Carrots_macduff said:
it depresses me when people are happy to see a kid go to jail, no matter what they did.
not saying he doesnt deserve it, but if you must send a 19 year old to prison, it should be done reluctantly, not with a smile on your face. plus, if you think its going to make him a better person, youre probably wrong.
To be honest with the way kids and young adults behave nowadays I find myself with increasingly little sympathy. If you do an adult sized crime, you deserve adult sized crime. Especially when the motive is malicious and tied to things like deliberate intimidation.
See, a bit of shoplifting (stealth, not mugging), some vandalism, maybe pulling a fire alarm, that's all stuff I think you can go easy with kids on and scare them straight. I mean I don't think some kid deserves 5 years if he eggs a house on Halloween and is too slow running away for example. On the other hand when your dealing with someone who falsely deploys a SWAT team, directly risking lives, and engages in identity theft and electronic intimidation... that's an entirely different case. As are cases like those girls who tried to kill another girl to appease Slender Man, sure it's a fictional character, and yes I think more time needed to be involved in finding who convinced them of this, but at the end of the day while a fictional character they still made a conscious effort to murder someone in the name of a malevolent supernatural entity. Sure, maybe some elements of this were childish, but it was still a conscious, pre-meditated, act of pure evil. Ask yourself what they wanted to do if they actually DID make friends with Slendy... I mean seriously, I might have actually tried to get them on planning mass murder, sure it would never work, but the intent was there, sort of like someone who thinks he builds a nuke (and fails) and tries to set it off, he was never really a threat, but that doesn't mean he wasn't trying to kill a crazy amount of people.
What's more at 19 this isn't a kid... and frankly I think five years is too little given the number of crimes, the motive should be a major aggravating factor as well. If this was all over something as petty as video games he represents a threat to society on a major level since who knows what he would do with a real motive. See, if your motivated by a lot of money, love, position, or similar things that's at least understandable, a person gave into temptation of a sort that would affect a lot of people. It's still wrong, but it's not like people run into those kinds of opportunities (real ones) every day, and I can see how someone can have that part of a moral compass repaired. On the other hand when your going after people for video games on their own (not money that just happens to be connect to them) I can't see the person ever having had a moral compass to be repaired. There is a big difference between getting mad, and maybe even wanting some kind of extreme revenge over something like a game, and actually premeditating and putting such a plan into motion electronically. Most people calm down. While it doesn't apply to cases like this, that's why "heat of the moment" is a defense in a lot of other crimes, or more appropriately a mitigating factor, not an actual defense.