Oh wow, they avoided doing a BioShock 2 and instead focused on making the core game worth playing. That's pretty awesome; I had a feeling Bioware wouldn't let down the players who appreciated Mass Effect for what it is.
Well the multiplayer i would have been interested in was simply co-op campaign, ut yeah ifit's down to half assed MP or a great finaly i'm with ya.RatRace123 said:Oh thank god, that was actually something I was worried about.
Good to see they're pouring all their Mass Effect resources into making a kick ass single player game.
THANK YOU.CosmicCommander said:Allow me to clarify... Why are they starting with Earth? Why does it seem to be their priority target? It's a very bad place to start, considering it's at the end of the Mass Relay system, and it isn't the head of galactic Government. Wouldn't it make far more sense to go with the original plan of destroying all infrastructure and communication in the Galaxy by wiping out the Citadel. Then everyone will be scrambled, unorganized, and then they can attack Earth with ease.MiracleOfSound said:1. They're not.
The Reapers wipe out all civilised worlds when they come for their little visits.
No it doesn't. Think of it... seeing as Earth is at the end of the line in the Mass Relay system, they'll have their backs against the wall if the other races turn up. And the fact that destroying a single planet will not screw things up at all for the rest of the Galaxy. You see, the Reapers rely on blitzkrieg; they can instantly wipe out foes, but they can't wage any defensive battles with ease. As omnipotent beings of logic, obviously they should realise that a quick attack on the infrastructure and military is their best bet, instead of waging a static war which leaves them easy targets.2. It makes sense they target Earth first...
The idea that they'd stupidly negate the plan that has worked dramatically well for the past several million years just for a hunt on a single human, by doing a static attack on one planet... Is ridiculous.
This (thd first part). The finality is too important for it to get muddled up with multiplaya. I'll look forward to a spin off game.Veret said:I don't object to multiplayer in this series, but I certainly don't want it anywhere near the main trilogy. Here's hoping somebody who actually works for Bioware comes out and confirms this story soon.
Oh, and the moderator in question (Pacifien) is a she. Not that it matters, but that was bugging me. Fix please?
I demand a clear hat! Clear is a color, right?RollForInitiative said:A writer I once worked with said something to the effect of: "You could give the players a hat that will create their perfect RPG experience for them and they would ***** about the color of the hat."MiracleOfSound said:Sometimes I think people just want a reason to *****.
Maybe Bioware are a little bit racist. Thw hole trailer did seem to give the feel "Humans first".CosmicCommander said:I'll give the game kudos to exploring aliens, but I'm snapping at it for making them feel second to humanity.
I feel like they should go for it. Bioware has the resources to take risks and this is a win win scenario. If it turns out terrible who cares, we're only there for the single player.this isnt my name said:I agree for several reasons. I will wait until they announced it, I think people will actually be suprised, lol.Chunko said:20$ says that there actually is going to be multiplayer.