The solution to all the world's problems

Recommended Videos

Timotei

The Return of T-Bomb
Apr 21, 2009
5,161
0
0
Valate said:
Suiseiseki IRL said:
Valate said:
What the hell are you on? Where can I get some?
The same man who sold the weed in Fast Times at Ridgemont High. Look for him.
Should I bring the explosives I was saving for bombing Fred Phelps?
No my child. Put them to their better, inteded use another time.
 

Kuchinawa212

New member
Apr 23, 2009
5,407
0
0
scifidownbeat said:
Liam Neeson?

Oh, drugs.

Not very original, but very classy, and I like the presentation. I'll take this to Barack Obama and see what he thinks.

Yes, I am Joe Biden.
Ooh cool! Can you tell him I say hi? You can throw that in while your trying to figure out how to explain why this is a good idea
 

GreyWolf257

New member
Oct 1, 2009
1,379
0
0
Sounds pretty fun, but I'm sure that EVERYTHING would be screwed up eventually. So many wrong things would come out of that.
 

riskroWe

New member
May 12, 2009
570
0
0
TheGreatCoolEnergy said:
On topic: This is possibly one of the dumbest ideas I have heard in a long, long time. Have you ever met someone who lights up on a regular basis(everyday)? They have no drive to do anything. Nothing would get done. Ever, at all, if a mandatory "Do drugs" law came in. And thats just pot. Add in all the phsycological problems and halucinations created by the hard drugs, and you have one big cluster fuck waiting to burst. It's just a bad idea.

And everything would smell like shit.
It seems your problem is with the legalisation of drugs in general and not with my idea which is a society ruled by a prolific drug user.

Nobody's forcing you to take them, as long as you remain chill. And it wouldn't be a rigidly enforced law either, our leader is far too relaxed to be a tight-arse about it. There'd be miles of leeway.

Kuchinawa212 said:
riskroWe said:
*snipped like a jew*
You're still talking about people being stoned out of their minds most of the time. Sure addection would go down over time. Since once it's perfectly normal people do as much of it as fast they can. They can take time. But no I'm not siding with you. It's still a fucking stupid idea. Say instead of weed, you used LSD. Yeah, what about the flashbacks. Jet fighter pilot was uptight in his yonger years and had a shot of LSD, he has a flashback in the middle of flight and when he comes too and can't pull up in time he crashs.

What good can come a world that lives like that. Getting high doesn't fix problems. It's a shitty rug to hid them under while you are high.
LSD isn't forced upon anybody though. Do you really think an airline would hire someone with a massive history of drug use? People aren't stupid when it comes to running a business. Non drug-users are far more desirable in just about every profession.

This is a society that favours people who can be relaxed without the aid of drugs, these people will go very far. Bit of evolution by artificial selection there.
 

dantheman931

New member
Dec 25, 2008
579
0
0
riskroWe said:
I have come to the conclusion that the single best form of government is a dictatorship led by an unassuming druggo. Think about it; his first law would be 'just fuckin relax', his second law would be legalising all drugs, and he wouldn't do much else than that because he has no aspirations of power. So the people would be free to do anything they wanted (as long as they remained calm).

The punishment for 'taking yourself too seriously' would be a compulsory session of marijuana usage. Society could proceed unhindered by special interest groups and an ignorant majority, since anyone who tries lobbying the government, or getting some artwork censored, or banning some kind of activity, or getting angry and kicking their dog, or protesting about fur coats or abortion or coal power or something, or suing over copyright infringement, or cheating to get ahead in business, is deemed 'uncool' and forced to smoke some grass until they calm the fuck down.

Thoughts?
[rant]

I don't know what irritates me more: The possibility that your life is so devoid of purpose that you've been reduced to trolling, or the possibility that you actually think this would be anything other than a massive clusterfuck. I'm going to assume that you're sincere, if for no other reason than that I'm bored enough to respond to such a retarded post.

First, define "too seriously." If I'm trying to get a promotion at work, does that count? You know what, forget I asked, because you can't fucking do it; it's way too subjective. And forcing someone to light up against their will for not measuring up to a standard that's purely in the eye of the beholder is just stupid beyond the telling of it.

Second, are you seriously suggesting that lobbying against abortion or suing to protect intellectual property are punishable offenses? Dude, you can eat a dick if you think that shit would ever fly in real life. I'm not saying I'm for or against either of those, but depriving people of their right to peaceable assembly AND due process? Holy fucking shit.

My advice to you is to put down the fucking pipe for ten minutes, sober the hell up, and reread what you've posted here on the Internet for all the world to see. Ask yourself if there's seriously a chance in hell that anyone would go for this. If you can honestly answer with anything other than "Jesus fucking Christ what was I thinking," go get a hammer or coffee mug or whatever other blunt heavy object you can lay your hands on, and drive it into your temple as hard as you can. Repeat as needed until you find yourself either (a) unable to form a cogent thought, or (b) in possession of a sense of fucking perspective.

[/rant]
 

effilctar

New member
Jul 24, 2009
1,495
0
0
riskroWe said:
effilctar said:
Is this another pro-drugs goofball saying all life's solutions are found in drugs?

NO NO NO! Life's solutions lie in empathy and the ability to see another's point of view.
It's not the drugs themselves that are useful, it's the drug user mentality of open-mindedness and consideration, which is quite coalescent with your comment.
You seem to be the only person in this thread who thinks it's a good idea. sorry but the whole concept of your idea is retarded, and I seriously hope you're on something while posting all this.


Thomas-101 said:
I have a smaller, simpler version to fix all problems, put Jeremy Clarckson in charge :)
Put Jezza in charge!? We'd be dead in a week.
Clarkson: "Oi, Muslims, yeah you. Ever noticed you've got a towel on your head?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNy1w4DV5Hw
 

TheGreatCoolEnergy

New member
Aug 30, 2009
2,581
0
0
So many things wrong with your arguemnts I don't know were to start...

riskroWe said:
Dude, dude, drugs are provided by the government at a discount price. And you can grow them in your yard legally. There's no need to steal or kill at all. :)
Also marijuana isn't incredibly addictive.
Yeah if you can grow your own weed why the fuck would you buy it? That was a very half baked idea right there(no pun intended).

riskroWe said:
People still meed money bro, nobody's gonna just quit their jobs :S
You may have heard of being fired? Cause I'm certain if people came to work stoned that is what would happen.

riskroWe said:
This doesn't even make sense...
Well maybe if you had read the whole post it would have. made alot of sense when I read it

riskroWe said:
The crime is not 'being serious', the crime is 'taking yourself too seriously'. And the definition of what qualifies as 'too seriously' is at the absolute discretion of our leader.
What is the difference between 'being serious' and 'taking yourself too seriously?'
 

Guy32

New member
Jan 4, 2009
743
0
0
Kuchinawa212 said:
So...drug everone out?

NO! TERRIBLE IDEA! Everything would crash since everyone would just you know say "...man just fuck it" to everything! Nothing would get done and we'd all collapse upon our selves

Did you honestly think this was a good idea? I mean really? Uhhh let's drug everone out man then if they start to get all up tight we force 'em to be drugged out. And then we'd all just kill all of our brain cells too. Yeah so we'd just be a society of retards
riskroWe said:
'just fuckin relax'
 

Kuchinawa212

New member
Apr 23, 2009
5,407
0
0
riskroWe said:
LSD isn't forced upon anybody though. Do you really think an airline would hire someone with a massive history of drug use? People aren't stupid when it comes to running a business. Non drug-users are far more desirable in just about every profession.

This is a society that favours people who can be relaxed without the aid of drugs, these people will go very far. Bit of evolution by artificial selection there.
First and foremost. Reported! Snipped like a jew? Really?

Sure it can be! Ohhh he took him self too seriously. BAM LSD in their vains. The only need to take it once to experince the flashbacks forever. And of course. If we were all care free we wouldn't have problems to worry about. But you're creating more since you force people to get high, which as I explained compiles problems
 

Eisenfaust

Two horses in a man costume
Apr 20, 2009
679
0
0
um... who does the farming and the hard stressful manufacturing jobs and shit if everyone's drugged out?
 

Pimppeter2

New member
Dec 31, 2008
16,475
0
0
JRCB said:
It would work terribly. Next thing you know, prostitution becomes legal, and the entire world gets renamed Amsterdam.

I have yet to see your point?

That somehow Amsterdam is bad? Heresy!
 

Baby Eater

Baruk Khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu!
Aug 27, 2009
24,173
0
0
riskroWe said:
Kuchinawa212 said:
So...drug everone out?

NO TERRIBLE IDEA! Everything would crash since everyone would just you know say "...man just fuck it" to everything! Nothing would get done and we'd all collapse upon our selves
Drug usage isn't forced upon you except as punishment for taking yourself too seriously. Sobriety is the norm, I assure you.
so if i murder a town i get to see magical colors and have a tea party with ben franklin and bowser? AWESOME!thats like getting paid to stare at a wall
 

Kuchinawa212

New member
Apr 23, 2009
5,407
0
0
Eisenfaust said:
um... who does the farming and the hard stressful manufacturing jobs and shit if everyone's drugged out?
Yes exactly. This is what I'm getting at OP. It would crumble upon it's self since no on would do anything! And the only responce to it to make them high which would only make it harder to make them do things. It's like taking a cop and binding his hands up after he doesn't catch a crook. And since he can't catch a crook with his arms tied they tie up his legs too. It just makes a hard problem worse!
 

riskroWe

New member
May 12, 2009
570
0
0
dantheman931 said:
riskroWe said:
*clip clop*
[rant]

I don't know what irritates me more: The possibility that your life is so devoid of purpose that you've been reduced to trolling, or the possibility that you actually think this would be anything other than a massive clusterfuck. I'm going to assume that you're sincere, if for no other reason than that I'm bored enough to respond to such a retarded post.
Thanks.

First, define "too seriously." If I'm trying to get a promotion at work, does that count? You know what, forget I asked, because you can't fucking do it; it's way too subjective. And forcing someone to light up against their will for not measuring up to a standard that's purely in the eye of the beholder is just stupid beyond the telling of it.
Actually the subjective becomes the objective when you put one person in charge. The definition is at the discretion of our leader, and he's a very lenient leader. Relax, pursuing a promotion would be well within the confines of normal behaviour. ;)

Second, are you seriously suggesting that lobbying against abortion or suing to protect intellectual property are punishable offenses? Dude, you can eat a dick if you think that shit would ever fly in real life. I'm not saying I'm for or against either of those, but depriving people of their right to peaceable assembly AND due process? Holy fucking shit.
There's nothing wrong with peaceable assembly, that should be self evident in the word 'peaceable'. It's when people start to get angry, like you just did, that problems ever arise from peaceable protests. If everyone presented their arguments calmly and rationally to our almighty leader, he could use his judgement (or the judgement of his advisors if he happens to be on a brutal acid trip) to determine a good solution.

My advice to you is to put down the fucking pipe for ten minutes, sober the hell up, and reread what you've posted here on the Internet for all the world to see. Ask yourself if there's seriously a chance in hell that anyone would go for this. If you can honestly answer with anything other than "Jesus fucking Christ what was I thinking," go get a hammer or coffee mug or whatever other blunt heavy object you can lay your hands on, and drive it into your temple as hard as you can. Repeat as needed until you find yourself either (a) unable to form a cogent thought, or (b) in possession of a sense of fucking perspective.

[/rant]
I've never taken any drugs before in my life, not even alcohol. :D
I'm gonna quote Aristotle here:
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."
 

TheGreatCoolEnergy

New member
Aug 30, 2009
2,581
0
0
riskroWe said:
TheGreatCoolEnergy said:
On topic: This is possibly one of the dumbest ideas I have heard in a long, long time. Have you ever met someone who lights up on a regular basis(everyday)? They have no drive to do anything. Nothing would get done. Ever, at all, if a mandatory "Do drugs" law came in. And thats just pot. Add in all the phsycological problems and halucinations created by the hard drugs, and you have one big cluster fuck waiting to burst. It's just a bad idea.

And everything would smell like shit.
It seems your problem is with the legalisation of drugs in general and not with my idea which is a society ruled by a prolific drug user.

Nobody's forcing you to take them, as long as you remain chill. And it wouldn't be a rigidly enforced law either, our leader is far too relaxed to be a tight-arse about it. There'd be miles of leeway.

Kuchinawa212 said:
riskroWe said:
*snipped like a jew*
You're still talking about people being stoned out of their minds most of the time. Sure addection would go down over time. Since once it's perfectly normal people do as much of it as fast they can. They can take time. But no I'm not siding with you. It's still a fucking stupid idea. Say instead of weed, you used LSD. Yeah, what about the flashbacks. Jet fighter pilot was uptight in his yonger years and had a shot of LSD, he has a flashback in the middle of flight and when he comes too and can't pull up in time he crashs.

What good can come a world that lives like that. Getting high doesn't fix problems. It's a shitty rug to hid them under while you are high.
LSD isn't forced upon anybody though. Do you really think an airline would hire someone with a massive history of drug use? People aren't stupid when it comes to running a business. Non drug-users are far more desirable in just about every profession.

This is a society that favours people who can be relaxed without the aid of drugs, these people will go very far. Bit of evolution by artificial selection there.
Wow this just keeps getting better by the second. First of all, way to contradict yourself. I'm pretty shure your original post stated that drug use would be mandatory until everyone was "chill". And I am not "chill". Not by a long shot. I dislike drug use, I dislike druggies, I dislike the idea of having to abuse a substance until I had no coherent opion left. I guarunty that you would have to through me in the slammer before I light up. It just doesn't appeal to me at all.

And if businesses wouldn't hire somebody because they do alot of drugs, who the fuck would they hire, seeing as how drugs are a mandatory practise. And on top of that, wouldn't that be considered "Too serious and uptight" and they would have to light up and hire him anyway? Face it, your theory makes as much sense as "Bomb 'em all, let God sort them out"

And everything would smell like shit.
 

effilctar

New member
Jul 24, 2009
1,495
0
0
Kuchinawa212 said:
riskroWe said:
LSD isn't forced upon anybody though. Do you really think an airline would hire someone with a massive history of drug use? People aren't stupid when it comes to running a business. Non drug-users are far more desirable in just about every profession.

This is a society that favours people who can be relaxed without the aid of drugs, these people will go very far. Bit of evolution by artificial selection there.
First and foremost. Reported! Snipped like a jew? Really?

Sure it can be! Ohhh he took him self too seriously. BAM LSD in their vains. The only need to take it once to experince the flashbacks forever. And of course. If we were all care free we wouldn't have problems to worry about. But you're creating more since you force people to get high, which as I explained compiles problems
Kuchi, I think we can agree that he's either the greatest troll ever to live, or smoking some of the best shit on the market.
 

riskroWe

New member
May 12, 2009
570
0
0
Kuchinawa212 said:
riskroWe said:
LSD isn't forced upon anybody though. Do you really think an airline would hire someone with a massive history of drug use? People aren't stupid when it comes to running a business. Non drug-users are far more desirable in just about every profession.

This is a society that favours people who can be relaxed without the aid of drugs, these people will go very far. Bit of evolution by artificial selection there.
First and foremost. Reported! Snipped like a jew? Really?
You need to relax bro, reporting someone for making a joke in bad taste is exactly what my idea is trying to combat. You can't honestly find that offensive? It doesn't hurt you, it's only words. You are the problem with society.

Sure it can be! Ohhh he took him self too seriously. BAM LSD in their vains. The only need to take it once to experince the flashbacks forever. And of course. If we were all care free we wouldn't have problems to worry about. But you're creating more since you force people to get high, which as I explained compiles problems
Except that my hypothetical society doesn't use LSD for that, we use marijuana. Remember?

eatmorebabiesmmg00d said:
riskroWe said:
Kuchinawa212 said:
So...drug everone out?

NO TERRIBLE IDEA! Everything would crash since everyone would just you know say "...man just fuck it" to everything! Nothing would get done and we'd all collapse upon our selves
Drug usage isn't forced upon you except as punishment for taking yourself too seriously. Sobriety is the norm, I assure you.
so if i murder a town i get to see magical colors and have a tea party with ben franklin and bowser? AWESOME!thats like getting paid to stare at a wall
I'm pretty sure the punishment for murdering a town is life imprisonment, not a trip on the green train. Use common sense here. :p