you think that because we are capable of prioritising real, tangible, important issues over jokes that we have no sense of humour?Partezan said:Guess atheists are the new catholics when it comes to having no sense of humor... oh wait, I forgot about communism
and when did i say it was, if at all?Haakong said:If a number on a paper is considered a "real, tangible, important issue" in your book, your life is too goodConor147 said:you think that because we are capable of prioritising real, tangible, important issues over jokes that we have no sense of humour?Partezan said:Guess atheists are the new catholics when it comes to having no sense of humor... oh wait, I forgot about communism
do you not see how retarded that is?
every atheist that sees "jedi" in the census, laughs for a second. but then they realize that had all those people put "no religion", instead, the world would be a better place.
As an idea, religious belief displays quite a few similarities to the behaviour of cancerous cells.wildcard9 said:...and you won't get anywhere by comparing religion to a deadly disease. As a non-practicing Christian I firmly believe in the Trinity and Jesus as my savior, but I'm not ready to make the commitment just yet. Despite that, I know better than marginalizing or belittling someone else's beliefs because you won't get anywhere doing that. All individuals, religious or not, react to hostility to their beliefs; some better than others.similar.squirrel said:They're right. Taking the piss is funny up to a point, but botching an attempt at furthering secularization is taking it a bit far.
You will not be able to excise the cancer of religion by laughing at it, that's for sure.
Honestly, I think it's a combination of geek culture shock and hostility. Unlike organized religion who have the means and the representation to effectively stand against this kind of bullying, "Jedi" as a religion is a new one and thus an easy target. This so-called secular organization that wants to further the cause of humanity in the name of secularism and atheism aren't altruists, they're bullies, plain and simple.
If football wasn't a religion you might not be so offended when I was Manchester City is inferior to Manchester United.Saelune said:If it wasnt a religion, you might not be so offended by my view.arithine said:[Le Snip}
Atheism is not a set of beliefs, but a lack of a belief in a single proposition, thus it can not be described as a religion.
TLDR:
Feel free to call yourself what you want, it's your right, but don't call atheism a religion.
you dont seem to know what atheism is. atheism is a position on a claim. specifically, the claim that a god exists. the position is of disbelief, or rejection.Darius Brogan said:I hope nobody takes this comment the wrong way... but to me, putting 'Jedi' in the religious box, is just as laughable as putting in any other religion.
Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not Atheist. I'm not stupid enough to believe that everything in existence just 'poofed here' from nothingness, but the belief system of most religions makes me want to giggle hysterically.
Seriously, half the religions on Earth follow the same style of Mono-theism, or one God, and the other half follow Poly-theism, or many Gods.
Yes each has it's differences in belief structure, but there are only TWO religions on Earth: Mono and Poly-theism.
The comical variety in religions is what makes me say that being 'Jedi' is just as real as being Christian, or Muslim, or Jewish, or Pagan, or whatever the hell other religion you believe in.
There is no point in trying to tell who is a devout believer anyways. In my nineteen short years, I've already come across hundreds of 'religious' people who are only claiming to be religious to comfort themselves in the event that heaven or hell, or whatever they're called, are real. That's not worship, that's just using a pre-established system to your apparent advantage.
So if you want to put Jedi, or any other hokey religion in the box instead of those listed, go right ahead, because half the 'religious' population are using 'real' religions as a joke anyways.
Yeah, but that is the entire point. They're not complaining about Christianity because they know it is a real religion that is actually practised. Jediism is unlike Christianity in the sense that very few people who claim to be one, actually practise it or believe in it. It IS a joke based on a film franchise, and people only started putting it on forms when prompted to by stand-up comedians. Most of that 400,000 person demographic are pretending to be religious for a laugh. This is misleading the census, which will skewer the statistics, and in turn, have repercussions when the government want to refer to it whilst making changes in any given area. It is the same as lying about your age, or your ethnicity.ysqure3 said:It's ridiculous to say that people shouldn't self-identify as a particular religion unless they reach some standard of devoutness. It seems almost reasonable when we apply it to stuff that seems like a joke like the Church of Jediism, but if we apply it to a more privileged religion like Christianity, it gets ugly. People wouldn't accept being told that they can't identify as Christian unless they can show that they REALLY, TRULY BELIEVE, instead of just like to go to church on weekends. It would be offensive if a private organization ran a campaign like that; it would be a significant step toward religious hegemony if the actual government decided to require a standard of devoutness for census responses.
Because knee-jerk reactions against "uptight atheists" are in fashion.coolerthanice21 said:Seriously, their not saying that no one should believe in Jediism. Their saying that LYING on a census form gives the government inaccurate information that they base decisions off of. Why are so many people not understanding that?!
i suppose you think not collecting stamps is a hobby.Saelune said:If it wasnt a religion, you might not be so offended by my view.arithine said:[Le Snip}
Atheism is not a set of beliefs, but a lack of a belief in a single proposition, thus it can not be described as a religion.
TLDR:
Feel free to call yourself what you want, it's your right, but don't call atheism a religion.
Well a reasonable politician would differentiate with Jedi and more orthodox religions. But if someone wants to game the statistics, they only have to say "I recent survey showed that 40,000 more people in this community have found a religion". Thus, they have compelling ammo, by not mentioning these 40,000 put jedi. Also, it means that they can say "look how few athiests there are! There are fewer athiests than people claiming to be jedi!", again ignoring the fact that many of those jedi would be otherwise non-religious.WrongSprite said:/facepalmChoppaduel said:/facepalmWrongSprite said:Why do they even need to know? They have no reason to care.
I'm still fucking putting Jedi.
read the article again, also read this:
"The data gathered is used to inform government policy, and was used by the last government to justify funding of religious community bodies over secular ones. For example, 2001 census data has been used repeatedly to justify an increase in the number of state maintained faith schools and the increasing level of government money spent on faith organisations.
By ticking 'No Religion', you will ensure that the Government receives an unambiguous message about the number of non-religious people in the UK. Any other response may be manipulated into a response in favour of religion and publically funded religious organisations."
source: http://www.yourenotajedi.com/
As I said to the other guy, the government, believe it or not, are actually intelligent enough to work out that people who put Jedi aren't particularly religious. They would not seriously point at the Jedi community as a reason to build religious places.
Nothing fishy at all. If you call yourself a jedi as a joke, you are basically depriving the census of useful information as to what religion you really are. It is harder for the government to make calls regarding faith schooling or churches when many of the people surveyed give improper answers. As many of these people who call themselves jedi aren't committed to a real religioun (and so should put "non-religious", if that is the case).Witty Name Here said:There's something fishy about this, I don't really see much harm in checking "Jedi" as a religion, if anything I think that this might be some weird attempt to make the Atheist/Non Religious population in the U.K. look bigger.