D_987 said:
Shjade said:
Amusingly enough, when I look at how much people are complaining about this one remark - one that isn't even wrong, they just don't like how it's structured
Way to just make a controversial statement without any kind of reasoning or explanation behind it to back it up...If you make a remark like that, and I think based on his previous works it pretty clear Bob's attempting to troll people, expect to get called out on it.
Do explain, just why is that comment "not wrong".
Bob's statement, paraphrased: most western games have lackluster story.
The argument people have presented: most games in general have lackluster story, western games are no worse than non-western.
That argument does not conflict with Bob's statement. Most western games have lackluster story even if most non-western games also have lackluster story.
The statement isn't wrong, you just don't like how it's phrased because it implies some other origin of games is better. Whether or not that's true is irrelevant to the majority of western games having weak (I wanted to keep repeating lackluster through the whole post to see if I could do it; I couldn't) stories.
To put it another way, if I say that gun control in Madeuplandia is terrible, you pointing out that gun control in Also Fictitioussia is just as bad does not make my statement wrong. If they're both equally terrible, then they are individually terrible as well.
Did that clear it up for you? I could try being more detailed if you need it, but it's not a complicated position.