argument itself, only the character of the person making it, shouldn't it be a fallacy?Sephychu said:No it isn't.Sutter Cane said:That's ad hominem. that's a logical fallacy. You Get Nothing, You LOSE Good Day Sir!Internet Kraken said:Actually, it would be very wise to ignore Movie Bob's opinion on the subject since has has proven himself time and time again to be an idiotic Nintendo fanboy. He may be better at articulating his thoughts than your average fanboy but he is just as dumb as they come when to comes to being irrational.Sutter Cane said:I think it would be unwise to ignore moviebob's opinion on the subject.
http://gameoverthinker.blogspot.com/2010/09/episode-40-heavens-to-metroid.html
i think he makes some points here in defense of the game worth responding to.
Metroid: Other M was a piece of crap. Even if you don't think it ruined Samus's character, that wouldn't change that the writing and voice acting is still awful so the story is shit anyways. The only reason Movie Bob thinks it's so great is becuase it's not an FPS like the Prime trilogy, which he dismisses as inferior simply becuase he seems to hate all FPS games. The fact that he considers it a bold move to switch Metroid back to it's original side-scroller format is a testament to this. He acts like Retro was just dumbing down the franchise when they made it into an FPS for more appeal.
To say that you should ignore his opinion on cake because he's a terrible liar would be ad hominem.
It isn't ad hominem if the flaw which someone is pointing out pertains to the point they're trying to devalue.
If you don't think someone's opinion on Nintendo games is valid because they have draconian preconceptions of Nintendo games, that's logically sound.
Yeah the other parts of his argument aren't bad IMHO it's just the "He's biased so therefore anthing he says must be wrong" implication that seems to be given by his wording, his actual quote beingSephychu said:Currently, as I understand it, the argument Internet Kraken is presenting is that The Other M is less than brilliantly written, and that MovieBob's statement to the converse is in question for the reason that he is biased towards 2D side-scrolling Nintendo games. It's only fallacious if you attempt to fault someone's argument by pointing out a poor quality in them that doesn't pertain to their reasoning or argument.Sutter Cane said:But when you do that you aren't actually addressing the argument at all, and so it's not refuting anything, and because it doesn't address the argument itself, only the character of the person making it, shouldn't it be a fallacy?Sephychu said:No it isn't.Sutter Cane said:That's ad hominem. that's a logical fallacy. You Get Nothing, You LOSE Good Day Sir!Internet Kraken said:Actually, it would be very wise to ignore Movie Bob's opinion on the subject since has has proven himself time and time again to be an idiotic Nintendo fanboy. He may be better at articulating his thoughts than your average fanboy but he is just as dumb as they come when to comes to being irrational.Sutter Cane said:I think it would be unwise to ignore moviebob's opinion on the subject.
http://gameoverthinker.blogspot.com/2010/09/episode-40-heavens-to-metroid.html
i think he makes some points here in defense of the game worth responding to.
Metroid: Other M was a piece of crap. Even if you don't think it ruined Samus's character, that wouldn't change that the writing and voice acting is still awful so the story is shit anyways. The only reason Movie Bob thinks it's so great is becuase it's not an FPS like the Prime trilogy, which he dismisses as inferior simply becuase he seems to hate all FPS games. The fact that he considers it a bold move to switch Metroid back to it's original side-scroller format is a testament to this. He acts like Retro was just dumbing down the franchise when they made it into an FPS for more appeal.
To say that you should ignore his opinion on cake because he's a terrible liar would be ad hominem.
It isn't ad hominem if the flaw which someone is pointing out pertains to the point they're trying to devalue.
If you don't think someone's opinion on Nintendo games is valid because they have draconian preconceptions of Nintendo games, that's logically sound.
In this case, Kraken points out that MovieBob has previously shown traits that link with undue bias which, while totally allowed, throws into question the possibility of his view being an objective one 'worth listening to' in defence of the game, as his bias might cause him to overlook poor writing in favour of the rose-tint of his glasses.
So far as I understand.
While Internet Kraken says that he is more articulate than other fanboys, he never actually brings up or refutes any of the arguments Bob brings up in the video, choosing to find them not even worthy of bringing up to to actual or perceived bias and goes on to argue for this bias instead of against the points bo makes, which is a bit of a red herring IMHO. If he had actually refuted or tried to refute bob's argument about how the different characterization of Samus didn't ruin her character, i wouldn't have said he committed a fallacy, but since he didn't (in fact the only thing from bob's video he brings up is that he didn't care that much for the prime series because he's not an FPS fan) I did.it would be very wise to ignore Movie Bob's opinion on the subject since has has proven himself time and time again to be an idiotic Nintendo fanboy
I feel like I should probably explain why I find Movie Bob to be so biased and thus an bad source on things like this. Really atching any of his videos that involve Nintendo or games he hates (Halo) will show you his bias, but I feel that the best way to understand is to watch this;Sephychu said:No it isn't.
To say that you should ignore his opinion on cake because he's a terrible liar would be ad hominem.
It isn't ad hominem if the flaw which someone is pointing out pertains to the point they're trying to devalue.
If you don't think someone's opinion on Nintendo games is valid because they have draconian preconceptions of Nintendo games, that's logically sound.
What exactly was wrong with that video, he provides an explanation of common fanboy behavior, and even takes a few cracks at the nintendo fanboy crowd, and he always makes sure to back up his opinions with reasons, and makes arguments instead of just spewing rhetoric like many on the internet. I think that he makes some good points in the Other M video that are worth addressing even if you disagree with them. Just like I incerdibly disagree with bob's "Worst Person" i still think he brings up interesting points that are worth discussing, not just dismissing them without coming up with actual reasons why his points are wrongInternet Kraken said:-snip-
Because it shows he how subscribes to that mindset, and how painfully obvious his bias is as a result. If you obsess over the "good old days" as much as he does than of course you're going to like Other M just because it returns to classic Metroid format. However you're also going to ignore the obvious problems with the game as a result, so you should probably just keep your mouth shut. Of course Movie Bob thinks his opinion is golden and rants about how wonderful the game is and how we're all just overreacting.Sutter Cane said:What exactly was wrong with that video, he provides an explanation of common fanboy behavior, and even takes a few cracks at the nintendo fanboy crowd, and he always makes sure to back up his opinions with reasons, and makes arguments instead of just spewing rhetoric like many on the internet. I think that he makes some good points in the Other M video that are worth addressing even if you disagree with them. Just like I incerdibly disagree with bob's "Worst Person" i still think he brings up interesting points that are worth discussing, not just dismissing them without coming up with actual reasons why his points are wrong
Way to make hasty generalizations there about the psychiatrist there. I don't think i read that article, so i don't have an opinion on him as i don't have enough information to form a good one. Also, comparing a psychiatrist to moviebob is a terrible comparison. One was saying something that could be proven or disproved by science, and one is a guy on the internet talking about his subjective opinion on a subject. Also you seem to be dismissing moviebob's arguments purely on the basis of, he has a different opinion on the direction gaming should be going than me. IMHO you're coming off as way more biased than bob right now with all of the insults you have been flinging around in this thread. And yes, Bob does have a bias, but so does EVERYONE ELSE. The fact that he does have a bias does not mean that he cannot make good arguments for his points (which he frequently provides).Internet Kraken said:Because it shows he how subscribes to that mindset, and how painfully obvious his bias is as a result. If you obsess over the "good old days" as much as he does than of course you're going to like Other M just because it returns to classic Metroid format. However you're also going to ignore the obvious problems with the game as a result, so you should probably just keep your mouth shut. Of course Movie Bob thinks his opinion is golden and rants about how wonderful the game is and how we're all just overreacting.Sutter Cane said:What exactly was wrong with that video, he provides an explanation of common fanboy behavior, and even takes a few cracks at the nintendo fanboy crowd, and he always makes sure to back up his opinions with reasons, and makes arguments instead of just spewing rhetoric like many on the internet. I think that he makes some good points in the Other M video that are worth addressing even if you disagree with them. Just like I incerdibly disagree with bob's "Worst Person" i still think he brings up interesting points that are worth discussing, not just dismissing them without coming up with actual reasons why his points are wrong
I don't consider Movie Bob to be a credible source, so I'm not going to waste my time watching his video again. Just like I'm sure you didn't read everything that psychiatrist said and instead dismissed him solely because he claimed videos game are like cocaine. When someone says something horribly stupid like that it's perfectly acceptable to not treat them as a valid source, which is what I do with Movie Bob.
But if you really think he raises good points then you should restate them here. I'm not wasting my time watching the rantings of a fanboy again.
... Didn't I just said that the whole arguement about game being sexist is delusional?Carlos Alexandre said:Japan enforcing its societal views on an audience that SHOULD know that said views are contrived and chauvinistic.
Japan having done this for years via other games and its storytelling (read: anime).
People continuing to lap it up like it's fountain of youth water.
MrHero17 said:Since Kraken doesn't want to get into specifics over movebobs video(and I understand why) I'll take a stab at something from it that really pissed me off when I watched it(which was a a couple of months ago).
Doesn't bob make the point that the fans who are upset with what MM did to samus's character are upset because they had wanted her to be an ice queen or a female master-chief and when they saw that the game didn't present her like that they immediately hated it? This really peeved me when I was watching since bob was making an assumption about me with that claim and it simply wasn't true. I won't get too specific into my idea of what samus is so I'll just say that in my mind she was a very strong and heroic woman, someone who would be looked up to by others. Thous are more character traits than personality traits but regardless M
M really takes a dump on them.
So that was my take on the game whereas moviebob apparently thought the story was really good and that any previous fans who didn't like it just wanted samus to be an ice-queen who kills shit because it's fun.
In closing, fuck everything moviebob said about other M.
The Prime trilogy is absolutely amazing, especially 3. 3 is by far one of the best Metroid games out there. In the all-for-one package, they implement nice controls with the Wiimote, but also take out a few small things like how in depth the cannons shoot. It's nothing ground-breaking.Azex said:how is the prime trilogy btw? im thinking of buying that 3 in 1 deal for wii