People are not unhappy because they changed something, they are unhappy because they changed so much that there's no real connection between what they are presenting and the game that they are "updating".Simonism451 said:2k, can't you just tape over the name and write "Alien Shooter '62" on the box instead. That's apparently all it takes to shut the fanboys up.
Erm sorry, I mean:
Another franchise ruined forever! Boycott 2k for raping our memories! Raping, I say, raaaaaping!
In other words:
Fans being unhappy, news at eleven!
Fallout 3 had major changes compared to Fallout 2, but they still had the same set pieces (zombies, rad scorps, mutants, vault boy), environmental setting, familiar companion systems and a general Mad Max feel. The enemies of the original Xcom games are absent, and the original environment (as someone else has said) of taking place on an incredibly brutal worldwide battlefield with an immense squad of soldiers is scaled down with safety measures like regening health, revives and limiting you to a 3 man squad.
The main point here is that if they are confident that their game is of high quality and a "contemporary" title, why do they need to directly associate with such an old series when their game bares so little resemblance to it.
They've got husks, they've got the power wheel, they've got the galaxy map as a map of the USA, all of which already make it more recognizable as connected to the Mass Effect series than the Xcom franchise.
That's the issue, not that they've changed something.
TL
That reasoning makes 2K's decision to name it Xcom even MORE confusing. We're just people are the internet, they're a multi-million dollar company and THEY'RE the ones sinking big money into the Xcom name.theonecookie said:I don't get you people you seem to be forgetting that the x-com name is not worth Jack at this point...
First, 3/5 games were good. Or 2 were good and 1 was OK depending on your opinion of Apocalypse. It was also Microprose' baby in the first place so if they wanted to run it into the ground while filling the monthly reports with slams on Microsoft, they're free to do so, it doesn't change that they did something awesome. I'd say the same for 2K but this license just didn't belong to them in the first place and there's no reason for the name except as a crutch made of nostalgia.theonecookie said:...what with only one good game out of five to its name so why do you people act like this is new and that you have been betrayed just now because interceptor and avenger would like a word with you