So, twice then?wammnebu said:Kudos to Sach, they really should, I now hate rift more than that damn SlimJim
cool review, and i still think Norman is a great character, and you cant pick on him for being Retconnd. Their commics Jean Grey has died and ressurected more times that Christ
<--See prof pic
Originally Marvel was going to have Mephisto be behind the whole clone deal, but they claimed it would be a massive copout and scrapped the idea. Now with Joe Quesada's fanfiction of One More Day, hindsight's a *****, eh? The only way they're going to fix that damage is if they retcon the thing (with possible involvement from Deadpool since he's the ONLY one in the Marvel universe who's aware of the whole thing)summerof2010 said:Ok... then where does Mephisto come in?
I used to buy the digests from a local comic shop back when I lived in Dublin, but since I moved from there I haven't really kept track of the releases.CrazyGirl17 said:I do want to read more Spider-Girl, though, but I'm not sure where to look. I was lucky enough to find a small collection book in a book store several years back, but haven't been able to find any others since...
That was Harry Osborn who had the drug problem, just so you know. ^^'cerebus23 said:I was into spiderman when i was a kid back in the 70s you know the dark and edgy years, norman osborne taking LSD and becoming the green goblin, which lost them the "comic code" seal i seem to recall.
They kept it going on due to popularity; seriously, when the comics implosion occurred Marvel's MARKETING DEPARTMENT had control over basically everything in the company due to the company declaring bankruptcyThe Great JT said:How do you screw something like that up? Spider-Clone (because I refuse to call him Scarlet Spider) comes back and is revealed to be the real Spider-Man, Spidey finds out MJ is pregnant, decides to retire and passes the Spider-Man title on to Spider-Clone, something happens that forces Spider-Clone to retire, Spidey comes and ultimately it's discovered Spider-Clone is actually the clone.
It sounds like you'd have to be completely brain-dead to screw that up. But oh boy, Marvel, when you goof it up, you really goof it up.
my bad, has been about 30 years since i read it lol. still those books were good and strong enough to remain in my mind over the years. we many other books from back then and earlier i could scarsely recall any details.JediMB said:That was Harry Osborn who had the drug problem, just so you know. ^^'cerebus23 said:I was into spiderman when i was a kid back in the 70s you know the dark and edgy years, norman osborne taking LSD and becoming the green goblin, which lost them the "comic code" seal i seem to recall.
And the 80's were really when the comic started getting darker and edgier. Stories like "Kraven's Last Hunt" come to mind. That said, it was pretty badass of Marvel to have the courage to make Harry an addict.
The 80's and 70's had their fair share of shit as well. People rattle on about Bieber but forget Stock/Aiken/Waterman, The Monkees, and all the other manufactured bands.roostuf said:Man the ninties you keep on painting really looks shit.