Facepalm.Jove said:Oh, its because Windows is too mainstreamed isn't it? And using an OS to limit yourself with will stick it to the man right? Never mind I got it now.
I don't mean to sound rude, but I don't know if you are trolling or not....Vanitas likes Bubbles said:Bit of a noob question I know but, what's a Linux?
Are you sure? I thought only X and above was unix. 1-9 didn't have an accessible command terminal, not to mention a primitive memory allocation system.MorganL4 said:I feel it is important to note, that the Mac OS be it 1,2,3.....9 or OS X are all UNIX distributions.
Correct. Everything before OS X was completely unrelated. The only Apple hardware I can think of off the top of my head from that time period that officially ran anything Unix-based/Unix-like before OS X came out was a little bit of obscure PowerPC stuff in the 90s that they sold with a version of AIX.wizzy555 said:Are you sure? I thought only X and above was unix. 1-9 didn't have an accessible command terminal, not to mention a primitive memory allocation system.MorganL4 said:I feel it is important to note, that the Mac OS be it 1,2,3.....9 or OS X are all UNIX distributions.
Err, no that's not the point of linux. Although there is no terribly good reason an app shouldn't work on another distribution with some tweaking. Normally apps will come in at least two varieties, a debian install package or a yum install package.Steve the Pocket said:EDIT: Oh, and apparently they're only targeting one distribution even? How does that even work? I thought the whole point of Linux is that every app can run on any distro. Have they really become so fragmented that you can't do that anymore? Good lord.
Yeah, sry looks like I made a mistake there, the originals were based off of Lisa OS, which what what Wozniak developed for the Lisa back in 1983. They also took from xerox parc. My mistake.Nalgas D. Lemur said:Correct. Everything before OS X was completely unrelated. The only Apple hardware I can think of off the top of my head from that time period that officially ran anything Unix-based/Unix-like before OS X came out was a little bit of obscure PowerPC stuff in the 90s that they sold with a version of AIX.wizzy555 said:Are you sure? I thought only X and above was unix. 1-9 didn't have an accessible command terminal, not to mention a primitive memory allocation system.MorganL4 said:I feel it is important to note, that the Mac OS be it 1,2,3.....9 or OS X are all UNIX distributions.
You forgot everything that was sold in the Humble Indie Bundle, for those all have a Linux release already.Aeshi said:Of course being able to play games on Linux and having games to play on Linux are two different things. I'm willing to be Steams 'Linux' section will have the Source Games and nothing else.
Not a guarantee, at least a couple of the Indie bundle games on Steam are still Windows-only despite having OSX versions.iniudan said:You forgot everything that was sold in the Humble Indie Bundle, for those all have a Linux release already.Aeshi said:Of course being able to play games on Linux and having games to play on Linux are two different things. I'm willing to be Steams 'Linux' section will have the Source Games and nothing else.
Actually I would say most user are not, especially the management, since those have the power to fire or make your job hell over their own selfish hardware and software need, while not giving you budget to get thing working correctly, so you end up doing patchwork to get their thing working, instead of a well integrated solution if they had been consulting the IT department. But I work in IT, so I kind of got a biased opinion. =pTwilight_guy said:Also, both sides of the OS argument need to stop being pretentious douches and realize that everyone is old enough to choose there own OS and don't need you argue why there decision is wrong.
I wouldn't be so sure in the case of Stallman. But mostly agree with you. =)dobahci said:It wasn't created by anti-corporate hipster luddites who wanted to "stick it to the man."
"Humble"- He said "Humble Indie Bundle" - as sold at http://humblebundle.com/ ... not just "indie bundle" ... The HIB sale requirement is that there must be Win/Lin/Mac versions available to qualify. This is one of the reasons Unity3D is being released for Linux, to give Unity's customers the opportunity to be included in HIB sales.Aeshi said:Not a guarantee, at least a couple of the Indie bundle games on Steam are still Windows-only despite having OSX versions.iniudan said:You forgot everything that was sold in the Humble Indie Bundle, for those all have a Linux release already.Aeshi said:Of course being able to play games on Linux and having games to play on Linux are two different things. I'm willing to be Steams 'Linux' section will have the Source Games and nothing else.
Back in 93 i was using my Amiga 1200 which came with a hardwired windows system which was about as complex as win 97. two years later microsoft invented windows and gave us win 95. from then on in microsoft used theft theft threats and a lot of luck (managed to get ibm to sign an exclusive distribution deal) to become the monopoly it is today.Jove said:I'm confused, whats good about Linux again?
Oh, its because Windows is too mainstreamed isn't it? And using an OS to limit yourself with will stick it to the man right? Never mind I got it now.
Ya know, he's said some things in interviews, that while sounding perfectly rational to a cracker like me, have gotten him labeled as an Uncle Tom.DVS BSTrD said:Morgan Freeman feels compassion for all things.blindthrall said:Where's the tragedy in that?DVS BSTrD said:Actually, at the time everyone was going on about how they would be abandoning Windows.blindthrall said:You're saying Linux won't survive? Do you know how long Linux has been around for?DVS BSTrD said:The March of the PC Gamers.
Tragically, this OS, will not survive.
Except whitey.
As much as I love Linux, that's its main flaw. Most people aren't software engineers or computer scientists and as such don't really know what documentation is, where it is, how to read it and who to implement it. Most people just want something that works without you having to tinker with it.Matthi205 said:1)If it ran "pretty crappy" YOU were the one responsible for it . There is a ton of documentation on linux configuration . If something doesn't work properly - disable it .Elate said:I just.. Fail to see any upside of using it rather than windows.