I wouldn't agree with a mass cull of the mentally and physically disabled, but damn, if you can see in the womb, long before birth is anywhere near, that your future child is going to never experience life in a normal, healthy way, by which I mean, having the independence to look after yourself, then I'd suggest let them go. Certainly they can express happiness and even love, but surely, given the choice wouldn't anyone wish their child was fit and healthy?
I'm afraid that I can never believe the words 'We'd not change a thing about our child', when he or she is unable to feed itself or use the bathroom unaided. If you're saying that it's not so different to saying 'We're happy our child is disabled'. Of course it's only my view, but I believe they mean 'We're happy to have a child, and we'll deal with the problems.'
Just go for the termination and try again, or adopt. Save yourself and your future child decades of incredibly hard work for no reason. IF you already have a disabled person in your family, of course you love them and I'd not expect anything to change, but when given the choice between disabled or not, I can't imagine choosing to inflict that on an unborn child.
Also, worldwide, no-one gets to give birth to more than one child in their home country while there's kids in orphanages, you want a child, go get one. If you're that desperate for the pain of childbirth, get to the orphanage, show an abandoned child a lifetime of love, and I'll give you a free kick in the clacker as some compensation for not going thru childbirth again.
Welfare, I'm more than happy to see a sizable chunk of my taxes go to protecting the weaker members of society, and if you're against this, you're the very reason we need it.
At present fraud on disability allowance is estimated at 0.5%, of a total cost of DLA to the UK of 2 billion. By my maths, that's 100 million in fraud (less than is lost to human error), yet the government are paying ATOS the same 100 million each year to test those least able to defend themselves, and failing in 70% of cases, their rejections being overturned.
Putting all that aside, spending 100 million to save part of 100 million is fucking retarded.
I'll forever happily pay a little extra tax to allow cheats to live frugally on welfare if it means we're not fucking over the weakest people.
The new rules on Tax on charitable donations, while I'm against it because I don't believe for a moment George Osbourne is doing it for any reason than it will lead to the deaths of sick kids and the elderly and infirm, and that makes him visibly tumescent, I'd be for it from someone who was looking to cut the loopholes allowing churches and private schools to register as charities.
Lastly, I believe socialism is a good thing, and I believe mild socialism is not actually the exact same thing as extremist communism.
Oh, and I think Michael McIntyre AND Stewart Lee are funny.