The R Word

ZippyDSMlee

New member
Sep 1, 2007
3,959
0
0
Muspelheim said:
Helmholtz Watson said:
Telling me how I have to behave on Xbox live because you don't like it and it goes against your ideas, is an agenda that I don't have to agree with or abide by.
It isn't my ideas. It's what responsible, considerate adults are supposed to do; consider what words they let leave their mouths. Civility. I guarantee you, your world or your gaming experience will be in no way diminished because you consider what you say and what it may do to other players.

No, I can't really tell you how to behave on Xbox live. However, you will be judged by your behaviour, like everywhere else.

EDIT: I'm genuinly curious now. What exactly is it that you lose if you choose to not use certain words carelessly? There must be other, better ones, and you don't run the risk of being hurtful to some other person.
*lurk lurk lurk* Ok I bite...... how many traumatizing trigger words are going to have to be removed from common use before humanity realizes that was never the problem to begin with.

This stuff(I go beyond rape to anything else that might cause a break down or hurt feelings) is situational and dependent upon the individual traumatized, IE there are to many random factors for humans to up and change to say other wise is rather disingenuous....
 

chadachada123

New member
Jan 17, 2011
2,310
0
0
That was an amazing article. I gained a lot of insight, and never really knew about the 'limp' analogy.

Bravo.

As an aside, though, I'm truly curious about how this relates to torture. Why is sexual assault seen as so much worse than true torture, which can have the exact same results yet is present in great amounts in many triple-A games?

Why is torture seen as a 'challenge to overcome' while rape (correctly) is not?

Take a look at this, and you'll see what I mean:


Christopher Hitchens had panic attacks lasting the rest of his life from thirty seconds of water-boarding, so just imagine the life-lasting effects that days or weeks of true torture would have. I assure you, it would be very much similar to a rape victim's suffering.

So while I may not stop my colloquial usage of rape immediately, I will definitely try to lower my use of it, though I wish that people would make the same connection with torture as is made with rape, and have yet to see a reason to distinguish between the two.

Both DO have their use in story-telling, and both are horrible events that can ruin or damage a person irreparably.
 

easternflame

Cosmic Rays of Undeadly Fire
Nov 2, 2010
745
0
0
Fluoxetine said:
anthony87 said:
Fluoxetine said:
A terrible article with dangerous ramifications, and I demand an opportunity to provide a counterpoint even though I know I will not be allowed one.
....provide it here maybe?
I'm on probation already and every time I provide an opinion contrary to the popular one I get reported.
Perhaps it is how you express your opinion... I mean, TERRIBLE article with no objective explanation and then saying it's our fault because we have a different opinion. Huh.
Maybe you should listen to the latest escapist podcast.
 

littlewisp

New member
Mar 25, 2010
273
0
0
ZippyDSMlee said:
*lurk lurk lurk* Ok I bite...... how many traumatizing trigger words are going to have to be removed from common use before humanity realizes that was never the problem to begin with.

This stuff(I go beyond rape to anything else that might cause a break down or hurt feelings) is situational and dependent upon the individual traumatized, IE there are to many random factors for humans to up and change to say other wise is rather disingenuous....
ARGH. What gets me about these arguments is that it totally ignores a few things.

First of all, the main thing is: should we even care about hurting others in a significant way?

If the answer is yes, then you have a responsibility to limit you usage of words to ones you, to the best of your knowledge, think will not cause hurt to others. Or, if you're unwilling to do that, to thoroughly and sincerely apologize to anyone who is brave enough to come up to you and tell you that you caused them pain. But the point is, if you do truly care about hurting others and causing that pain, then you would do your best to not use words that you think are offensive or might be to one of the strangers out there (no, I'm not saying cut out every single word in your vocabulary, but the chances of someone being hurt by 'fag' are a lot higher than someone being hurt by 'blue.' We're intelligent creatures. We can understand the difference between what is typically hurtful versus what is not). Will you still probably offend someone sometime? Yeah. And, if it is something you deem to be probably offensive or hurtful, you'd apologize. (someone getting hurt because they've dealt with mental afflictions all their life and you're making fun of that is different from someone getting hurt because you insulted their favorite actress)

If the answer is no then there is absolutely no point in even debating word usage because the basic thing that would make a discussion worth having is not there.
 

Muspelheim

New member
Apr 7, 2011
2,023
0
0
ZippyDSMlee said:
*lurk lurk lurk* Ok I bite...... how many traumatizing trigger words are going to have to be removed from common use before humanity realizes that was never the problem to begin with.

This stuff(I go beyond rape to anything else that might cause a break down or hurt feelings) is situational and dependent upon the individual traumatized, IE there are to many random factors for humans to up and change to say other wise is rather disingenuous....
Well, first of all... Do we really, really need words like rape, fag, ****** and so on to make an internet discussion worth having? Sure, they're terms and words, too, but... They're sensitive for a reason.

I do see your point, however. Many different words can be that one trigger that catalysts such a reaction. Sometimes, you simply couldn't possibly know, if it's a completly regular word, like attic. However, some words are more commonly a catalyst than others, and a carelessly tossed "rape" is one of those who are fairly likely to be that.
Again, I don't think it should be entirely removed from our vocabulary. The word itself aren't very likely to cause a flashback or anxiety. It's about the context.

Like if a player say "Ha! I raped you, noob!" after beating them at some moment in a game. It's when rape is used in that manner that it becomes a problem, like a very careless term of domination. It's -that- behaviour that just isn't very kind, and it's not a difficult task to simply choose a less loaded term.

Edit:
chadachada123 said:
As an aside, though, I'm truly curious about how this relates to torture. Why is sexual assault seen as so much worse than true torture, which can have the exact same results yet is present in great amounts in many triple-A games?

Why is torture seen as a 'challenge to overcome' while rape (correctly) is not?
That -is- a very good point, actually, and I'd really wish developers would stop doing that, amongst other things... It just doesn't feel right. I feel that it's one thing shooting an enemy entity that has a fair chance to fight back, and another thing to do horrible things to them when they're restrained and can't defend themselves. It just makes me want to quit, or skip that section.
 

Doneeee

New member
Dec 27, 2011
359
0
0
The absolute stubbornness of some of these self proclaimed white knights is crazy. I think they're just thriving on the internet attention. Anyways this article was great and there is nothing to say that anyone else hasn't already stated. Great writing anonymous.
 

ZippyDSMlee

New member
Sep 1, 2007
3,959
0
0
littlewisp said:
ZippyDSMlee said:
*lurk lurk lurk* Ok I bite...... how many traumatizing trigger words are going to have to be removed from common use before humanity realizes that was never the problem to begin with.

This stuff(I go beyond rape to anything else that might cause a break down or hurt feelings) is situational and dependent upon the individual traumatized, IE there are to many random factors for humans to up and change to say other wise is rather disingenuous....
ARGH. What gets me about these arguments is that it totally ignores a few things.

First of all, the main thing is: should we even care about hurting others in a significant way?

If the answer is yes, then you have a responsibility to limit you usage of words to ones you, to the best of your knowledge, think will not cause hurt to others. Or, if you're unwilling to do that, to thoroughly and sincerely apologize to anyone who is brave enough to come up to you and tell you that you caused them pain. But the point is, if you do truly care about hurting others and causing that pain, then you would do your best to not use words that you think are offensive or might be to one of the strangers out there (no, I'm not saying cut out every single word in your vocabulary, but the chances of someone being hurt by 'fag' are a lot higher than someone being hurt by 'blue.' We're intelligent creatures. We can understand the difference between what is typically hurtful versus what is not). Will you still probably offend someone sometime? Yeah. And, if it is something you deem to be probably offensive or hurtful, you'd apologize. (someone getting hurt because they've dealt with mental afflictions all their life and you're making fun of that is different from someone getting hurt because you insulted their favorite actress)

If the answer is no then there is absolutely no point in even debating word usage because the basic thing that would make a discussion worth having is not there.
We should be reasonable to each other and not play on each others weaknesses.

And I hate arguments such as your. It effects so few and its so hard to effect effective change its just silly to think such good ideas will ever work.

It goes back again to situational scenarios everyone deals with different ones differently, the most you can hope for is for humans to be respectful of others.

This means that poor use of word meanings would hopefully be lessened around people you do not know or in public.

oh....damnit I think I just argued your point.........damnit why do I have to be a long winded bastard ><
 

Andy Shandy

Fucked if I know
Jun 7, 2010
4,797
0
0
Well this is a tricky one...

First of all, Mr Anonymous, I thank you for writing the article when it has clearly been difficult for you. And I would like to fully agree with you in trying to avoid "trigger words" as they can cause traumatic flashbacks to victims.

However the reason I cannot fully agree is due to the fear, however foolish/irrational it may admittedly seem, is that there are that many potential triggers words (not all obviously to the level of rape) that it is nigh on impossible to predict what a trigger word for somebody may be, and that this may lead to a slippery slope of nobody talking at all for fear of offending someone. Let's move on however as I myself have admitted that the thought of that scenario is rather foolish.

Anyway, your article has definitely moved me, and I will definitely make an attempt to make sure I, and others, at least think, or 'check our surroundings' at least before using obviously potential trigger words.

...and group hug, everyone.

 

ZippyDSMlee

New member
Sep 1, 2007
3,959
0
0
Muspelheim said:
ZippyDSMlee said:
*lurk lurk lurk* Ok I bite...... how many traumatizing trigger words are going to have to be removed from common use before humanity realizes that was never the problem to begin with.

This stuff(I go beyond rape to anything else that might cause a break down or hurt feelings) is situational and dependent upon the individual traumatized, IE there are to many random factors for humans to up and change to say other wise is rather disingenuous....
Well, first of all... Do we really, really need words like rape, fag, ****** and so on to make an internet discussion worth having? Sure, they're terms and words, too, but... They're sensitive for a reason.

I do see your point, however. Many different words can be that one trigger that catalysts such a reaction. Sometimes, you simply couldn't possibly know, if it's a completly regular word, like attic. However, some words are more commonly a catalyst than others, and a carelessly tossed "rape" is one of those who are fairly likely to be that.
Again, I don't think it should be entirely removed from our vocabulary. The word itself aren't very likely to cause a flashback or anxiety. It's about the context.

Like if a player say "Ha! I raped you, noob!" after beating them at some moment in a game. It's when rape is used in that manner that it becomes a problem, like a very careless term of domination. It's -that- behaviour that just isn't very kind, and it's not a difficult task to simply choose a less loaded term.
What I am getting at is that humanity is incapable of doing anything different as we as a people are as mature as our most immature.

And while "we" revel in the usage of bad/sick/sad slang words there will always be other words to replace them in the common vernacular, at least until we no longer have no need for uncouth slang words.
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,503
0
0
Mike Kayatta said:
It's not a fallacious appeal to emotion. It's an extremely simple point. Why do you need to use this word? What do you actually gain in comparison to what he and similar people actually lose? Period.
What you said before was an appeal to emotion. However now that you have asked a question that doesn't appeal to emotion, I'll answer it. I suppose I gain the ability to freely express myself regardless of how other people might feel about it.

CaptainKarma said:
Typical &#8800; never used. Learn to read what I've written in response to you or don't bother making a response at all.
You don't like it? Don't respond.

CaptainKarma said:
And okay, here we go, if you want to look at why you shouldn't make rape jokes to strangers without using emotions it's very simple. It can trigger them. Triggers can make people stop processing things well and they won't make logical decisions. Triggers can make people so unproductive that they can do none of the tasks that their society needs them to complete. Triggers can also make some people violent and physically harm other people in society.
Then those people should remove themselves from situations where they can harm people. Also, it isn't my job to make sure that I don't offend people on the internet because they might be triggered by anything I say.
CaptainKarma said:
I would argue though that as this is a discussion about people using the word rape in an emotional way to begin with, a joke which is inherently about emotions (it's about making you feel elated after all if a joke's "good") is what we're discussing. We're discussing the way people use rape in a kind of joking or victorious way in games. The victorious expression is also about emotion as it's expressing a feeling of triumph.

There is no way this argument isn't about emotion. If your argument is that emotions shouldn't come in to play here that won't make sense since jokes and victory expression are inherently emotional things and taking away emotion from this does no one any good. It defeats the purpose of these things entirely.

Prove to me how a joke isn't about emotion (which includes relieving stress, an emotion, and bringing happiness, an emotion) or how a victory cry isn't filled with emotion and we can argue about how neither of them should be treated emotionally.
I don't have to prove anything. However if your going to make an argument that you want me to consider, you are going to have to avoid logic fallacies like appealing to emotion.

CaptainKarma said:
Also, an emotional fallacy is a fallacy wherein I'd appeal to your emotions. I didn't. I gave you information on how most other people feel, based on statistics that I remember and personal experience, that doesn't automatically mean I'm appealing to your emotions. I'm not trying to make you cry. I'm not trying to make you feel bad. I'm just telling you how some people have felt. Don't use emotional fallacy when you don't know what it means.
You seem to be attempting to make me feel sorry for people and that pitty should be a reason why I shouldn't say the word rape. That is an appeal to emotion. Otherwise why tell me what other people think? Why should I do something just because other people are doing it?

CaptainKarma said:
Furthermore, if we're going to argue about emotions here, why do you want to use the word rape? Does it make you feel good? Do you like that word? What reason is there for you to use it other than an emotional attachment to it? It's just a word after all, and it doesn't even accurately describe what you're doing when you win a game against someone, so why use it?
I didn't say that people shouldn't use emotion when playing a game, just that you shouldn't use appeal to emotion fallacies when making an argument.
 

Muspelheim

New member
Apr 7, 2011
2,023
0
0
ZippyDSMlee said:
What I am getting at is that humanity is incapable of doing anything different as we as a people are as mature as our most immature.

And while "we" revel in the usage of bad/sick/sad slang words there will always be other words to replace them in the common vernacular, at least until we no longer have need uncouth slang words.
The thing is, some people will be immature and keep using rape like a throwaway slur whatever happens, because of immaturity or operating on some weird principle system that trumps basic civility. However, I'm convinced that most people that does use rape in a needless way don't mean any harm, and simply haven't thought of it that way. They're just regular, good people who don't really mean to cause any distress or something, they just aren't aware of it. And I'm also convinced is that most people stop doing it once they've gotten a broader perspective of it. It's all about understanding, and articles and discussions like this spreads the awareness, and helps towards at least diminishing the careless use of that word, which honestly is what matters.

I try to live in hope, and I do think we can fix this. Most people mean no harm, and if they just see it from a new perspective, they will understand which words could be a regular It's no fun anymore-zone for most.
 

MatsVS

Tea & Grief
Nov 9, 2009
423
0
0
Helmholtz Watson said:
I didn't say that people shouldn't use emotion when playing a game, just that you shouldn't use appeal to emotion fallacies when making an argument.
The entire point is that careless usage of the word can cause an extreme emotional response. Ergo, appeals to emotion is entirely valid. I am sorry that you have none.
 

PortalThinker113

New member
Jul 13, 2010
140
0
0
I just want to express my sincere and heartfelt thanks to the author of this article. This piece was incredible and heart-wrenching, and as someone who has never been raped or dealt with trauma like that, seeing someone bare their emotions and soul like that was eye-opening, to say the least. I know that I can never understand what you've been through or how you feel, and that I am in no way qualified to discuss the subject of rape, but now I feel like I can understand at least a little better. This article was incredibly brave of you, and my hat is permanently off to you. My prayers, hugs, and best wishes go out to you.

Also, you should definitely think about writing more- this piece was very well-written in general.

As far as the discussion of the usage of the term "rape" and its potential harm in society, I'm going to echo what a few other people above me have said. Why? Why does the ability to use the word "rape" on Xbox Live matter to you so much? Is it that hard for one to just censor oneself a wee bit so that someone, somewhere has a better day than he or she would have otherwise? I'm not saying that everyone has to be paralyzed with fear of saying anything offensive all the time, but what positives do you even get out of using that word carelessly all the time? You don't have to engage in the second of mental effort that it would take to choose a different word? You can easily engage in proper amounts of trash talk while still being respectful and aware of the feelings of others. It is certainly not impossible, and it's not even that hard in the grand scheme of things. Just take a second to change a word, and you could be saving another human being a lot of hardship and pain.
 

ZippyDSMlee

New member
Sep 1, 2007
3,959
0
0
Muspelheim said:
ZippyDSMlee said:
What I am getting at is that humanity is incapable of doing anything different as we as a people are as mature as our most immature.

And while "we" revel in the usage of bad/sick/sad slang words there will always be other words to replace them in the common vernacular, at least until we no longer have need uncouth slang words.
The thing is, some people will be immature and keep using rape like a throwaway slur whatever happens, because of immaturity or operating on some weird principle system that trumps basic civility. However, I'm convinced that most people that does use rape in a needless way don't mean any harm, and simply haven't thought of it that way. They're just regular, good people who don't really mean to cause any distress or something, they just aren't aware of it. And I'm also convinced is that most people stop doing it once they've gotten a broader perspective of it. It's all about understanding, and articles and discussions like this spreads the awareness, and helps towards at least diminishing the careless use of that word, which honestly is what matters.

I try to live in hope, and I do think we can fix this. Most people mean no harm, and if they just see it from a new perspective, they will understand which words could be a regular It's no fun anymore-zone for most.
Imma glass is half empty siting on the sun soon to join the rest of humanity type of guy. Sadly...LOL
 

ischmalud

New member
Feb 5, 2011
145
0
0
that has to be hands down the saddest and most brutally honest thing ive read on this site sofar. granted Ive only been arround for a year or so but i bet id would hold true if id been here from the start.
now i am not even going to tough th xbla crap...let me put it this way i get posts banned for being offensive at times and i refuse to buy an xbox simple because of the online service althougth i know its a great console. nuff said
I thought a little about your last couple of paragraphs and realised I actually met the people who get that offensive in online games, here in australia we have internet gaming cafes all over the place and if u just sit in there and listen to the stuff kids playing in there say it makes you wanna weeping - emotional baggage or none and sadly enough it feels like they really want to hurt the people they are shouting at, it has nothing to do with sportsmanship, who knows they might have issues of their own.
Personally i take it as a sign that deep down humans are just that unfriendly and giving them the mask of the internet they will abuse the living hell out of anyone for any reason. you probably listened to this weeks podcast but susan gets very worked up about some of those things too, and i think it relates to some degree. As soon as you reintroduce social standarts like - having to put your real name - on the abuse that you throw at another person people (online at least) back off. sorry if i went off on a tangent of my own -
overall thanks for your article
 

Jeff Dunn

New member
Feb 29, 2012
43
0
0
Great article. To people arguing that this is somehow restricting free speech, it's really not. You're free to say whatever you want, especially within the comfort of people who you know aren't offended by dumb language, but why even risk hurting someone, unintentional or not? You don't use "fag" or "******" in public (if you feel uncomfortable reading that, good), so why use "rape" if it carries a similar potential for harm? And don't say humans are incapable of always being mature, there's no reason to give up on decency, even if it's an unlikely proposition.
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,503
0
0
MatsVS said:
Helmholtz Watson said:
I didn't say that people shouldn't use emotion when playing a game, just that you shouldn't use appeal to emotion fallacies when making an argument.
The entire point is that careless usage of the word can cause an extreme emotional response. Ergo, appeals to emotion is entirely valid. I am sorry that you have none.
Then people should avoid situations that can trigger such responses and no I don't have to put up with appeals to emotion.
 

MatsVS

Tea & Grief
Nov 9, 2009
423
0
0
Helmholtz Watson said:
MatsVS said:
Helmholtz Watson said:
I didn't say that people shouldn't use emotion when playing a game, just that you shouldn't use appeal to emotion fallacies when making an argument.
The entire point is that careless usage of the word can cause an extreme emotional response. Ergo, appeals to emotion is entirely valid. I am sorry that you have none.
Then people should avoid situations that can trigger such responses and no I don't have to put up with appeals to emotion.
So basically your right to be an asshole is more important than the right of a trauma victim to use a product he or she has paid money for without unduly suffering? Privilege much?
 

Evil Alpaca

New member
May 22, 2010
225
0
0
First, I want to thank the author of this peace. It takes courage to face this issue and even more to talk about it publicly.

Helmholtz Watson said:
it isn't my job to make sure that I don't offend people on the internet because they might be triggered by anything I say.
Its not your job, its common courtesy.

The author states how that sort of language can trigger emotional flashbacks and depression. It saps the fun from the individual and makes it hard for them to enjoy any interaction with the game or event. All you have to ask yourself is do you think saying obvious trigger words are worth the risk of completely ruining someone's fun.
 

Creatural

New member
Nov 19, 2009
31
0
0
Helmholtz Watson said:
MatsVS said:
Helmholtz Watson said:
I didn't say that people shouldn't use emotion when playing a game, just that you shouldn't use appeal to emotion fallacies when making an argument.
The entire point is that careless usage of the word can cause an extreme emotional response. Ergo, appeals to emotion is entirely valid. I am sorry that you have none.
Then people should avoid situations that can trigger such responses and no I don't have to put up with appeals to emotion.
People aren't psychic and cannot know which gamers are going to say rape to them beforehand. How do you propose they avoid these situations if they can't know before the fact? Never play games again? Never get involved in media at all perhaps?

That's extreme and unnecessary, especially when attachment to the word rape in the way that's used offensively can be nothing but an emotional one and makes no sense to stick to. These are all emotional responses, including the desire to keep using the word rape as it isn't used for accuracy, so whether you like it or not all sides are essentially talking about emotions here.

You're not in an argument without emotions involved everywhere. Emotional appeals in emotional arguments are valid too. You really need to study argument bases too if you want to use fallacies as some fallacies do not apply depending on what type of argument you're having.