gphjr14 said:
I was thinking the same thing. He's just digging himself a deeper hole for Sony to bury him in. He should've just bought the damn thing and played games on it.
I wish I could file suit for his horrible rapping.
Actually I thought it was fairly good, particularly for someone who is probably a rank novice at busting rhymes.
And you seem maybe to be unfamiliar with Sony's past record in this regard, upto and including unleashing dangerous rootkits on the computers of people who LEGALLY bought their "enhanced" music CDs and LEGALLY put them into their computers. They're far from being sweetness and light, and I'm very much on his side here. He bought the computer hardware. The licensing agreement, as far as I've seen suggested (i don't have a copy, or the time to read it, I'm afraid) only applies to the operating system on that machine. They may have a lockout system in place to stop people running different software on it (much as Nintendo did with their lockout chips on the NES, SNES, N64 and had to be similarly circumvented if you wanted to play something not released in your abitarily-defined region... ditto DVD regions) but it's not necessarily legally binding (both those other cases would probably fall foul of the DMCA if this does... so serve me a subpoena and extradition order for using a engineer's test code typed in via my remote, or custom firmware uploaded off a CDR, to play my legally purchased but only-ever-released-in-region-1 DVDs in my region 2 player, why don't you? That's not "permitted software", either!).
In cases of devices specifically aimed at piracy, and not even marketed as ways to play your legally bought games off disposable "backups" instead of risking damage to the master disc (pretty sure that's legal under fair use?), then yeah ... you don't have a leg to stand on, must take your chances and fold as soon as the second or third C&D letter comes in. But when it's more of a general hacker tool ... no-ones saying it can ONLY be used for copyright breaches, now, can it? Dude just wants to run Linux on it and access some of that supposedly hardcore Cell processing power for some custom application, like the US Military did. Or whatever.
By your argument, if I buy a car or motorcycle I should "ONLY" use it for driving in strict accordance with everything in the user manual, never attempt any servicing of my own (or take it to a non-dealership mechanic), or modify it in any way, other than maybe some decorative stickers. Adding an aftermarket stereo system (because the existing one lacks both a CD player and Digital Broadcast reception), changing the sprocket ratios on the bike (e.g. because it's too fizzy for cruising, or too lazy for life in a mountainous area)*, or fitting winter tyres to either would be right out.
Or heck, with my old (SONY!!) minidisc player and (SONY!!) CD player with digital output, I should only have played store-bought music minidiscs instead of copying my CD albums, and only ever have used the optical link to transfer my own independently-made recordings from a CDR-based 4-track substitute (or burned such onto CD from a PC one), instead of making compilations from my album collection. Home taping/discing is killing music after all. No wait, it isn't, the industry is about as strong and vibrant as it's ever been, and an incredible number of artists have got their start or built up a fandom from "you gotta hear this!" tape bootlegs and the like.
And in no circumstance should I carry out my plan to buy a particular model of (again, SONY!!) hi-fi Minidisc deck in order to rescue an actual live recording made of a college friend doing a gig in a local bar some years back, which I made on my portable MD recorder with a condenser mic, but the machine chewed up because of some fault when the time came to write the TOC... (the data's still on there, just the disc appears blank: the only hope of rescue is "hacking" the seperates deck such to abuse it's service mode and write a dummy full-disc TOC onto it) ... or then use third party "hacker" software to transfer said recording digitally to the PC at full volume, because Sony's overly restrictive built-in controls prohibit me from doing that "legally" even though it's MY RECORDING OF SOMEONE I KNOW and their own hardware puts out such a comically low line-level output (this was the era that their old and really rather brilliant AVLS dynamic-volume-limiting circuitry was downgraded to a switch that stopped you turning the volume up past a certain level... and then was done away with altogether in favour of permanently reduced output) that it's damn near impossible to record it to the PC in analogue mode without an intolerable amount of noise coming with.
If I'd used some other digital system, e.g. DAT, I could have made as many copies as I liked either way, and no-one would care. I am in fact using a modern SD-card based high quality audio recorder right now to recover stuff from old and damn-near-worn out audio CDRs** that I don't have in any other format (thanks to a hard disc crash and the backup drives being stolen) and no easily accessible optical drive will successfully copy in digital mode - and the makers of said device (a major international audio electronics and musical instrument manufacturer) have NO qualms whatsoever about allowing me to do so. It's my own responsibility if I use it to pirate material off of commercial releases, and their hands are clean - I'm still open to prosecution if I do that, anyway. No stupid e-handcuffs that have to be broken (an act that violates DMCA?) in order to use the device to its full, legal potential. Presumably they take the (valid) line that if I'm doing that, there are far easier, cheaper, and pre-existing ways of doing so anyway (not like Minidisc had the world's best sound quality up until the early 2000s either!) so why bother?
So in summary... screw you and your stupid, corporate sheep mentality. I wouldn't be overly surprised if we analysed the logs and found a lot of posts coming from an IP corresponding to Sony's corporate HQ at this point. Their crap may not be entirely indefensible, but constructing a winning defence whilst on a level legal-expense playing field with their opponent, and without lying or obfuscating the full facts and moral implications of the case should, in a perfect world anyway, be pretty damn hard.
* or heated grips (which involved DIY wiring-in of a whole new relay-switched electrical subcircuit), or a better headlight, or handlebar wind-deflectors, or a screen, or a 12v outlet for my phone/satnav, the satnav itself (without going to a dealer), a non-OEM luggage box, or, or, or...
** the only thing they play successfully in is my (super cheap chinese size-of-a-70s-hifi) DVD player, and then only about 20 minutes at a time because as the laser unit heats up, its own thermal background noise level gradually pitches the whole affair from the region of "just about determining 1 from 0 successfully, and the error-correction picking up the slack" into "outputting something indistinguishable from white noise then failing completely"). I have to turn it on at the mains, cue it up to the start of the last wholly successful track, and then unplug it from the wall to cool down for an hour once failure kicks in. A computer drive has no hope. I'd have happily used my (SONY!!) Hi-MD in PCM mode, instead of borrowing this £300 device from work, but for the aforementioned problems.