Sometimes spanking is justified if they´re being really bratty.But... If i was a parent, i´d try to punish my kids in other ways.Taking away stuff they like might prove more successful.
Where did you get evidence from? I'm asking how to discipline a kid without physical harm. You didn't like the what-if so I gave you an actual scenario, but how would you have handled that? I'm in the minority of your research, and I don't see any other way. So would you at least give your more educated opinion?Koroviev said:You are correct, I am not a fan of anecdotes as evidence.TehCookie said:You said you didn't like the usage of anecdotes but I was referring to myself anonymously as a child.Koroviev said:In the absence of support, "what ifs" don't amount to much of a counterargument.TehCookie said:You say you should reward the child for good behavior, what if the child is already happy with what they have and doesn't want anything more?Koroviev said:-snip-
If you were going to punish/discipline the kid how would you do it effectively? For examples sake let's say the kid will ignore anything you say (kids do that).
Alright as I child I was happy with my computer and my ps2, I never felt like I needed anything more than that so any attempt of reward my parents tried to give me I didn't care about I was content with what I had. When they got fed up with my grades dropping they tried grounding me or taking away my computer, needless to say it all failed. I didn't listen and I didn't obey. If they put me in a corner I'd just walk away. To prevent me from using my computer they locked it with a password and took the power cable and turned off the circuit breaker. It wasn't hard for me to turn it back on find a spare cable and guess the password. Also words didn't have any effect on my, good job and bad job were just words (and to really annoy my parents when they started yelling I would just recite the sticks and stones saying). What would you do with a brat like that?
After a month of this my mom bent me over her lap and spanked me. I quickly learned after that I should listen to her if I wanted to avoid any more pain. To me, that was way more effective than anything else they've tried.
What evidence do you want? I guess you can read up on <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operant_conditioning>operant conditioning if that will help. Negative reinforcement is just taking away something unfavorable to increase the likely hood a behavior is done. I guess the example would work better if the not spanking days couldn't be so frequent. Let's say a kid gets spanked at 3pm except on days he gets a paid extra for mowing his neighbors lawn. Actually, that works better. The kid will work hard so he doesn't get spanked and the varied scheduled of reward is a nice touch too.Koroviev said:I understand your reasoning. However, in the absence of evidence, I cannot concede that punishment applied with a certain frequency becomes negative reinforcement.
Actually, right and wrong are somewhat subjective. It may be right for a child to talk to strangers in one culture but frowned upon in the next. If they know right and wrong by then it is because they were taught it. I don't know about you, but I know I didn't have a concept of ownership when I was 5.pulse2 said:I think there are limitations to spanking, I don't think there is any justification is smacking a little child. I think by the time you are five you are old enough to understand right and wrong.
You know, you keep running circles and chasing your own tail about this. You keep saying research doesnt support my answer. well thats graet, but yhave you ever seen research? Research is controlled. Variables dont affect it. Control groups are kept away from each other. In the REAL world, where most of live, instead of out of college psychology books, things like that are never so perfect. Groups mix. Kids who are spanked interact with kids that arent, and when they hear that they arent being spanked, they think, "Gee, they took away my toy but so what. they're not hitting me. whats a toy to me, i have more, or i can wait." When the kid knows that they will burt hit, that they will Feel, the discipline, they wont chance it.Koroviev said:It may mean a lot to you in forming an opinion, however, that does not change the fact that it is poor support for an opinion.emeraldrafael said:But it does. This is opinion, and personal experience is everything. NO one here really ever quotes psychological studies for their point, because no one cares for them. the fact is, psych studies in themselves are useless, since they so rapidly chnage and never really apply to anything when person experience dictates how they will raise someone.
That most people here are supposedly not interested in supporting their opinions does not make it good practice. If that is your point, then the argument in favor of it is fallacious.
And you are not the first person to make that claim. It remains unsupported, to my knowledge.
I'm not a certified expert myself, so for this I will rely on a credible source.TehCookie said:Where did you get evidence from? I'm asking how to discipline a kid without physical harm. You didn't like the what-if so I gave you an actual scenario, but how would you have handled that? I'm in the minority of your research, and I don't see any other way. So would you at least give your more educated opinion?
Time out for a second. When did I say that "research" doesn't support your point?emeraldrafael said:You know, you keep running circles and chasing your own tail about this. You keep saying research doesnt support my answer. well thats graet, but yhave you ever seen research? Research is controlled. Variables dont affect it. Control groups are kept away from each other. In the REAL world, where most of live, instead of out of college psychology books, things like that are never so perfect. Groups mix. Kids who are spanked interact with kids that arent, and when they hear that they arent being spanked, they think, "Gee, they took away my toy but so what. they're not hitting me. whats a toy to me, i have more, or i can wait." When the kid knows that they will burt hit, that they will Feel, the discipline, they wont chance it.Koroviev said:It may mean a lot to you in forming an opinion, however, that does not change the fact that it is poor support for an opinion.emeraldrafael said:But it does. This is opinion, and personal experience is everything. NO one here really ever quotes psychological studies for their point, because no one cares for them. the fact is, psych studies in themselves are useless, since they so rapidly chnage and never really apply to anything when person experience dictates how they will raise someone.
That most people here are supposedly not interested in supporting their opinions does not make it good practice. If that is your point, then the argument in favor of it is fallacious.
And you are not the first person to make that claim. It remains unsupported, to my knowledge.
Well, there's reasoning, and then there's evidence. I think your reasoning is strong. Nevertheless, as strong as your reasoning is, I feel that I need evidence to ascertain your assertion. It is by all means reasonable, but that does not necessarily mean it is supported.crudus said:What evidence do you want? I guess you can read up on <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operant_conditioning>operant conditioning if that will help. Negative reinforcement is just taking away something unfavorable to increase the likely hood a behavior is done. I guess the example would work better if the not spanking days couldn't be so frequent. Let's say a kid gets spanked at 3pm except on days he gets a paid extra for mowing his neighbors lawn. Actually, that works better. The kid will work hard so he doesn't get spanked and the varied scheduled of reward is a nice touch too.Koroviev said:I understand your reasoning. However, in the absence of evidence, I cannot concede that punishment applied with a certain frequency becomes negative reinforcement.
you've said it every person that disagrees, only you called it "evidence" whihc is from your original source of research done on the subject.Koroviev said:Snip
I don't mean that sort of right and wrong, the basic things, 'don't touch' being one, 'don't spit' being another and you can sort of get the idea from there.crudus said:Actually, right and wrong are somewhat subjective. It may be right for a child to talk to strangers in one culture but frowned upon in the next. If they know right and wrong by then it is because they were taught it. I don't know about you, but I know I didn't have a concept of ownership when I was 5.pulse2 said:I think there are limitations to spanking, I don't think there is any justification is smacking a little child. I think by the time you are five you are old enough to understand right and wrong.
Ask aynone with kids. They'll push the boundaries. its part of the growing up and learning limits phase. when they finally learn the worst that can happen that they experience, tehy stop.Fagotto said:Snip
Are you referring to anecdotal evidence? Come to think of it, that is a bit of a misnomer. While it is referred to as anecdotal evidence, it really isn't much in the way of evidence. Within the scope of an argument, anecdotal "evidence" is best suited for making a point relevant, while actual research factually supports the point. I'd never even thought about that. Good point.emeraldrafael said:you've said it every person that disagrees, only you called it "evidence" whihc is from your original source of research done on the subject.Koroviev said:Snip
Fixed the link for you, and it might have been better to use a real example instead of acting.Dimensional Vortex said:There are easier ways but spanking is often easier because talking to a child often will not work. A lot of you children will be persistently stubborn to their ideas, even if the idea is terrible. A lot of people might find spanking a bit gratuitous but it is often for the best, so a child won't grow up into an idiotic pig who gets what they want when they want it.
spanking would have been the best option.
You're misinterpreting the point of that commercial. Clearly they want you to wrap it! D=<TehCookie said:Fixed the link for you, and it might have been better to use a real example instead of acting.Dimensional Vortex said:There are easier ways but spanking is often easier because talking to a child often will not work. A lot of you children will be persistently stubborn to their ideas, even if the idea is terrible. A lot of people might find spanking a bit gratuitous but it is often for the best, so a child won't grow up into an idiotic pig who gets what they want when they want it.
spanking would have been the best option.
Then again some people say that is acting, but if you watch the other videos you realize that kid is just mental.
I agree with what you say and I wouldn't say that a large part of my development as a child attributes to the spanking I recieved, like I've said, the spanking I recieved went hand in hand with the love, care and affection I recieved and of course those positives had a larger share on my positive outcome, and yes, not in all cases is spanking necessary, neither do all children push the boundaries. But in the rare case, some children do, like I said, I myself did it, in fact, the only person I ever listened to was my mother, and even she had a hard time with me. Admittedly I was expelled from several primary schools for my extreme temper tantrums (which resulted in one school having its books torn and its fish tank smashed). So seeing as my mother used to get my attention with a good smack on my bottom when I wasn't listening and then turn me towards her face, come down to my level and speak to me firmly, I'd say it had an effect on my up bringing.Fagotto said:I think people jump the gun when they attribute their good behavior to spanking. Can they really be so sure it wasn't just them gaining a bit more maturity? I am really skeptical people would so easily be able to analyze themselves without a big heaping of bias. To eradicate bias and to account for variation I would think you'd need to resort to an actual study.