This Coffee Maker Has DRM to Lock Out Competitor's Refills - Update

Recommended Videos

michael87cn

New member
Jan 12, 2011
922
0
0
Coffee pod? The hell is that? I just use a coffee filter, a pitcher of water and some ground coffee beans.

THE HELL IS A COFFEE POD?

Stop spending a million dollars on coffee people...!
 

loc978

New member
Sep 18, 2010
4,897
0
0
Auberon said:
So how bout 'dem put in ground beans, water, wait a little while and pour from pan coffee makers?

Or stereotyping question: are Americans really this lazy?
Apparently some of us are. I'm pretty mystified by this. I've never even heard of a coffee maker that takes... "pods"... wouldn't stand for it, myself.

Everyone I know either grinds their own beans or doesn't drink coffee. Drip for quantity, espresso pots for quality, french press for when you're feeling lazy.
 

Keiichi Morisato

New member
Nov 25, 2012
354
0
0
Bara_no_Hime said:
Jorec said:
So what's to stop people from just using the original Keurig machines then? If that's the only substantial thing that the "Keurig 2.0" offers than I see no point in upgrading honestly, especially if the competitor's refills are in fact cheaper.
Well, sometimes coffee machines break, particularly if you use them often. If you're a Keurig loyalist, and they stop selling the original, then you might be forced to upgrade.

Keiichi Morisato said:
in america, if we want tea we nuke the water and add a tea bag of desired flavor, and add copious amounts of sugar or artificial sweetener.
Ugh, speak for yourself!

I buy my tea from Teavana and use a proper kettle, and I'm American. I even have one of those Teavana tea-presses (kinda like a French Press, but with tea).

As for sweetener, it depends on the tea, but I often use the natural sugar crystals they sell at Teavana.

I really like Teavana, okay?

Mumorpuger said:
French Press Master Race vs Keurig Drinking Peasants! I sense it brewing...
The problem is there's a third camp - the Espresso and Latte crowd. **raises hand** Oh, and also the Iced Coffee crowd. **raises hand again**

....

Wow, this post really makes me look like a caffeine fiend. Which I am, so... yeah, that's appropriate I guess.
i was talking about the average american, you know, the ones who buy their tea at Wal-Mart.
 

Bara_no_Hime

New member
Sep 15, 2010
3,644
0
0
Keiichi Morisato said:
i was talking about the average american, you know, the ones who buy their tea at Wal-Mart.
I'm plenty average. I buy a lot of my groceries at Wal Mart. I got my lunch today from a Super Wal-Mart.

I don't know anyone who makes tea in the microwave. Everyone I know boils it on the stove even if they're just making Liptons tea.

Or they make iced tea with powder packets.

Or they use those squirt thingys to change bottled water into iced tea. Those are really tasty - I use those myself.

Anyway...

Microwaved water doesn't boil properly due to the particular way microwaves heat water. That means the tea leaves don't interact properly with the water. Tea really does taste better if you boil it on the stove.
 

regalphantom

New member
Feb 10, 2011
211
0
0
Sleekit said:
just as long as you don't put the milk in first...

I know that this will probably be ignored since I'm a little late to the party, but the ISO would like a word with you:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3103

The standard was originally produced by the British Standards Institute then adapted by the ISO. Formally, tea should be brewed in either a glazed earthware or white porcelain teapot, with a mug of similar material. The tea should be added to the teapot roughly 20 seconds after pouring, at a rate of 2 grams per 100mL of boiling water. The standard brew time is 6 minutes, at which point the tea leaves should be removed and the tea poured. If milk is used, it is to be added BEFORE pouring at a rate of 1.25 mL per 100mL of the final tea solution (so if you added 2.5 mL of milk, you would pour 243.5 mL of tea)
 

J Tyran

New member
Dec 15, 2011
2,403
0
0
Sleekit said:
round here household coffee comes in a jar as far as most people are concerned.
a machine like that is generally seen as an unnecessary palaver.
Anyone that comes to my house and is stupid enough to ask for coffee gets Douwe Egberts instant outta the jar, I rare;y drink coffee in the first place so I don't want to buy a huge pretentious machine covered in levers that spews out coffee that all have pseudo Italianesque names.
 

Zeterai

New member
Oct 19, 2009
66
0
0
I've got a Keurig. I don't drink coffee, but I've got one. You can get a startling variety of different drink packs for them, ranging from apple cider to liquid-doughnut flavoured hot chocolate, and a significant amount of unique coffee flavours for the people who are into that. The thing is, almost all of the good ones are the sort of generic types that this DRM foolishness would block.

Keep in mind the reason I've got one is it produces instant hot drinks of a ludicrously wide range of types and flavours. If all it has going for it is instant coffee that Keurig sells, I'm not inclined to upgrade. The only ways I can think that they'd even get this DRM thing going is either some sort of optical reader on the powder container, or an RFID tag embedded inside. Both of these sounds stupid. Even moreso, the generic stuff not only tends to taste better but you can get them in massive, cheap, bulk quantities - another thing the DRM scheme will prevent.


Yea. Liquid doughnut hot chocolate. And Keurig wants to take that away from me. Screw you, Keurig. Screw you.
 

Paradoxrifts

New member
Jan 17, 2010
917
0
0
Thanks, but no thank you. I'll stick with literally anything else. Idiocy like this does not need any sort of encouragement whatsoever.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,485
0
0
This is getting fucking ridiculous. I just wanted to say that before moving on to the quoted text.

Fox12 said:
Somehow, I don't expect this to get the same level of ire as Microsoft did.
I'd disagree. Imagine a world where you DARE - YOU DARE - interfere with someone's morning coffee in some way. And imagine you're doing it repeatedly to everyone who doesn't want your brand, but might find your coffermaker useful and affordable. Now, something like this can end in one of two ways: With violence or with public outcry, demands for refunds, and a general boycotting of your product because we want our goddamn coffee without any strings attached.

If you're the maker's manufacturer, you hope and pray for the latter, and dread the notion of a series of coffee-machine-launching trebuchets attacking the company and all within it. People who get their cuppa interfered with at any hour of the day are irritable, cranky, and liable to snap at you. People who get theirs interrupted on purpose and with some sort of malice or undesirable intent involved are liable to punch you right through walls with that superhuman strength phenomenon that appears when people are desperate, under stress, or in a blatant rage...of which all of these can apply, even at once!
 

Excludos

New member
Sep 14, 2008
353
0
0
This has been completely normal in Norway for many years now. Surprised this isn't the case already elsewhere.
 

Queen Michael

has read 4,010 manga books
Jun 9, 2009
10,397
0
0
Is there any chance at all that this'll actually work? I can't imagine people buying this if they know about the DRM.
 

blackrave

New member
Mar 7, 2012
2,018
0
0
It's getting worse people.
Soon we will have footwear with DRM that will prevent you from walking if you don't wear approved socks
It's just a matter of time.
 

OneCatch

New member
Jun 19, 2010
1,110
0
0
Sleekit said:
i don't actually know anyone...nor have i in fact ever known that i can remember...who actually owns and uses a dedicated coffee machine.

mostly on account of us having these great things called "kettles"...

is this like some huge "in every kitchen" brand name i'm not aware of ?
Wales here, I think it's more an American thing. Though they are trying to break into the UK market. Just look in the 'middle class crap' section of any good department store!

I hate coffee (and John-fucking-Lewis) so this won't affect me in the slightest.
Reminds me of proprietary ink cartridges and printer cables though. That does piss me off!
 

ckam

Make America Great For Who?
Oct 8, 2008
1,618
0
0
Oh, this is ? sad. Good thing I don't drink much coffee except from cans and powder.
 

IamLEAM1983

Neloth's got swag.
Aug 22, 2011
2,578
0
0
I'm not even remotely worried. Ten to one that a couple YouTube vids pop up after the release of the new models, all showing us how to circumvent those measures. If the only thing you're risking is a voided warranty, I'm sure single-cup coffee maker hacking is going to take off pretty successfully.
 

razer17

New member
Feb 3, 2009
2,518
0
0
Sleekit said:
i don't actually know anyone...nor have i in fact ever known that i can remember...who actually owns and uses a dedicated coffee machine.

mostly on account of us having these great things called "kettles"...

is this like some huge "in every kitchen" brand name i'm not aware of ?

...cause if not surely a smart, "discerning" coffee consumer would just buy a machine they can put any coffee they want in ?...

in which case...great move making people not want to buy your coffee machine guys...
In my house they have a kettle, a coffee maker that uses actual beans, and one of these little pod machines. The pod one does seem like it't just really lazy. It tastes a bit better than the granule stuff, but not as good as proper coffee, but costs twice as much. Why have all 3? Kettle for the quick fix, coffee machine for the enjoyment.

Except for the fact that I can't understand how people find coffee enjoyable.
 

Roxas1359

Burn, Burn it All!
Aug 8, 2009
33,758
1
0
We actually have that machine in our shop at SDSU. Reason is because everyone gets in at 5-6am and the only coffee on campus is overpriced Starbucks. They enjoy the machine really, and I will say it makes some good hot chocolate. :3
Also this technically isn't DRM, since DRM stands for Digital Rights Management. If anything this is CRM, Coffee Rights Management.
 

klaynexas3

My shoes hurt
Dec 30, 2009
1,525
0
0
Expected to launch this fall, and fall this launch.

But seriously, it's mostly sad to think that your common coffee company is an evil moustache twirling douche bag. Hell, I imagine heads of tobacco companies aren't this scummy. It's not even evil, it's just stupid. I can't see the common person running with this. Even they would give up after a day or two of that BS. If it doesn't scratch their ass and feed them nachos, common people will not buy it. Especially with coffee. It won't even be a backlash, it just won't sell.
 

Alpha Maeko

Uh oh, better get Maeko!
Apr 14, 2010
573
0
0
It is absolutely imperative that your toast shouldn't toast right if it isn't OUR bread. For safety reasons, of course!