Firstly, I <3 Thrall.The Madman said:So the instant the Alliance has a leader which dares to stand up to the Horde, he's a douche? Pah! The Horde have had this coming for a long, long time. It's not just the Wrath Gate incident, where the Horde's idiocy cost the Alliance one of its greatest hero, but plenty of other things as well. Orcs invading Ashenvale and Forsaken invading Hillsbrad for example.WaaghPowa said:true that, I hate the alliance purely for lore reasons especially Wrynn. Thrall has got to be one of the most reasonable leaders in the story, he's worked so hard to get both factions work together for the common good. When the betrayal of Varimathras and the Forsaken occured at the wrath gate, rather than act rationally, Wrynn declared war on the horde because his friend Fordragon died. He was willing to risk total annihilation at the hands of Arthas just for his own petty revenge.
Then when you also consider Varians father, his mentor, his homeland and his people were all killed by Orcs in Warcraft 1-2, and now his best friend has just been killed by the Horde... Yeah, he's got more than enough reason to be distrustful.
Secondly, Wrynn has many, many reasons to hate and not trust the horde. A good deal of them don't share the same outlook as Thrall/Cairne. Not to mention all of the reasons that The Madman gave. The First and Second Wars are more than enough for Wrynn to feel that way.
Thirdly, Bolvar Fordragon isn't dead as much as he is the new Lich King.
Fourthly, players get the omnipresent view of what happens in Warcraft, but the lore figures don't. The alliance and horde aren't exactly on speaking terms, so it wouldn't make sense for Wrynn to believe the same people who killed his father and destroyed his kingdom about the betrayal at the wrathgate. Saurfang the Younger and Fordragon had formed a special combined force that didn't extend beyond northrend.