Well, at least we know he's only a cheating sleeze at this point, instead of a... whatever the hell the term is for randomly inventing someone to garner sympathy...The_root_of_all_evil said:There's evidence that he has a female partner - but it's a different family name. More than that, I wouldn't like to say.Starke said:If they exist at all. There's apparently a pretty decent argument being made that the wife and child don't actually exist, and never did in any way shape or form until after this mess started.
The theft charge could be tricky, given the way ownership on the internet works. The extortion one? That's much easier to make.Avatar Roku said:It goes past a business dispute. He is holding their accounts hostage. That is theft. He is refusing to return them unless his conditions are met. That is extortion. It's pretty cut-and-dried.Sixcess said:Has he?Nergy said:I get the feeling that you haven't read the appropriate articles, because he has gone above and beyond being a "Jerk, a loudmouth, a thug" at this point.
I hope you're not referring the extortion thing, because the only place the word "extortion" was used was in the title of this news article. What I see over at Reddit is an acrimonious business dispute being dragged out into the public eye.
The Escapist forums are not a court of law.
Reddit is not a court of law.
The Internet is not a court of law.
EDIT: The extortion charge would be pretty cut and dried. He contacts a business, demands money from them or he'll damage their reputation, or, whatever. That's extortion.