The Big Picture: Continuity Wars

Recommended Videos

Scars Unseen

^ ^ v v < > < > B A
May 7, 2009
3,028
0
0
faefrost said:
Arslan Aladeen said:
Mario 1, he's tripping on some mushrooms. Mario 2, it's a dream. Mario 3, the game starts with a curtain rising. Conclusion, Mario makes a play based on all his trippy visions. Super Mario World, every area is named after a food, ergo Mario has the munchies.
Scars Unseen said:
Do I want the Sequel Trilogy to be an adaptation of EU stories? No, that's silly. I want a new story, not a rehash of one I could buy from Del Rey. On the other hand, I also believe it would be pretty bad to ride roughshod over the entire existence of the EU. Sure, it isn't all award winning literature, but there is some good stuff in there, and I would hate for the new trilogy to pretty much say that none of the characters in those stories exist at all.

Incidentally, the timing of these movies is eerily in sync with the current progression of the post-RotJ EU fiction. The Fate of the Jedi series ends up at about 40 years after the Emperor takes his swan dive into a reactor core(or whatever that was), and by the time Ep VII comes out it will have been about 32 years since RotJ hit theaters. If Ep VII took place a couple years after that storyline you would have a Skywalker just coming out his teens, a Solo on the Jedi Council, and another Solo preteen on whom the balance of the Force may turn. Not to mention the Empire has just had its first general election, there are at least two different sects of Sith out there somewhere, and the Galactic Alliance(formerly the New Republic) is reeling from a catastrophe on Coruscant.

I could think of several possible stories one could tell with that cast and setting.
They have to ride rough shod over pretty much the entirety of the post RotJ EU stories. It's pure math and accounting and aging. There is NO other option. It all gets thrown in the scrap heap.

Here is the problem

Fans of the Star Wars Movies = 2+ BILLION Human beings. These people are familiar with Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, Darth Vader, Chewbacca, etc etc etc.

Fans of secondary animated materials, ie The Clone Wars = 10+ Million. These are people (and young primary desired consumers) Who are well versed with the stories of Captain Rex, Asoka Tano, the 501st during the Clone Wars etc. Not a bad fan base as a starting point for anything new. Plus the entirety of this story takes place between movies 2 and 3, so does not require any knowlege past the third prequel. Solid still usable backstory and characters, to a point.

Now comes the 800lb Gorilla in the room that no one is talking about. Fans of the EU novels and printed stories. Somewhere in the neighborhood of 250,000 (at best, and even then only trending that high for the older stories like the Zahn stuff). (OK OK Maybe a bit more for the three Thrawn books only). At best estimate, maybe, just maybe some of these might peak close to a million. But the typical production run for the novels is 1 or 2 hundred thousand, if that. Heck Dark Horse would be thrilled to get anywhere near those numbers for the comics.

Now add to that the shear volume of material in those EU books that would occur in the 30 years between when we last saw our primary cast, and what the current age of your primary character actors now is. There is no possible way to compress any of that information to make it viable for use on screen. Certainly not without pissing off the 2 billion movie fans. Three words to illustrate the problem. "Death of Chewbacca". "Oh by the way fans, we callously killed off one of your favorite characters 10 years ago as a publicity stunt in a book that less than 1% of you even knew the existence of." And if you think that's bad, try explaining something like the stupidity that is the Yuuzhan Vong to your Uncle Louie who waited in line for 6 hours the summer of '77.

So when faced with the choice between pissing off maybe a hundred thousand fanatic nerds, or pissing off over a billion fans who wish not to be betrayed or confused, well Disney's gonna hold themselves a good old fashioned book burning. They simply cannot base any of the story around needed background knowledge and backstory that only 10's of thousands of fans actually know.

The best the EU fans can hope for is to maybe get some cameo's of some well liked characters. Much as they did in the Prequels. I would not rule out seeing or having some reference to Thrawn. I would not rule out some cameo of Coran Horn or Red Squadron. Mara Jade will not be seen. As much as a cool hot redhead would work well on screen, the whole "Married to Luke Skywalker and mother of his kids" thing pretty much stops that cold.
Other than Chewbacca's death(and even then that's a maybe), everything you just listed can more or less be ignored.

Ignored != invalidated.

The Vong thing is past. So is Thrawn and even Mara Jade. Assuming that the OT cast are not going to be the primary focus of the script(and if they are, you can count on the movies sucking as much as a modern Rolling Stones concert), the EU can remain as it stands without the movies even mentioning them, and everything would be fine. The only thing that would truly screw the EU pooch would be if the new trilogy focused on the Skywalker/Solo legacy and replaced Ben and Jaina as the characters.

As things stand in the EU, both the Galactic Alliance and the Empire are in a state of change if not outright chaos. The last big galaxy spanning story arc is over and done with, leaving things open for practically any sort of story. There are 2 potential groups of Bads that could be used, but the Fate of the Jedi story left things uncertain enough that both or neither of them could be relevant in the near future.

The slate is about as blank as one could ask for, short of Disney saying "Nope. Ben is a stupid name. Make new characters." It could not be easier to retain creative freedom without giving the big finger to the EU fans.
 

Not Matt

Senior Member
Nov 3, 2011
554
0
21
People assume that a story is a strict progression of cause to effect, but *actually* from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like aaaaaaaaaaaaa..............MULITIVERSES!!! YEAH! let's go with that.
one thing happened in one universe and another universe that is almost the some something entirely different happened.
 

InevitableFate

New member
May 10, 2009
80
0
0
Split thoughts.

I find that the post-film EU is a messy battleground of different narratives that don't make much sense. As MovieBob mentions a lot of it feels like fanfiction, though there are some gems lying around.

The pre-film EU, however, seems to be better, on average. Perhaps because they had to deal with entirely original concepts and characters, rather than using characters from the films and established scenarious.

In this new continuity I'd like to see references to the better parts of the old one, such as Admiral Thrawn and the Solo children, and I'd certainly like the older stuff to become more cemented in canon, but I could do without the endless parade of super-weapons, the Yuuzhan Vong and the myriad godlike force creatures that pop up occasionally.
 

Lvl 64 Klutz

Crowsplosion!
Apr 8, 2008
2,338
0
0
chickenhound said:
Lvl 64 Klutz said:
Haha, loved it. When you think about it, Super Mario Bros. continuity is a heck of a lot more interesting than Zelda continuity.
I will only agree ot that seeing as mario's is still debatable where as wiht LoZ we have the Hyrule Historia
Which has a timeline that contains the sentence "The resurrection of Ganon" WAAAYYY too many times.
 

Tumedus

New member
Jul 13, 2010
215
0
0
I certainly understand why they would want to avoid the EU stuff. However, I think overwriting it is the wrong approach.

Imo, they should have just jumped a few centuries to get past the bulk of the currently established lore. That does a few of things:

1) It preserves any current canon that fans may be attached to so they don't have to feel slighted when their favorite story gets invalidated.
2) Allows you to reference characters and events people care about without all the baggage of portraying them "incorrectly". People respond much better to the occassional easter egg than they do to messing up something they already have a clear personal view of.
3) Gives you new available elements of backstory to add depth to your tale. That's one of the reasons (granted, among many) that the original trilogy worked so much better: The characters, the factions, the entire galaxy, all had a history that shaped it. And by leaving it relatively vague, we had to fill the gaps with our own imaginations and, as a result, become more invested.
4) Makes the transition to a new vision much more palatable since fans can justify the changes as part of the tech evolution over time. This holds for any CGI and special effects enhancements as well (another thing the prequels did wrong).

Yeah, we probably shouldn't hold to continuity as much as we do, but we do. And, imo, with Lucas out of the way, there is really no reason to continue to shit on the fans love of that continuity.
 

Alfador_VII

New member
Nov 2, 2009
1,325
0
0
There has to be a Universe out there somewhere, in which Mario cosplays as Moviebob, not the other way round...
 

Fappy

\[T]/
Jan 4, 2010
12,010
0
41
Country
United States
The unfortunate thing about Super Mario continuity is that my favorite installment Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars would probably have to be in a parallel universe at this point :(
 

BehattedWanderer

Fell off the Alligator.
Jun 24, 2009
5,237
0
0
Is Mario continuity a thing?

Why have I never heard the arguments for it? Against it? Why does no one debate it? Can we start doing that? Zelda timeline arguments are fun enough, in that pedantic way that cataloging every minute detail of a large series can be, but the Mario games have enough breadth that we should be having a field day with this.

And ooh, Star Wars extended universe, I'm so enthralled and eager and hey, how about we talk about all this Mario Cannon?
 

ProtoChimp

New member
Feb 8, 2010
2,235
0
0
Hey Bob? I seem to remember you suggesting an early game overthinker video about Mario continuity. Perhaps now is the time, and now is the series.
 

demalo

New member
Aug 16, 2011
47
0
0
Alright, this is how you solve the continuity problem. You remember the last twilght movie right? The one with the big fight scene in the end where important characters died and it was nearly the end of the world, blah, blah... the one that the psychic vampire had a vision of?

That's Luke in the new movie. Now he's either seen the future (the entire EU book line) or experienced it through some sort of extreme force meditation and he sets out to keep that future from happening. It may be a turd of an idea, but it's the best looking turd in this septic system that I can find.
 

Neverhoodian

New member
Apr 2, 2008
3,831
0
0
At the risk of committing heresy, I believe Star Trek has the answer to Star Wars continuity:
Bam, there you go. Simply regard the EU material as an alternate reality, where different decisions led to different circumstances and outcomes than the films.
 

Andre Nilsson

New member
May 31, 2011
19
0
0
Do an episode on the Mario time line please. that was more interesting than the star wars things you said. but than again I am bigger fan of mario than of star wars
 

William Greeson

New member
Nov 13, 2012
7
0
0
Neverhoodian said:
At the risk of committing heresy, I believe Star Trek has the answer to Star Wars continuity:
Bam, there you go. Simply regard the EU material as an alternate reality, where different decisions led to different circumstances and outcomes than the films.
I, in fact, tend to do this with all KINDS of different fandoms.

It let me enjoy the new Star Trek movie as refreshing while not eventually pooping on them. Many people seem to think this over-writes the old canon, but it's simply telling you where it lies. This is a new reality, but the old one didn't happen, it happened in an alternate timeline that Spock never died in, he simply vanished into the Aether.(Which is soooo cool.:D)

It lets me enjoy things like M2 that Marvel ran with a while back. I loved Spider Girl, but she will never be canon.

I think you really have to pay attention to continuity when they ask us to, otherwise it's kind of an unneeded hassle.
Of course I'm also one of those weird guys who liked all the old dmc games and also really enjoyed the new one too.
 

Ashley Blalock

New member
Sep 25, 2011
287
0
0
Continuity can be fun when it's something like surprise Beast Wars ties into Transformers G1 continuity or when Batman Beyond would bring up something from Batman the Animated series.

But I'm just not a fan of being a slave to continuity. Personally I'd rather just forget the Star Wars prequel films ever happened. It's also nice to say the Transformers movies happen in some weird alternate reality so Decepticons can be cool in other realities. And occasionally it's fun to just bust continuity all to hell like when Battlestar Galactica said hey lets mess with expectations and make Starbuck a woman.
 

tzimize

New member
Mar 1, 2010
2,389
0
0
Wow Bob. You are the geekest.

My everlasting respect for that mario stuff. I honestly didnt even know it HAD a story besides that fucking princess getting repeatedly abducted. How about some self-defense lessons, eh?!
 

evilneko

Fall in line!
Jun 16, 2011
2,218
49
53
This brings to mind two words. Two very fearsome words.

Robocop reboot.

Bob must do an episode about it...or at least mention it in a junk drawer ep.