summerof2010 said:
No, it really isn't. The flippant attitude of the public is EXACTLY what should be being looked for. People DON'T CARE about census's - which makes them not only a waste of money - but a true denotation of what public attitude is.
This really sums it up. As a devoted reader of Private Eye, and someone who furthermore keeps his eye on his local government and their screw-ups (like somehow managing to have
less grit in a
worse winter, thus making the main road of our county capital almost lethal to traverse), I know darned well that election promises are not being kept, privacy is being invaded, often for no good reason, and that the religious part of the census has little to no effect on policy whatsoever.
I also agree that if the government are receiving flippant replies, they should note that as a symptom of a deeper problem within our political system... that nobody feels enfranchised, that their opinions do not count. Good example, our local "New New Deal". According to the DWP, there have been several complaints made as to the efficiency of this programme and its staff as opposed to the older system put in place, and the DWP of our area has noted grave concerns about the efficiency and general use of the programme as it is now. Our local council has, in their "infinite" (for a given value of infinite... 0) wisdom, decided to ignore all of this.
I'm going to be filling the census info accurately myself (although I am of a minority belief), but I see major problems with the religious section of this census (which is, thankfully, mostly pages and pages of "Tell us the same things about the other people with you as with yourself"), which puts all christian denominations (with differing practices and focii of beliefs) as "Christian", and, overall, shows a half-baked approach (nothing in it about voluntary employment, just "job", for example). As such, I have no problem with people putting "Jedi".