lol isn't the punctuation we need, it's the punctuation we deserve.
Twitch removes famous emote
- Thread starter CriticalGaming
- Start date
Just check back to what I said and see no-one calling it out and some even happily on about taking said peoples money etc.
Yeh no it's not a logical fallacy. It's a clear example of people happily going along with some-one being called a Nazi just because they don't like them.
If you'd like to try and claim it's a fallacy then the onus is on you to explain how not just throw out the claim hoping it sticks.
Remember? I've met more than handful of English people who still haven't really let that one go.
Citation was given. What was it you said before?
Strange how you're banking on that here.
It’s a whole bunch of nut picking. Pretending one instance is representative of every instance
1. You pretend that one instance of overzealousness proves it’s always overzealousness. Eg. Pretending in the article that when someone said ‘white Supremacist sign’you thought they made it up
2. You pretend that everyone remotely like those that fell for the okay symbol grift act exactly like that. Which is all levels of irony
3. You pretended that we were nut picking. Eg. In the article you pretend that the ‘white Supremacist sign’ was by itself and not provided with additional evidence. This additional evidence might not think that reaches your level of evidence. That’s cool. It does for other people.
Did you ever wonder why this whole incident didn’t work? I get it, you’re conservative. You don’t get called a genocidal slave owner just because you think Medicare 4 All is a good thing. You can pretend stuff like this doesn’t exist. It does. You can pretend it doesn’t exist all you want, I see otherwise
Now, I personally don’t want to fall for the fallacy fallacy. I would definitely say that this overzealousness can happen. Definitely anytime signs are pointed out independent of any other evidence should be questioned, I just don’t think it happens every time, like you do
It's okay, you can admit you don't know what a citation is, or how to provide one.
oh I provided one. It wasn't a very specific one but one was provided.
So is the new plan to not actually try to back up any of your claims so far and just go with whataboutism?
1. The absence of people calling it out speaks so much lol especially given the precedent here. Hell isn't it funny I pointed it out and even no no-one is turning to say "yeh no they're not Nazis". Funny how that works isn't it?
2. See (1)
3. This is the twitch thread not the Rittenhouse thread try to keep up.
Also thanks for telling me what my positions are rather than trying to find them out. I presume you'd also like me to put on this large straw covered outfit you sent to me too?
Still a whole lotta people happy to throw some-one who very much hasn't been a Trump facilitator under the buss with everyone else it seems.
No-one willing to actually say they're not a Nazi? No-one?
No-one willing to actually say they're not a Nazi? No-one?
Citation needed.
Your entire argument amounts to "People aren't paying attention to me, so I win and get to project whatever I like onto that!"
The simple answer is just that people aren't paying attention to you and have no interest in whatever it is you're trying to peddle.
For someone that nobody is paying attention to, you sure are spending a lot of time arguing with him.
1) You are
2) You are others often are and are more than willing to call me out on the smallest possible things I'd have thought a massive issue like what I did would have had one of you say something lol
I'm bored and it's fun to watch you not understand how citations work.
Even then you'll note I have no interest in engaging with your hyperbole. Only in pointing out that people aren't engaging because they don't care what you say.
I volunteered to be the special envoy who stayed on to communicate that, because I hate myself or something.
No I said I deliberately pointed to some-one who wasn't a even a some pro Trump politician just a republican and presented them as a Nazi and no-one questioned it. No-one went "Yeh no they're not" which shows how loosely the term is being thrown round.
What I said was a valid citation, just not a very good quality one lol
But hey still waiting for those quotes I challenged you to present. Dropped that line of argument real quick didn't you?
Funny because they and you seem to care so much in other cases.