Spirultima said:
Look at the guy at the back, shin guards and a cup fair enough, and the "hard ball" your talking about, its far more cushioned then a cricket ball, and cricket balls hurt... a lot, damn aussies...
Looking at stuff on Wikipedia and YouTube... the "catcher" in Cricket stands behind the wickets, right? So he'll only be touching the ball after it's had some of its speed clipped by those little sticks... also, it's supposed to bounce before you hit it, right? That takes off a ton of speed, too.
Come to think of it, how fast does a cricket pitch go, anyway? (on average) It doesn't seem to me like it's going quite as fast as baseball pitches do - probably because the field looks shorter, so it's more important to keep it under control. Trust me - if you're on the other end of a ball going 100+ mph (160+ kph) wearing a mask and glove like that just makes sense. You'd want to do it too.
Yeah, some are faster then the people who go into a tackle, also, why wear any? People who are comfortable with there skill don't need to wear any protection, put your body on the line, your most likely going to play better.
I'm sorry, that's absurd. "People who are comfortable with their skill don't need to wear any protection?" Have you seen how many injuries there are in football
already? Look at the original news post! "Putting your body on the line" is just going to mean that most professional football players will have a year or two of playtime, tops. It may not be your choice of game, but to say that football players aren't skilled is kind of silly. In fact, that's the problem - the other team is
very skilled in trying to take you down, so protection is necessary.
No, no, no. Main rule in Rugby, no passing forwards, always have to pass sidewards on or backwards, and american football requires more tactics? they might be similar in gameplay, but the base rules are more difficult in rugby
I don't see how
removing options makes a game more tactical. In football, you can do lateral or reverse passes; they're all part of the game. In Rugby, since you know the ball has to move forward on foot, you know how to defend - there won't be any devastating surprises. In football, you have to cover all your bases: You need a good backfield to defend against the pass, but if you put too much in the backfield than they can just steamroll your line. Run plays are good for gaining one or two yards at a time, and are more reliable, whereas passes tend to get you larger yardage but are less reliable and more dangerous (since they carry the risk of interception).
Like here, I'll give you a scenario: It's second down - the first play was a run play, and gained three yards, so it's second and seven.
Er, I just realized I don't know how much you know about football, so I'll give a quick overview to be on the safe side: A team has four "downs," which essentially means they have four tries to advance ten yards. If they successfully advance, they get another set of four downs - but if they don't make it, then the other team gets the ball. This is why most teams will punt the ball on the fourth down, so that the other team starts with the ball from way back.
Anyway, right. It's 2nd down with seven yards to go. The offense lines up with the quarterback a ways back from the line of scrimmage, which indicates it'll be a pass play. The defense, ergo, has to drop back to make sure it can cover all the potential receivers. But they can't drop
too far back, because the whole appearance of a pass play could be a trick - instead of passing, the QB could hand off to one of the running backs who could take advantage of a weakened defensive line to gain another few yards, which would put them in an excellent position on 3rd down.
But the offense knows this, and when the snap comes, the QB needs to be incredibly strategic. Are there passers open? Is the coverage too thick?
It's incredibly tactical play-by-play, but the players need to think on their feet, too. Adding the forward pass as an option means that there's huge potential for mindgames.