ErrrorWayz said:
DefunctTheory said:
Glongpre said:
I was once pulled over by a policeman for not having a bell on my bike...
Where in the hell do you live where bells are mandatory?
England!
But it only applies to new bikes being sold, it's quite funny because if you spend ?6000 on a super light weight off road beast they have to attach a stupid bell to it, you are perfectly within your rights to remove it and they now attach them (or used to, the rules were such a joke it may have been repealed) with a single screw turn so you can rip it off asap. Our local shop used to give you a fiver off if you removed your bell immediately after sale and threw it in their bell recycling bin (obviously to be attached to the next one).
It's a toss up whether this or invading Iraq was Tony Blair's most stupid move.
Yeah, because god forbid you're zooming about on it (roads, landscape) and come across people who are facing away from, its windy/loud traffic so they can't hear your bikes gears/you're freewheeling and you and you need to let them know. I suppose you could shout, as long as your voice is loud enough/not carried away by the wind or you're wearing mouth covering gear...whereas most bike bells are set to a tonal level that can carry through the wind for that VERY PURPOSE!
I mean, who cares if you hit them because they move unexpectedly, right? On a bike made out of injury causing material, at a speed that can injure.
Sorry, but anyone with a bike who wants to ride it around? Bell, crash hat, lights/reflectors and if I had my way a goddamn licence plate like cars so you can be reported for breaking the rules like drivers. Too many bikers are dangerous/think the rules don't apply to them.