Magmarock said:
This right here is hilarious. I mean it, this is the funniest piece of text I have seen in a long time. Why would you say this, or say it in this way.
You have low standards for comedy, my friend.
Magmarock said:
I'll admit it might have been a bit of a childish response since I didn't like the tone of your reply. But to then guarantee that you've been louder then I have almost as if turning it not a competition makes me lol. You contradicted yourself.
Oh I'm well aware that I hold the show to an impossible standard. That said, even by a relaxed standard, they fuck stuff up they really have no reason to fuck up. It's aggravating. As for "contradicting myself", I have no idea what on earth you are talking about. Apparently you still feel we're having some kind of argument. Let it go.
Magmarock said:
Well you're half right. It's not I who is imagining you as red faced its' you who is imaging me as red faced I think. I am not throwing a strop I am expressing my disappointment and concern that the show may have jumped the shark and pulled a Lost. Remember Lost, started great and then turned crap. I don?t want this to happen with GoT since it's one of a very few shows that I watch.
I remember Lost. The two shows are
radically different. In order to 'pull a Lost' GoT would have to layer the show three assholes deep with mysteries they had no intention of solving, and do a dramatic left turn in the final season from "mystery plot-driven show" to "emotional character driven resolution". I didn't HATE the ending of Lost because I "got it", but I can certainly understand why people were pissed off. Your issue with GoT appears to focus around what TV Tropes calls:
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DarknessInducedAudienceApathy
...which is really down to individual taste. Be careful looking at examples in there. You WILL find A Song of Ice and Fire, and there ARE spoilers.
Given you are at about the halfway point of Martin's narrative, I think it's a bit early to declare the series is all about "the bad guys win". It's rather like getting most of the way through Empire Strikes Back, shouting "What's this? Vader wins? Luke loses a hand? Hans frozen! Fuck this, this stupid series is all about the bad guys winning!". It's a bit...how to say...pre-emptive? Since we're not to SPOIL you, the next best route to take seemed to be to suggest you take a deep breath and keep watching. You're NOT going to get traditional fantasy "good triumphs" out of this show or series. You're not. But you're not going to get relentlessly buggered, either.
Magmarock said:
No you're not posting spoilers but I felt that your comment distracted from the issue. Any criticism directed at the story presented in the show can not be excused by simply stating "well that's how it is in the book," because if that's the case the book bares the same criticism. Therefore it is irrelevant.
Well, it's NOT though. The show either follows the framework of the books, or it goes off and does its own thing. And based on the quality we've had so far when it's done that, you
do not want the show doing its own thing. Which means the event that occurred that pissed you off so much...Oberyn dying...that NEEDED to happen. There was no way around it. Short of the Mountain gently smothering him with a pillow, how exactly could the show have stayed faithful to the source material and not annoyed you?
If you have specific issues about how the show handled the choreography, or want to complain that Pascal made Oberyn too sympathetic, or want to complain the new Mountain was too huggy-bear, or any of a million other things, that's cool. When you start complaining that Oberyn DIED, though, then "That's what happened in the books" is, in fact, a fairly valid rebuttal. Why not keep Ned Stark alive, then? Why not undo the Red Wedding and have it be a lively, lovely affair? The entire narrative starts unspooling when you fuck around with major events. Even minor changes they've made have resulted in all kinds of weird, atonal bullshit and screwed up timelines.