Linux vs Windows is always a heated discussion.
Which is better? Well define better.
In terms of application availability for the general consumer, not to mention games, Windows does take the lead.
Linux is better in the sense that it has been designed better, it is much less bloated from installation, the file system is more effective and so on. While many developers swear to linux, it hasn't gained any mainstream adoption on the desktop. This is mostly due to applications not being ported to it.
Will it be better for games? In theory yes. If someone (Microsoft) were to release a DirectX runtime for linux, then one could build a more stable, more streamlined gaming machine, since linux requires less services and such to run.
Windows does not use resources less effectively, it just has more components. You have all these services targeted at the corporate business model, you have a lot services targeting legacy software, DRM and security. All these things would eventually make it to linux should it get a broader adoption.
Which is better? Well define better.
In terms of application availability for the general consumer, not to mention games, Windows does take the lead.
Linux is better in the sense that it has been designed better, it is much less bloated from installation, the file system is more effective and so on. While many developers swear to linux, it hasn't gained any mainstream adoption on the desktop. This is mostly due to applications not being ported to it.
Will it be better for games? In theory yes. If someone (Microsoft) were to release a DirectX runtime for linux, then one could build a more stable, more streamlined gaming machine, since linux requires less services and such to run.
Windows does not use resources less effectively, it just has more components. You have all these services targeted at the corporate business model, you have a lot services targeting legacy software, DRM and security. All these things would eventually make it to linux should it get a broader adoption.