You said hes been waiting since 1997. I asked for what, and what was your point? Since its been out for PC since 1998 and bug fixes and improvements have been around for a long time, so what hes been "waiting for" is unclear. Because I do not believe for 1 second that someone who would have been waiting since "1997" doesn't know about such things.Glademaster said:girzwald said:Again, what is your point? Hes been waiting since 1997.....for what? What "big leap of logic" are you not making? If hes been waiting for a PC release, he only had to wait 1 year after the PSX release. Since its been out since 1998. And its worked and still works on modern PC's due to user patches.Glademaster said:My point was him saying he was waiting for the PC release is not a big leap of logic.girzwald said:So whats your point? The game was bug ridden ( not really, and there are plenty of user patches to fix these bugs ) so...........what?Glademaster said:He said waiting since 1997 and given that the game came out in 1997 it isn't that big of a leap to make especially since the PC release was quite bug ridden. It makes newly released Bethesda games look stable in comparison.girzwald said:You drew all that from what he said? That's quite a lot of in between the lines reading.robert01 said:I think he meant it being on PC(which it always has been, same as FFVIII). It was just that the games didn't have the same commercial success on the PC because they were plagued with a lot of technical issues.girzwald said:Just curious, what are you so excited about? You obviously have already played and likely own a copy of FF7 in some fashion. So, you are excited about....................... what? Achievements? Character boost? Cloud saving? Here is an answer to those.Kenjitsuka said:HALLELUJA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SOOO happy right now
Waiting since 1997, Square!
Who cares. Stop being bad. Get a bigger HD.
And I'm pretty sure that's not why they had low commercial success. The internet was just coming out of its infancy and the way games are reviewed and picked apart now, isn't the way it used to be. I doubt few people "read a review" or saw that it had "technical issues" and then said "well forget that!". It probably had low success because the PS version came out first and then the PC version came out. And at the time, it required a semi powerful computer and graphics card. Which probably also kept a lot of people from buying it.Also Valve still have to buy keys off them so if Valve are selling it below price as a loss leader and losing money it is their fault.Bhaalspawn said:Because then they have to split the money with Valve, and run the risk of Newell saying "Fuck it, let's give it away for $1.50. Frankly, if I were a developer, I wouldn't do business with Valve.Glademaster said:They could always do both and I don't see why not. For those that like every single game to be on Steam they could sell it to them on Steam while everyone else can just get it via their website.AzrealMaximillion said:I'd rather not see a Steam release for this. I'd like to be able play FF7 on my PC without needing to be online. Not that Steam is bad for that but the odd time that my internet conks out with my PC off would make me displeased.Skratt said:No steam release? bah
OT: I've lost interest in any Square-Enix game that doesn't let me beat my enemies to death with my car keys.
Again, what point about are you trying to make?That is exactly what you said in reply to this.You drew all that from what he said? That's quite a lot of in between the lines reading.
I am saying that is not a lot of reading in between the lines to see that the original person in this quote chain might be excited for an official non bug ridden PC re-release. I don't see how I can make it any clearer. I already stated my point thrice now.I think he meant it being on PC(which it always has been, same as FFVIII). It was just that the games didn't have the same commercial success on the PC because they were plagued with a lot of technical issues.
You then said him waiting for "the" PC release was not a big leap of logic. That is not a point, that is a reiteration of your non point.