Another long post for the Bob fanboy in me.
Firstly, I agreed with some of that episode...does that make me a fanboy, or one of the twats who insists on moderation and moral relativism?
Secondly, ^. You have--yourself, Bob--externalized (externalized, not internalized) a supposition and accepted it as fact. You have supposed that there are two ends to every spectrum and that they must be in equal opposition, rather than have equal power. Not only have you fallen victim to argumentum verbosium, fallacy of misplaced concretion, and non sequitur, but you have done so in the exact format that you judge as being antiquated and useless.
The reality is, that sometimes things are equal, sometimes they are not. Sometimes they are equally opposed, sometimes they are not. Sometimes, they are inequitably opposed, and sometimes the peace of pastoral silence reigns. Sometimes, things have more than two points of view, or more than two final conclusions from whence to draw. You have painted a strange picture, and not one that lives up to reality.
I have never seen a troll or a troll feeder afraid to express any opinion...just look at your comments, and you can see the invalidity of stating that the vast majority of internet culture are hiding in a digital box, afraid to voice their own little views for fear of rejection by the masses they seemed to not care about several years ago; we're nerds in High School, but now that the internetz have provided us with anonymity, we suddenly care what jocks with half a brain cell think?
Most genuine fanboys take pride in their fanboyism; the purpose being, of course, to utterly castrate such ridiculous admonitions as imparting moral and intellectual values to a choice based on personal preference in virtual entertainment. Those who insist (and by insist I mean argue until Godwin's Law and Rule 34 have a baby) they are not fanboys are more likely than not trolls, whose opinions are more likely than not unfounded and uneducated...go look at internet forums---ANY OF THEM---and you will see this pattern.
You have again, Bob, forgone logic in your presentation. Logic dictates that there is the possibility of equality in every situation, and the possibility of equivocation in every situation. I personally take great pride in trying to see the other side's point; it only helps me disassemble the machinations of their grossly mislead imaginations more efficiently.
I'm not playing Devil's Advocate here, I really think you've been hitting way off the mark lately. You've railed against marriage, belief, the ability to have one's own opinion, the clothes that people wear...where is there safe harbor from your impotent wrath? I truly wish that you would read some of your comments, instead of post your vids and run as a poltroon would; you seem very much a Clyte these days. I would love to entertain an actual discussion with you, rather than simply post after your vitriole.
But then again, maybe you do read the comments. Maybe this vid is in response to all of the invectives you've received over these last weeks opposing your right to express yourself? It certainly would be a shame if such a tanglesome argument was supposed to be the foundation of your opinion...I could express an opinion daily that would suffer from fewer mundane errors in judgement, and I wouldn't even be getting paid!
Firstly, I agreed with some of that episode...does that make me a fanboy, or one of the twats who insists on moderation and moral relativism?
Secondly, ^. You have--yourself, Bob--externalized (externalized, not internalized) a supposition and accepted it as fact. You have supposed that there are two ends to every spectrum and that they must be in equal opposition, rather than have equal power. Not only have you fallen victim to argumentum verbosium, fallacy of misplaced concretion, and non sequitur, but you have done so in the exact format that you judge as being antiquated and useless.
The reality is, that sometimes things are equal, sometimes they are not. Sometimes they are equally opposed, sometimes they are not. Sometimes, they are inequitably opposed, and sometimes the peace of pastoral silence reigns. Sometimes, things have more than two points of view, or more than two final conclusions from whence to draw. You have painted a strange picture, and not one that lives up to reality.
I have never seen a troll or a troll feeder afraid to express any opinion...just look at your comments, and you can see the invalidity of stating that the vast majority of internet culture are hiding in a digital box, afraid to voice their own little views for fear of rejection by the masses they seemed to not care about several years ago; we're nerds in High School, but now that the internetz have provided us with anonymity, we suddenly care what jocks with half a brain cell think?
Most genuine fanboys take pride in their fanboyism; the purpose being, of course, to utterly castrate such ridiculous admonitions as imparting moral and intellectual values to a choice based on personal preference in virtual entertainment. Those who insist (and by insist I mean argue until Godwin's Law and Rule 34 have a baby) they are not fanboys are more likely than not trolls, whose opinions are more likely than not unfounded and uneducated...go look at internet forums---ANY OF THEM---and you will see this pattern.
You have again, Bob, forgone logic in your presentation. Logic dictates that there is the possibility of equality in every situation, and the possibility of equivocation in every situation. I personally take great pride in trying to see the other side's point; it only helps me disassemble the machinations of their grossly mislead imaginations more efficiently.
I'm not playing Devil's Advocate here, I really think you've been hitting way off the mark lately. You've railed against marriage, belief, the ability to have one's own opinion, the clothes that people wear...where is there safe harbor from your impotent wrath? I truly wish that you would read some of your comments, instead of post your vids and run as a poltroon would; you seem very much a Clyte these days. I would love to entertain an actual discussion with you, rather than simply post after your vitriole.
But then again, maybe you do read the comments. Maybe this vid is in response to all of the invectives you've received over these last weeks opposing your right to express yourself? It certainly would be a shame if such a tanglesome argument was supposed to be the foundation of your opinion...I could express an opinion daily that would suffer from fewer mundane errors in judgement, and I wouldn't even be getting paid!
