Wow, some of the earlier comments I read are some "Saw" movie level shit! Getting tossed in prison and fucked with sandpaper condoms and shivs? The judge should just order a wii-mote shoved up the assailant's butt and call it a day.
You fucked up the images. Trolling fail.BanMe05 said:trollsnip
To ALL of your posts in this thread:Fawxy said:epic snip
Eye for an eye? Try both eyes, all 4 limbs, and the head! Seriously though, eye for an eye works perfectly for this case. The man should have his ass kicked and a Wii-mote shoved up his butt. Simple and reciprocal justice!TheRightToArmBears said:Man, that's really pretty grim, I hope he goes a way for a long, long time. It's also a little depressing to see some people still hold that ridiculous 'eye for an eye' notion.
The fact of the matter is, he repeated the crime when NO LONGER intoxicated. If this were Texas, he'd burn (or be gassed, I suppose) for what he did. While I certainly don't agree with a number of things Texans do or believe in, death penalty to child molesters is one of the few things I do agree with. Either that, or life imprisonment with no change of parole.Dr. wonderful said:Yes, because they're goinh to die.Fawxy said:Not done enough. That "chance of parole" thing you mentioned is fucked. The defense thinks they get justice because they see that 25-27 years and think he'll be removed from society, meanwhile he gets out after 7-10 years for "good behavior" and is right back on the streets ready to hurt another child. Fuck that.Dr. wonderful said:....Wow, good speech.Fawxy said:Oh really? Any more stupid and wrong than the fact that he raped a child?Dr. wonderful said:No. That is both stupid and wrong.dagens24 said:Good. I hope he gets raped with a shiv in prison; a little ironic justice.
He should just be taken to jail. That's it.
I said it in the other thread, and I'll say it here;
This fucker deserves nothing better than death. Anyone willing to brutally violate the basic human rights of a CHILD has no place in society and deserves to be eliminated.
Fuck him, fuck all the ******s who will come to this thread to defend him/say the incident is funny, and fuck the U.S. legal system for the fact that this guy will get off with minimal punishment.
No, I lied it was stupid. He's maybe going to get the same number of years as a guy raping a woman...while the male was drunk.
So, distract the age to 12 and 's looking at 25-27 years with a chance of parole. Oh and he have to register as a sex offender which IS instant death. Because no one going to work with him, let him live anywhere.
He's done for.
Pedophiles who get the death penalty have a 0% rate of recidivism, meaning there is absolutely no chance of them harming again. That's a fucking good number in my book.
And that an excellent way to solve our problems. Kill people who commited crimes while intoxcitaed.
fucking Brillant.
So pedophilia, a serious mental condition of which the person suffering from it has no choice in the matter, should be punished by death. We should kill homosexuals, retards and those sort of people, like that paragon of justice did. We all know he was the good guy.Fawxy said:Not done enough. That "chance of parole" thing you mentioned is fucked. The defense thinks they get justice because they see that 25-27 years and think he'll be removed from society, meanwhile he gets out after 7-10 years for "good behavior" and is right back on the streets ready to hurt another child. Fuck that.Dr. wonderful said:....Wow, good speech.Fawxy said:Oh really? Any more stupid and wrong than the fact that he raped a child?Dr. wonderful said:No. That is both stupid and wrong.dagens24 said:Good. I hope he gets raped with a shiv in prison; a little ironic justice.
He should just be taken to jail. That's it.
I said it in the other thread, and I'll say it here;
This fucker deserves nothing better than death. Anyone willing to brutally violate the basic human rights of a CHILD has no place in society and deserves to be eliminated.
Fuck him, fuck all the ******s who will come to this thread to defend him/say the incident is funny, and fuck the U.S. legal system for the fact that this guy will get off with minimal punishment.
No, I lied it was stupid. He's maybe going to get the same number of years as a guy raping a woman...while the male was drunk.
So, distract the age to 12 and 's looking at 25-27 years with a chance of parole. Oh and he have to register as a sex offender which IS instant death. Because no one going to work with him, let him live anywhere.
He's done for.
Pedophiles who get the death penalty have a 0% rate of recidivism, meaning there is absolutely no chance of them harming again. That's a fucking good number in my book.
I disagree.Robert Sanders said:Eye for an eye? Try both eyes, all 4 limbs, and the head! Seriously though, eye for an eye works perfectly for this case. The man should have his ass kicked and a Wii-mote shoved up his butt. Simple and reciprocal justice!TheRightToArmBears said:Man, that's really pretty grim, I hope he goes a way for a long, long time. It's also a little depressing to see some people still hold that ridiculous 'eye for an eye' notion.
You've really never heard these before? They're not that uncommon.Fawxy said:Allow me a minute to express total feelings of shock and awe towards arguments that I've obviously never heard before...
Yeah, I'm done.
You're right, you never actually said it should be a spectator sport, but it is, and by being content with the system as it is you are endorsing it, whether you directly say so or not.Bias apparent from the start, I like it. Hey, I can't criticize since I'm obviously biased too, but when exactly did I say executions should be a spectator sport? I never said that? Huh.
Also, I don't view it as "murdering someone in cold blood", I view it as removing a worthless and harmful member from society in the most efficient manner possible.
What I am getting at is "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." Mercy is also a virtue of justice, not just punishment. I'm not against criminals being punished, but I am against them being executed. If a criminal starts a firefight with police rather than give himself up and gets killed as a result I will not mourn his loss. He was given a chance and he blew it, the police acted in self defense and I have no problem with that. But I can have no respect for anyone who will take someone alive, only to kill them when they are completely at their mercy. I don't care what they've done, to do that to them is deplorable.Not sure what you're getting at here, seeing as the justice system doesn't go around breaking and entering, raping, murdering, etc. the populace, so I do think they have more credibility than the people who do and should rightly punish those who commit these acts.
Yes, people die. I'm aware of that. I also think that anyone worth their salt sees that statement as an inevitability to be limited to the absolute minimum, not an excuse to justify deaths that aren't necessary. I think you're incorrectly making out that I would just let all these people walk free. I never insinuated such. These people can go to prison and can only come out again once they've learned the value of being a law abiding citizen, and if they never do, then they can rot there for all I care. So your '1000 dangerous criminals walking free' imagery is worthless. However, if we are going to talk in hypotheticals here, the yes. I would rather 1000 guilty men walked free if that's what it took to live in a country that never once executed an innocent. Criminals who walked free can always be found again if they commit another crime or if new evidence comes to light. An innocent man who was executed cannot be brought back to life, so in my opinion that is worse.We live in a shit world. People die. If one innocent individual dies for every 1000 criminals no longer pose a threat to society, it's the best that can be done. It's a tragedy, yes, but at the same time would you have to decide whether the havoc wreaked by 1000 walked criminals is worth it.
While I disagree with your previous statements, this is the only one that I am completely unable to understand. Honestly, how can you say that? It's not a question of whether or not they 'deserve it' (however, I would also argue that anyone, no matter what they have done or why, deserves at least 1 more chance to atone. Working out that what they did was wrong for themselves will make a thousand times more difference than all the knee-jerk punishments from on high that you could give them) It's a question of whether your justice system has the inner strength and integrity to set a good example for its people. Respect works both ways. People need to respect the law, but no-one will respect anything that rules them with an iron fist.Deaf ears from me. I don't believe they deserve to be reformed. Anyone who violates the human rights of another individual deserves none of their own.
Maybe they would, but that doesn't mean the family of the accused deserve to suffer when they have done no wrong either. There is a reason families of victims can't sit on jury's or in the judges chair you know. As much as I may have sympathy for them, they cannot have any kind of unbiased perspective, and just because they want one punishment or another to befall this person doesn't mean that their word is law. Just because they want revenge at the time doesn't necessarily mean that it will give them what they hope it will, and it certainly doesn't mean we should give it to them just because it's what they want.You sure about that? You think it doesn't hurt the millions of individuals who see their loved ones' murderer/rapist walk free? You don't think these families would rather see the sick fucker dead, unable to harm another person ever again?
Richardplex said:So pedophilia, a serious mental condition of which the person suffering from it has no choice in the matter, should be punished by death. We should kill homosexuals, retards and those sort of people, like that paragon of justice did. We all know he was the good guy.Fawxy said:Not done enough. That "chance of parole" thing you mentioned is fucked. The defense thinks they get justice because they see that 25-27 years and think he'll be removed from society, meanwhile he gets out after 7-10 years for "good behavior" and is right back on the streets ready to hurt another child. Fuck that.Dr. wonderful said:....Wow, good speech.Fawxy said:Oh really? Any more stupid and wrong than the fact that he raped a child?Dr. wonderful said:No. That is both stupid and wrong.dagens24 said:Good. I hope he gets raped with a shiv in prison; a little ironic justice.
He should just be taken to jail. That's it.
I said it in the other thread, and I'll say it here;
This fucker deserves nothing better than death. Anyone willing to brutally violate the basic human rights of a CHILD has no place in society and deserves to be eliminated.
Fuck him, fuck all the ******s who will come to this thread to defend him/say the incident is funny, and fuck the U.S. legal system for the fact that this guy will get off with minimal punishment.
No, I lied it was stupid. He's maybe going to get the same number of years as a guy raping a woman...while the male was drunk.
So, distract the age to 12 and 's looking at 25-27 years with a chance of parole. Oh and he have to register as a sex offender which IS instant death. Because no one going to work with him, let him live anywhere.
He's done for.
Pedophiles who get the death penalty have a 0% rate of recidivism, meaning there is absolutely no chance of them harming again. That's a fucking good number in my book.
Man needs THERAPY, not prison.
And I see that pretentious little comment of yours, get off your high horse. Hitler was also trying to sort out the shit that Europe put his country into, he was also fighting for his justice. He took it to places that no-one has the right to go, and on a mass level. That's why he's evil, because he killed them, not because of the reasons he did it. And that's why people are comparing you to hitler, because YOU'RE also saying that mentally challenged people deserve to die and don't deserve help, because you have judged them unworthy, you who knows nothing about what psychological struggles these people have, not only from themselves but from the society that has labelled them evil for what they were born with. Yes, the guy should be punished for beating the child, and yes, he should be punished for raping the child, but the stuff you seem to believe, I honestly believe you're worse than him. Because you've chosen your twisted ideology.
I'm not saying that they are innocent, just that they need therapy, not the whole being killed off or being-raped-in-prison-to-see-how-they-like-it mentality. But people never think of them as people with helpable problems, just as evil monsters. And as you said, quite a lot are monsters, but it doesn't mean they don't deserve help. That is what I'm saying. I never meant to absolve any crimes they commit.Linda Woodbury said:As the survivor of a sexual abuse at age 5 your comment is revolting.
Ask any licensed criminal psychologist and they will tell what I am telling you.
Rapists choose victims who are vulnerable and can be easily controlled.
[I for example have Autism]
They use sex as a weapon to control their victims.
The rapists who do get sexual thrills from raping, it is not the sex itself that gets their thrills from.
It is about having a life in your hands and hurting them.
Thus a rapist controls you forever in their sick little minds because everything you do from then on has been shaped by them.
A rapist chooses his victims so they are the least likely to tell and get caught.
Rape is very under reported because the victim is lives in fear of that person.
Rapists choose their victims and they choose to be rapists.
The average rapist recommits his crime with in 5 years of prison release.
A friend of mine's daughter was violently raped and the evidence against the accused was overwhelming.
This man had a previous conviction for robbery and despite living next door to the victim they let this jerk out on bail.
When he was out on bail he had his friends and family make death threats against his victim.
It was so overwhelming she had to move at her own expense.
Yet this is not uncommon for victims to go through.
This is also the many victims of rape do not press charges.
My attacker threatened to kill all my family if my mom pressed charges.
Whoops, comment below I meant to quote
This may have already been said, but... how in the HELL do you sleep through that? I extremely doubt anyone would be all that quiet if they were sexually assaulted by a bloody Wiimote, so the idea that the boy's parents slept through it strikes me as a little bloody bizarre.Earnest Cavalli said:The parents of the boy who was having the sleepover were asleep upstairs, he said.