TLOU2 Review Thread

Kwak

Elite Member
Sep 11, 2014
2,327
1,862
118
Country
4
Appealing (pandering) to a small percentage of the population has a chance to turn off those who aren't in that minority. That's not discrimination, that's demographics.
So how did anyone enjoy playing the last of us if they weren't a 14 year old girl named Ellie or a 40-year old man who lost a daughter in tragic circumstances?
Why don't those details alienate 99.99999 percent of the population?
 
Last edited:

Houseman

Mad Hatter Meme Machine.
Legacy
Apr 4, 2020
3,910
760
118
So how did anyone enjoy playing the last of us if they weren't a 14 year old girl named Ellie or a 40-year old man who lost a daughter in tragic circumstances?
Why don't those details alienate 98 percent of the population?
Because "manly man protects child" is a popular trope, and has been for some time. It's like "Damsel in distress", but instead the damsel isn't locked away in another castle, she or he is by your side the whole time.

Trying to say "unless you're EXACTLY like the characters, you don't fit the target audience!" is a bit of a stretch. Nobody here ever said anything like that.
 

Specter Von Baren

Annoying Green Gadfly
Legacy
Aug 25, 2013
5,637
2,856
118
I don't know, send help!
Country
USA
Gender
Cuttlefish
This is overlooking a huge amount of baggage attached to the word "normal". Culturally, "abnormal" or "not normal" does not merely refer to something being "atypical". The term "atypical" is neutral, without judgement; the term "abnormal" is, 90% of the time, used as a condemnation or censure.

As it applies to people, "abnormal" takes on additional negative connotations as a result of its historical usage. If you're fine using the term, that's great; but other people aren't going to be coming at it with the same experience or free from that baggage. Other people will more than likely have only ever heard the term "abnormal" used as an insult when directed at people, as that's the most common usage by far; and it wouldn't be unreasonable to assume it's meant that way again.

Take the term "bastard" as another example. Sure, technically it merely refers to the child of unwed parents, which is a pretty common scenario nowadays. Yet the history of the term in reference to people is almost exclusively an insult.
Which does not really matter when it comes to definitions. The fact will still be that it is not normal no matter how much you say it makes people feel bad so the only logical course of action, in my eyes at any rate, is still to own up to it being weird and say, "So what?"

Yes, it will make people feel bad, I felt very bad being picked on for being weird when I was a kid but owning up to my weirdness and accepting that I was not the norm led to better self-esteem than if I had just pretended it didn't exist and I believe that everyone else that feels that way should also learn to be accepting of themselves rather than skirting around terms all day.
 

CriticalGaming

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 28, 2017
11,227
5,682
118
This seems like a roundabout way of saying "I'm not against gays, but I just don't want them in my games."
Except I didn't say that at all. I dont want characters to be gay because of tolken homosexuality. If you had read my other posts about making Ellie go on a journey to save a girl shes likes while discovering her true sexuality (gay) on the way, that would have been great.

But she's gay because, and frankly in the post apocalypse LBGT doesn't make much sense in a population that is on the verge of extinction. Hell you could have had some interesting conflict with the "colony" trying to pressure Ellie into a hetro relationship she doesn't want because humans need to breed in this world. There are so many other cool dynamic themes you could have played with to really build her sexuality as a core of her character, instead she's gay just because they fucking felt like it and didn't write around it.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,175
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Except I didn't say that at all. I dont want characters to be gay because of tolken homosexuality. If you had read my other posts about making Ellie go on a journey to save a girl shes likes while discovering her true sexuality (gay) on the way, that would have been great.
But why does it have to be that way? Why can't she just be gay, and not a big deal made out of it?

Writing this, I realize that I've made an argument that many people who are against "pandering" would make, so I'll put it this way:

-Ellie being gay = Fine.

-Ellie discovering she's gay = Fine

That said, it seems a bit iffy to criticize one of those things, because it puts us in a no win situation. But to your post in particular, I'm not sure why Ellie NOT going on a journey of self-discovery is an issue, because if it is, then it behoves us to ask why we don't make similar demands of other characters.

I mean, if Ellie was replaced by "Elliot," would we even be having this conversation? Because frankly, I doubt it, aside from maybe a few fringe nutters who'd complain that "Elliot" kissing Riley would be miscegenation or something.

But she's gay because, and frankly in the post apocalypse LBGT doesn't make much sense in a population that is on the verge of extinction.
Yeah, I'm sure Ellie chose to be gay during the apocalypse.

Hell you could have had some interesting conflict with the "colony" trying to pressure Ellie into a hetro relationship she doesn't want because humans need to breed in this world. There are so many other cool dynamic themes you could have played with to really build her sexuality as a core of her character, instead she's gay just because they fucking felt like it and didn't write around it.
Yes, you could do that, but if you're criticizing a work for something it doesn't do, then that can potentially stretch ad infinitum.

But again, why does Ellie's sexuality have to be core to her character?
 

CriticalGaming

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 28, 2017
11,227
5,682
118
But again, why does Ellie's sexuality have to be core to her character?
Because they are purposefully highlighting it. I've said for a long time that characters being or not being gay doesn't really matter unless their is relationship choices within a game (ala mass effect, dragon age, etc.)

Mario could be gay and it wouldn't change anything or mean anything. Yet people want more gay characters in the games for reasons, because a character's sexually makes them more relatable somehow. Which is fine, so give players the choice to make the character gay or not.

If you are going to make a character gay, then write it into the story in order for it to matter. Like I said originally, Dina getting kidnapped could yield her as the "princess" that Ellie has to save and it'd be cool.

Though maybe all of this is a big deal because the game that we did get, is just a revenge porn game, and doesn't do well with the characters we know any love already, which makes it feel bad as a sequel.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,142
4,907
118
It's not as if a movie or a game exists in a vacuum. There are always multiple different factors at play. People who came for Captain America might sit through Black Panther or Captain Marvel so as to not miss out on important plot points that will be used in sequels, like Infinity War, and Spiderman: Far From Home.

So that doesn't disprove my argument.
If your argument is 'pandering to minorities is a huge turn off to the majority' then it kind of does disprove it. Because people, all people, went to go see it. It didn't turn them off from seeing the next Marvel movie just because most of the cast was black. And if what you say is true, it should have regardless of the Marvel brand.

You think that a disconnected Black Panther movie that isn't part of the connected cinematic universe would do as well?
As well, no. Well in general, yes. It's Black Panther; you'd have the Marvel fans already. Remember Blade? It was a huge hit before Marvel movies were even a thing, and it starred a black dude. Brides Maids was a huge hit despite being all women. And with both of those cases it wasn't just black people/women that went to go see it.

You think that white people regularly flock to Tyler Perry movies? Of course not. Why not? Discrimination? No, demographics.
Yeah, that's a bit of an extreme example, don't you think? Tyler Perry is kind of one of those weird fringe cases, like Christian hallmark movies.

This seems a little ridiculous to even explain. It seems like common sense that games are made for, and marketed towards, specific target audiences. Games about Barbie are aimed at little girls. Tyler Perry is aimed at black people. Shounen is aimed at teenage boys. Rom Coms are aimed at women. The further away you are from the target audience, the less likely it is that you'll ever consume that media. This is all common knowledge, isn't it?
And yet, most of these will have a lot of people from outside of that target audience consuming and enjoying it. You have adults loving cartoons, girls loving action movies and games, and guys loving rom-coms. And not just a small percentage.

And regarding TLoU2, were not even talking about a game that is specifically aimed toward the LGBTQ. I mean, what queer themes have we seen thus far, the kind that would make straight people think 'I don't relate to this'? Just a kiss?
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,175
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Because they are purposefully highlighting it.
Yes, one single trailer out of who knows how many. Oh, the horror.

Mario could be gay and it wouldn't change anything or mean anything.
It actually would, because Peach clearly has the hots for Mario, and Mario seems reciprocal to them.

Yet people want more gay characters in the games for reasons, because a character's sexually makes them more relatable somehow. Which is fine, so give players the choice to make the character gay or not.
Except that's not how things actually work.

If you have a game like Mass Effect or Dragon Age, sure. Follow your heart to your own heart's content. But it's iffy if you're saying that games making the character hetrosexual is fine, whereas homosexual should entirely be in the purview of player choice. What's wrong with a creator simply saying "the character's gay?" Again, in Naughty Dog, no-one flipped out over CrashxTawna, or JakxKiera, or NathanxElena, but suddenly people flip out over Ellie. You only need one guess as to why, and that says more about the people flipping out than Naughty Dog.

If you are going to make a character gay, then write it into the story in order for it to matter. Like I said originally, Dina getting kidnapped could yield her as the "princess" that Ellie has to save and it'd be cool.
OR, you could write your story where your character is gay, and have that be part of their character, but not the definition of it.

I seriously don't get why your view is that any gay character in a game (and maybe other media) has to be defined by their sexuality.

Also, as an aside, "save the princess" is an old trope, and I'm not making the argument that it's "sexist" or "problematic," I'm arguing that it's tired. Again, using another Naughty Dog IP, Crash saves Tawna in the first game, but Coco came afterwards, and is much higher regarded, by virtue of being an actual character. It's part of why Mario games don't appeal to me on any level of story (oh no, Peach has been kidnapped again because she refuses to invest in castle security), while Sonic, for instance, actually transformed Amy from a damsel in distress to a character that...well, that depends on which Amy you're talking about, but at least a better one whose original purpose was to turn up, be kidnapped, and be rescued.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,142
4,907
118
I'm not paying full price for it i don't think. I did that for RE3 recently and regretted it.
This has been the year of major disappointments. If TLoU2 ends up being shit, which judging from it's obxious tone might very well be the case, it'll complete the trifecta along with RE3 Remake and the ending to FF7 Remake.

*sigh*
 

Houseman

Mad Hatter Meme Machine.
Legacy
Apr 4, 2020
3,910
760
118
If your argument is 'pandering to minorities is a huge turn off to the majority' then it kind of does disprove it. Because people, all people, went to go see it
'Pandering', or "targeting" doesn't have to be done to one group at a time. You can 'target' multiple demographics at once, or you can just target one. Black Panther targets multiple demographics at once. Tyler Perry movies... not so much.

I never said that "if there's a minority character as the lead, then that means the movie is EXCLUSIVELY targeted at that minority and therefore everyone else will be turned off". That's not what I think.

And yet, most of these will have a lot of people from outside of that target audience consuming and enjoying it.
Yep. That's not a problem, nor does it disprove the existence of targeted demographics.

I mean, what queer themes have we seen thus far, the kind that would make straight people think 'I don't relate to this'? Just a kiss?
It's not about 'not relating', some people just don't like homosexuality. It doesn't appeal to them. These people aren't necessarily bigots anymore than a white person isn't necessarily a bigot for not being interested in a Jordan Peele movie (Get Out, specifically).

And yes, just the kiss.
 

Phoenixmgs

The Muse of Fate
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
9,628
830
118
w/ M'Kraan Crystal
Gender
Male
You’re literally confirming what I’ve been saying, in that your mind is already made up about the game before you’ve even played it, just based on what those guys said and your previous experience with Naughty Dog games.

I don’t see why they had to use footage of other games either when describing things that have already been shown several times in this game. Expansive environments, boat gameplay and burning backgrounds aren’t spoiler territory and it seems they’re just being spiteful due to the leak drama that might’ve affected them earlier.

Being able to go prone and crawl around under vehicles (where patrols will still look for you and yank you out by a leg if found), still having access to your gear and crafting, getting knocked on your back from a gunshot and being able to fire from that position, being able to take hostages and interrogate before killing them, horseback traversal, using a boat for further stealth, etc. Do those sound like typical Naughty Dog gameplay mechanics? To me that sounds like they took cues from MGSV and even expanded upon it.

But of course, we wouldn’t know much of that just going by what Rurikhan or Skill Up said.
Skillup said he could only use footage from 3 specific sections of the game as per the embargo. There were certain key things I was looking for in the reviews. I wanted to know how long the game is because playing a 20+ hour long TLOU game does not sound very enticing to me, and TLOU2 seems to be in the 25 hour neighborhood. I also wanted to know how "open world" the game was as I didn't want an open world TLOU, which from the reviews it's still linear level design but in bigger sized levels. I also wanted to know their opinions on the story and whether it's something great or not.

Skillup mentioned you can go prone and even showed a clip of Ellie crawling under a car. I fully understand how being able to crawl around in a stealth game impacts the gameplay, there's many games where you can go prone. I get what getting knocked on your back from a gunshot does for gameplay, there's been other games that do this. TLOU1 had taking hostages already, that's not new. I'm guessing interrogation won't be as interesting/impactful as MGS3. I'm also guessing you can't utilize the horse in combat like say Horizon and I'm pretty sure it's just for transversal purposes, also Rurikhan showed horse riding. The reason I'm saying it's not like MGS5 is because of the feel of the gunplay and combat. MGS5 or the last Splinter Cell (Blacklist) or Horizon or Ghost Recon Future Soldier are all far more fluid, responsive, fast-paced, and arcade-y compared to TLOU that's far more deliberate. It's like trying to say Dark Souls (TLOU) is like Sekiro (MGS5) in feel of combat even if both games let the player do the same functions; yeah you can jump in Dark Souls but it ain't nearly like jumping in Sekiro.

Lastly, there's a far better stealth game that comes out a mere 3 days before TLOU2, which is Desperados 3 that I already pre-ordered (mainly because I don't have confidence Best Buy will have it if I didn't pre-order). And, there's quite a few other games that I think I will enjoy more than TLOU2 that I haven't gotten to like Outer Wilds for example. I'll get to TLOU2 when I don't have anything on my to-play list that I think I'll like better or when I'm in the mood to play a TLOU game. Hell, I bought Hitman 1 (and possibly the 2nd game) and haven't played it yet and Hitman's gameplay is more interesting than TLOU. It's not like I'm not playing TLOU2 because Rurikhan and Skillup told me not to, it's because Naughty Dog has much higher miss rate than other devs along with more standard gameplay that is more polished for sure but not as interesting either.
 
Last edited:

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,142
4,907
118
It's not about 'not relating', some people just don't like homosexuality. It doesn't appeal to them. These people aren't necessarily bigots anymore than a white person isn't necessarily a bigot for not being interested in a Jordan Peele movie (Get Out, specifically).
If it's specifically because it stars a black person, then yes, that is extremely bigoted.

And saying things like 'some people just don't like homosexuality' is exactly why so many closested gays are afraid of coming out, not to mention the violence and harshment inflicted on them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yoshi

Dreiko

Elite Member
Legacy
May 1, 2020
2,927
995
118
CT
Country
usa
Gender
male, pronouns: your majesty/my lord/daddy
But why does it have to be that way? Why can't she just be gay, and not a big deal made out of it?

Writing this, I realize that I've made an argument that many people who are against "pandering" would make, so I'll put it this way:

-Ellie being gay = Fine.

-Ellie discovering she's gay = Fine
You're trying to have your cake and eat it too.

Either you will have people celebrating Ellie being gay like I playacted in this post:


Or you'll have it not be a big deal.

You can't do both. You're speaking out of both ends of your mouth and saying conflicting things.


The moment people chose to celebrate this in my opinion nothingburger common thing of no consequence, the chance for it to be taken as just a minor element of no consequence was abandoned.

I personally am resisting this and continue to treat it as an insignificant component of an infinitely greater whole but I can definitely see why others aren't doing the same in the environment that was cultivated surrounding this subject.

And saying things like 'some people just don't like homosexuality' is exactly why so many closested gays are afraid of coming out, not to mention the violence and harshment inflicted on them.
Isn't that just a normal thing though? Like how people who like BDSM or are furries are closeted oftentimes as well? Are people supposed to not express that something disgusts them or repels them because someone else who is into that thing whatever it is is closeted?

I think closeting is more to do with a conservative mindset and family environment than with what it is you're closeted about. It's less about being gay and more about being old-fashioned and living with judgemental pricks that's to do with whether you'll closet yourself or not.
 

Houseman

Mad Hatter Meme Machine.
Legacy
Apr 4, 2020
3,910
760
118
If it's specifically because it stars a black person, then yes, that is extremely bigoted.
You know how British comedy is it's own unique thing? African-American comedy is too. They each draw from what that culture finds funny, and may involve situations that are more likely to occur in that culture. Sometimes I'll watch a British comedy sketch and not get a joke or two because I'm unfamiliar with what they reference. It doesn't make me racist against British people to say "this doesn't appeal to me". Same thing with African-American comedy.

And if someone makes that judgement based on the thumbnail being a picture of a black man, or an Asian man, or a Indian man, or a Caucasian man, I think that's fine too.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,175
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
You're trying to have your cake and eat it too.

Either you will have people celebrating Ellie being gay like I playacted in this post:

Or you'll have it not be a big deal.

You can't do both. You're speaking out of both ends of your mouth and saying conflicting things.
How?

I'm saying that Naughty Dog should be able to write a story how they see fit. CG seems to be operating on the assumption that if a person is gay, it has to be relevant to the story. Neither of this has to do with "celebrating" it.

I'll put it this way. Last of Us is a story where a character happens to be gay. Boy Erased is a story where the character's sexuality is intrinsic to the story. Both are fine. Both exist. To shift the paradigm a bit, it's the difference between a romance story, and a story with romance in it. Both of these things exist. To say that any story with a gay character has to focus on the character's sexuality is nonsense. Saying that any story with a gay character shouldn't focus n the character's sexuality is also nonsense. Both can exist.

The moment people chose to celebrate this in my opinion nothingburger common thing of no consequence, the chance for it to be taken as just a minor element of no consequence was abandoned.

I personally am resisting this and continue to treat it as an insignificant component of an infinitely greater whole but I can definitely see why others aren't doing the same in the environment that was cultivated surrounding this subject.
Wait, are we disagreeing, or not? Because I more or less agree that the point to strive for is for no-one to blink an eye, that celebrating a gay character would be like celebrating a female character.

Right now, the thing appears to be that Ellie being gay is "woke" or "pushing an agenda." Personally, I disagree. If Naughty Dog was trying to pat themselves on the back at every opportunity, I'd roll my eyes at that as well.

(Are we eating ourselves on this thread?)
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,142
4,907
118
You know how British comedy is it's own unique thing? African-American comedy is too. They each draw from what that culture finds funny, and may involve situations that are more likely to occur in that culture. Sometimes I'll watch a British comedy sketch and not get a joke or two because I'm unfamiliar with what they reference. It doesn't make me racist against British people to say "this doesn't appeal to me". Same thing with African-American comedy.

And if someone makes that judgement based on the thumbnail being a picture of a black man, or an Asian man, or a Indian man, or a Caucasian man, I think that's fine too.
Yeah, that's still bigoted. That's judging someone on the colour of their skin and deciding you're not going to like what they have to say.

But okay, if we disregard that and bring this back to TLoU2, what's stopping these people from just ignoring it, saying 'this just isn't for me cuz gay', and move on? I mean, it would still be problematic, but fine. But these people aren't ignoring it, they're fucking pissed off that there's gayness in this game, accusing it of pandering, and assuming all the positive reviews are a conspiracy. This is weird hateful behaviour, not live-and-let-live.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yoshi and BrawlMan

Dreiko

Elite Member
Legacy
May 1, 2020
2,927
995
118
CT
Country
usa
Gender
male, pronouns: your majesty/my lord/daddy
Yeah, that's still bigoted. That's judging someone on the colour of their skin and deciding you're not going to like what they have to say.

But okay, if we disregard that and bring this back to TLoU2, what's stopping these people from just ignoring it, saying 'this just isn't for me cuz gay', and move on? I mean, it would still be problematic, but fine. But these people aren't ignoring it, they're fucking pissed off that there's gayness in this game, accusing it of pandering, and assuming all the positive reviews are a conspiracy. This is weird hateful behaviour, not live-and-let-live.
I liken that to vegetarians eating a tomato sauce they like in vegetarian-seeming pasta and then finding out there was beef bones in the stock that went into the sauce. Learning you enjoyed something you dislike on a fundamental level can feel like you were tricked in some sense.

I do think it's a small-minded way to be, and that a rational person would just reexamine their stance if they did indeed enjoy this thing with the lesbian, but either way there you have it, that's the reason. If this was part of the full game and not the dlc that some people never played the reaction to this game would be different.


How?

I'm saying that Naughty Dog should be able to write a story how they see fit. CG seems to be operating on the assumption that if a person is gay, it has to be relevant to the story. Neither of this has to do with "celebrating" it.

I'll put it this way. Last of Us is a story where a character happens to be gay. Boy Erased is a story where the character's sexuality is intrinsic to the story. Both are fine. Both exist. To shift the paradigm a bit, it's the difference between a romance story, and a story with romance in it. Both of these things exist. To say that any story with a gay character has to focus on the character's sexuality is nonsense. Saying that any story with a gay character shouldn't focus n the character's sexuality is also nonsense. Both can exist.



Wait, are we disagreeing, or not? Because I more or less agree that the point to strive for is for no-one to blink an eye, that celebrating a gay character would be like celebrating a female character.

Right now, the thing appears to be that Ellie being gay is "woke" or "pushing an agenda." Personally, I disagree. If Naughty Dog was trying to pat themselves on the back at every opportunity, I'd roll my eyes at that as well.

(Are we eating ourselves on this thread?)
I think we mostly agree. I just don't think naughty dog's previous statements and the multitudes of leaks they had indicate that they're just neutrally making a game that happens to be that way. If not patting themselves, they're definitely presenting their back in a very inviting way to the woke crowds lol.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,175
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
I think we mostly agree. I just don't think naughty dog's previous statements and the multitudes of leaks they had indicate that they're just neutrally making a game that happens to be that way. If not patting themselves, they're definitely presenting their back in a very inviting way to the woke crowds lol.
If Naughty Dog HAS been patting themselves on the back, then I would agree that should be called out, or a "yeah, whatever mate." That said, I can criticize both.

An ideal place to be on the issue of representation would be when no-one freaks out about it, and no-one pats themselves on the back for it either.
 

BrawlMan

Lover of beat'em ups.
Legacy
Mar 10, 2016
29,386
12,230
118
Detroit, Michigan
Country
United States of America
Gender
Male
Seriously, the game is less than a week release and people here already going nuts. For those in the deep worry or uncomfortable, can you at least wait until the game fucking comes out?