The New Shiny Escapist

Recommended Videos

iRevanchist

New member
Jun 11, 2011
141
0
0
new layout makes the borders look completely empty, while the tops and bottoms are busting at the seems with too-small text. I liked the old version a lot more.
tangoprime said:
It looks like facebook now. Like... the current facebook. The bad one. With boxes and feeds everywhere, and everything way too spread out and inefficient.

Before it was compact, streamlined, efficient, and warm. Now, its facebook.
agreed. the old version had a 'warmer' feel, as you say. plus the new font makes the text on the ZP page jump partially onto the thumbnail.

in short: appreciate the effort, but it's pretty bad.
 

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
Hate this, looks more busy and overly complicated. When did streamlined get confused with style over content? Now it looks like it was changed for the sake of it to be like Facebook etc where as the old style was perfect, easier to move around on and find what you want. Change it back.
 

JasonEllis66

New member
Oct 23, 2008
34
0
0
After using it some more I have noticed a huge lag on going to new pages that most times will require me to reload the tab several times. I do not have the time or patience to wait 1 to 2 minutes to load a page, if this is not fixed quickly I will need to find a new gaming news website, any suggestions on a good one?
 

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
General Vengeance said:
First Youtube now the Escapist, seriously why do people mess with things that work? Do people need to justify their jobs or something?

I don't see the Sun or water doing anything new. The sun is still hot and water is still wet, if there is DEMAND for change then you change until then no touchy. You go now and wear many ribbons of shame.
This. The previous site was perfect. Easy to navigate and you could get to where you want quickly. Now its messy with lots of boxes all over the place. Yes we can all get used to it and learn how to navigate through the mess. But the problem is the previous version was superior to this. Why fix what isnt broken?
 

cidbahamut

New member
Mar 1, 2010
235
0
0
This web 2.0 crap is not a good thing. The site is slow as balls now and the layout just makes me want to scream "where the hell did everything go?"

This is a most unwelcome change.
 

ultrapowerpie

New member
Feb 22, 2011
29
0
0
I for one really hate it to be honest. I liked the olderone because it wasn't so bloody blinding. The whitespace looks absolutely dreadful. Like you guys can't be bothered to impliment a background (which I know isn't true).

Probably just coming for ZP now that y'all changed it to this.
 

Trujkin

New member
Nov 12, 2002
162
0
0
mjc0961 said:
Just about everyone in Pub Club complained about how disgustingly bright this white background is. Comments were made that it would be toned down. And now here it is, in my face again, blinding me. Thanks for looking into that issue like you told us you would. *thumbs up*

At least I can do this *clicks Pub Club exclusive "Old Site" link*.

EDIT: Oh nice. The "Old Site" link is broken. So let me just say thanks again for asking us all for our feedback and swiftly ignoring it all to launch the site despite the near universal complaints about the background and the numerous complaints about the front page layout. Next time this site asks for feedback, I'll be the one doing the ignoring.
We have made several changes based directly on feedback from pub club. Go back and read the thread.
 

Trujkin

New member
Nov 12, 2002
162
0
0
Vanguard_Ex said:
I wouldn't go as far as to say I hate it, yeah it's unusual and seems a little unpolished in some ways but I'm sure I'll grow to like it.

Also if the moderators could stop warning people for their opinions that would be great. I mean:
mgirl said:
I have 2 problems with it:

1 - the loading times are a lot longer since the update, but I imagine that will get smoothed out soon enough.

2- it's too goddamn bright. It may have something to do with the fact I have adblocker on firefox, but the entire background is bright white. Seriously, I can't look at this website for more than a couple of minutes before my eyes start to hurt.

Other than that, I have no issue with it. But please, PLEASE make it less 'makes your eyes bleed' bright.
A warning for this? I mean I know you're infamous for abusing your powers but come on guys...
Advocating ad block has always been against our Code of Conduct.
 

mental_looney

New member
Apr 29, 2008
522
0
0
Change is scary and different and confusing! But yeah too many boxes it's nice and all but it's slow and takes aaaaages to load.
 

slimeonline

is wondering how long this can b
Mar 22, 2010
112
0
0
Bug: giant pictures at the bottom of the screen sometimes not even from the page (firefox)

sorry if someone already said it
 

A Curious Fellow

New member
Nov 16, 2010
284
0
0
Everything on site takes an epoch to load, and I have never had such trouble from the Escapist. This site needs to be repaired, as it is broken.
 

Meggiepants

Not a pigeon roost
Jan 19, 2010
2,536
0
0
Okay, I like how the videos are much easier to find from the from the main page navigation bar. But I loathe the fact that only one video is now featured on the top of the main page. When you have more than one video that debuts each day of the week, it's a serious pain in the ass not to be able to see the new video easily on the main page. I had to hunt all over for MoS. It just isn't very noticeable in all that clutter. In fact, the only noticeable thing is the big showcase box on the left. Everything else just blends together.

Nav bar is much improved though.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,628
0
0
The new layout is really not that great for showing new video content. It only allows ONE video to be shown on the front page, compared to the old layout which allowed three to be featured at once. So on days where there are multiple videos, like today, only Zero Punctuation gets featured. Feed Dump and Miracle of Sound are nowhere to be seen, and it took 40 minutes before someone commented on Feed Dump, and about an hour before someone commented on Miracle of Sound.

Though now Miracle of Sound finally has a spot on the front page, after an hour or so, Feed Dump is still nowhere to be seen.
 

Dana22

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,274
0
0
Im scared and confused, I dont like changes.

Its Kotaku all over again, and I dont browse Kotaku anymore.
 

mrscott137

New member
Apr 8, 2010
135
0
0
Everything seems to be loading slower, but that's probably just the opening day thing.
Aside from that, I shall get used to the new UI.
 

Misterian

Elite Member
Oct 3, 2009
1,827
1
43
Country
United States
tangoprime said:
It looks like facebook now. Like... the current facebook. The bad one. With boxes and feeds everywhere, and everything way too spread out and inefficient.

Before it was compact, streamlined, efficient, and warm. Now, its facebook.
Sort of what I was thinking, but then, I don't go to Facebook very much.

I hope they at least do what Wikipedia did and give out an option to use the older version.
 

N3Burgener

Regular Member
Feb 10, 2010
43
0
11
My main complaints with the new site are as follows:

1) I miss having descriptive text under the featured articles on the main page. Just a quick blurb to clue me in to what the article's about and entice me to click on it. Now all I've got are a bunch of seemingly random headlines.

2) I don't like how everything just kind of "floats" on the white background. There are hardly any borders anywhere, and it makes it feel like nothing's really anchored to the site, like it's just a bunch of transient things wandering around the site, doesn't feel like anything belongs.

I realize the intention was to add more "air" to the site, to make the front page seem less cluttered, but I think it kind of backfired. Yes, there's less stuff all over the front page, but now there's quite simply NO CONTEXT for anything. It makes all of the featured content feel random and fleeting, and now that there's less information on the front page, everything actually feels more cluttered.