Here's the problem
An, "Anti gaming" study likely has stronger names because there is an agenda to "Prove (God, I hate that word in Social Sciences) that they are harmful. Legitimate individuals find a CORRELATION, and report such.
Slightly less credible, but still quite credible, individuals do a "Pro game" study that show no CAUSATION between video games and violence.
Those anti-gaming studies are more reliable because the label, "Anti-gaming" is applied by people who have no idea what the results of those studies actually mean. Its a very clever way to lie with Statistics, and Im not encouraged, because I probably wouldn't have been able to catch that lie until very late in my undergrad. In reality, when you actually look at, and properly interpreter, the studies themselves, ypu see that there is no danger posed by games.
And if there are, I would like to follow up this case trying to get games like football banned from high schools, and banning sale of shoulder pads to minors, because I can all but guarantee that any harmful causation between video games and violence is doubled when you look at sports. Can someone start trying to censor Football so we can establish a precedent?