As much as I agree with the possible sentencing, your reasoning is unjust. Over punishing someone to "make an example of them" is by definition unfair to the perpetrator. Using this man as a proxy to punish all "swatters" goes against the very nature of justice, you are punishing him for crimes you admit he did not do.Scow2 said:The reason he has to get hit so hard is because the crime is so difficult to find and prosecute - they have to come down hard on him to scare those they have little hope of catching straight. This isn't about stopping him from committing crimes - it's about dissuading others from following him.Barbas said:I know, and I agree that he should face punishment for what he did. He was selfish and stupid and if he didn't end up causing someone's death then he's been damn lucky. Better if he hadn't done the crime, obviously, but the idea of a 19 year old going to prison is still a sad one to me. I suppose the issue to me isn't the punishment itself but the prison system.J Tyran said:(Snip).
Except he DID commit the crime - if he hadn't, he wouldn't be one to make an example of. And, there are no mitigating factors to this crime - he hurt at least one innocent person (Is it fair to them that they had to suffer a SWAT raid?), and there is no 'necessity' behind this crime, or 'passion' motivating it.Darkmantle said:As much as I agree with the possible sentencing, your reasoning is unjust. Over punishing someone to "make an example of them" is by definition unfair to the perpetrator. Using this man as a proxy to punish all "swatters" goes against the very nature of justice, you are punishing him for crimes you admit he did not do.Scow2 said:The reason he has to get hit so hard is because the crime is so difficult to find and prosecute - they have to come down hard on him to scare those they have little hope of catching straight. This isn't about stopping him from committing crimes - it's about dissuading others from following him.Barbas said:I know, and I agree that he should face punishment for what he did. He was selfish and stupid and if he didn't end up causing someone's death then he's been damn lucky. Better if he hadn't done the crime, obviously, but the idea of a 19 year old going to prison is still a sad one to me. I suppose the issue to me isn't the punishment itself but the prison system.J Tyran said:(Snip).
Yes, he committed the crime, but he did not commit all the crimes. You are punishing him for the crimes others have committed by "making an example of him", which is unjust.Scow2 said:Except he DID commit the crime - if he hadn't, he wouldn't be one to make an example of. And, there are no mitigating factors to this crime - he hurt at least one innocent person (Is it fair to them that they had to suffer a SWAT raid?), and there is no 'necessity' behind this crime, or 'passion' motivating it.Darkmantle said:As much as I agree with the possible sentencing, your reasoning is unjust. Over punishing someone to "make an example of them" is by definition unfair to the perpetrator. Using this man as a proxy to punish all "swatters" goes against the very nature of justice, you are punishing him for crimes you admit he did not do.Scow2 said:The reason he has to get hit so hard is because the crime is so difficult to find and prosecute - they have to come down hard on him to scare those they have little hope of catching straight. This isn't about stopping him from committing crimes - it's about dissuading others from following him.Barbas said:I know, and I agree that he should face punishment for what he did. He was selfish and stupid and if he didn't end up causing someone's death then he's been damn lucky. Better if he hadn't done the crime, obviously, but the idea of a 19 year old going to prison is still a sad one to me. I suppose the issue to me isn't the punishment itself but the prison system.J Tyran said:(Snip).
He doesn't need to commit all the crimes. The punishment for the crime he did commit needs to be serious enough to dissuade others from following him. And, because it is a purely spite-driven crime, there's no excuse for leniency/inevitability.Darkmantle said:Yes, he committed the crime, but he did not commit all the crimes. You are punishing him for the crimes others have committed by "making an example of him", which is unjust.Scow2 said:Except he DID commit the crime - if he hadn't, he wouldn't be one to make an example of. And, there are no mitigating factors to this crime - he hurt at least one innocent person (Is it fair to them that they had to suffer a SWAT raid?), and there is no 'necessity' behind this crime, or 'passion' motivating it.Darkmantle said:As much as I agree with the possible sentencing, your reasoning is unjust. Over punishing someone to "make an example of them" is by definition unfair to the perpetrator. Using this man as a proxy to punish all "swatters" goes against the very nature of justice, you are punishing him for crimes you admit he did not do.Scow2 said:The reason he has to get hit so hard is because the crime is so difficult to find and prosecute - they have to come down hard on him to scare those they have little hope of catching straight. This isn't about stopping him from committing crimes - it's about dissuading others from following him.Barbas said:I know, and I agree that he should face punishment for what he did. He was selfish and stupid and if he didn't end up causing someone's death then he's been damn lucky. Better if he hadn't done the crime, obviously, but the idea of a 19 year old going to prison is still a sad one to me. I suppose the issue to me isn't the punishment itself but the prison system.J Tyran said:(Snip).
This light of a sentence though is making future people arrested for swatting think it's not that big of a deal. A harsher sentence nips that in the bud.Darkmantle said:Yes, he committed the crime, but he did not commit all the crimes. You are punishing him for the crimes others have committed by "making an example of him", which is unjust.Scow2 said:Except he DID commit the crime - if he hadn't, he wouldn't be one to make an example of. And, there are no mitigating factors to this crime - he hurt at least one innocent person (Is it fair to them that they had to suffer a SWAT raid?), and there is no 'necessity' behind this crime, or 'passion' motivating it.Darkmantle said:As much as I agree with the possible sentencing, your reasoning is unjust. Over punishing someone to "make an example of them" is by definition unfair to the perpetrator. Using this man as a proxy to punish all "swatters" goes against the very nature of justice, you are punishing him for crimes you admit he did not do.Scow2 said:The reason he has to get hit so hard is because the crime is so difficult to find and prosecute - they have to come down hard on him to scare those they have little hope of catching straight. This isn't about stopping him from committing crimes - it's about dissuading others from following him.Barbas said:I know, and I agree that he should face punishment for what he did. He was selfish and stupid and if he didn't end up causing someone's death then he's been damn lucky. Better if he hadn't done the crime, obviously, but the idea of a 19 year old going to prison is still a sad one to me. I suppose the issue to me isn't the punishment itself but the prison system.J Tyran said:(Snip).
How do you know for sure if this guy met steam was this same person?Adultism said:I actually met this guy on steam a couple months ago, called him out for being a dick and he DDOSed me. Guess he got what was coming to him heheh. Hope he gets max sentence such scum of society.
Could be a different person, very possible. Though it was the same username.Reincarnatedwolfgod said:This so call prank could gotten innocent people killed. I have no sympathy from this prick.
How do you know for sure if this guy met steam was this same person?Adultism said:I actually met this guy on steam a couple months ago, called him out for being a dick and he DDOSed me. Guess he got what was coming to him heheh. Hope he gets max sentence such scum of society.