Utah Man Jailed For Alleged Wiimote Rape

Robert Sanders

New member
Jul 9, 2011
88
0
0
Wow, some of the earlier comments I read are some "Saw" movie level shit! Getting tossed in prison and fucked with sandpaper condoms and shivs? The judge should just order a wii-mote shoved up the assailant's butt and call it a day.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Gentlemen / Ladies, if I could just have your attention for a moment, please.

This is not our world.

This is the world of a sick pervert that we should take no interest in. His crime is a case for the courts, and they are the poor people who have to deal with this horrifying ordeal.

It is not our crime.

It has nothing to do with us.

We should simply condemn the act of barbarism that has occurred and move on while the law deals with him, and the child's friends look after the victim.

We should not let this one act taint our perceptions. It's a random freak occurrence and will be dealt with accordingly.

Thank you for your time.

Root.
 

Robert Sanders

New member
Jul 9, 2011
88
0
0
TheRightToArmBears said:
Man, that's really pretty grim, I hope he goes a way for a long, long time. It's also a little depressing to see some people still hold that ridiculous 'eye for an eye' notion.
Eye for an eye? Try both eyes, all 4 limbs, and the head! Seriously though, eye for an eye works perfectly for this case. The man should have his ass kicked and a Wii-mote shoved up his butt. Simple and reciprocal justice!
 

Forktongue

New member
May 19, 2009
68
0
0
So if Nicholas Parry got drunk and assaulted a child, why is Nicholas Perry being held by authorities?

Seriously though, this is just sickening. From the reports I get the feeling that this guy is going to try and blame the alcohol, because we all know that booze turns wholesome people into violent rapists. Hopefully the "sorry I had one too many" defense won't earn him less jail time/rehab.
 

Alar

The Stormbringer
Dec 1, 2009
1,356
0
0
Dr. wonderful said:
Fawxy said:
Dr. wonderful said:
Fawxy said:
Dr. wonderful said:
dagens24 said:
Good. I hope he gets raped with a shiv in prison; a little ironic justice.
No. That is both stupid and wrong.

He should just be taken to jail. That's it.
Oh really? Any more stupid and wrong than the fact that he raped a child?

I said it in the other thread, and I'll say it here;

This fucker deserves nothing better than death. Anyone willing to brutally violate the basic human rights of a CHILD has no place in society and deserves to be eliminated.

Fuck him, fuck all the ******s who will come to this thread to defend him/say the incident is funny, and fuck the U.S. legal system for the fact that this guy will get off with minimal punishment.
....Wow, good speech.

No, I lied it was stupid. He's maybe going to get the same number of years as a guy raping a woman...while the male was drunk.

So, distract the age to 12 and 's looking at 25-27 years with a chance of parole. Oh and he have to register as a sex offender which IS instant death. Because no one going to work with him, let him live anywhere.

He's done for.
Not done enough. That "chance of parole" thing you mentioned is fucked. The defense thinks they get justice because they see that 25-27 years and think he'll be removed from society, meanwhile he gets out after 7-10 years for "good behavior" and is right back on the streets ready to hurt another child. Fuck that.

Pedophiles who get the death penalty have a 0% rate of recidivism, meaning there is absolutely no chance of them harming again. That's a fucking good number in my book.
Yes, because they're goinh to die.

And that an excellent way to solve our problems. Kill people who commited crimes while intoxcitaed.

fucking Brillant.
The fact of the matter is, he repeated the crime when NO LONGER intoxicated. If this were Texas, he'd burn (or be gassed, I suppose) for what he did. While I certainly don't agree with a number of things Texans do or believe in, death penalty to child molesters is one of the few things I do agree with. Either that, or life imprisonment with no change of parole.
 

SnakeoilSage

New member
Sep 20, 2011
1,211
0
0
Let's hope he enjoys the irony when he's spending quality time with the Sisters in Shawshank.
 

Richardplex

New member
Jun 22, 2011
1,731
0
0
Fawxy said:
Dr. wonderful said:
Fawxy said:
Dr. wonderful said:
dagens24 said:
Good. I hope he gets raped with a shiv in prison; a little ironic justice.
No. That is both stupid and wrong.

He should just be taken to jail. That's it.
Oh really? Any more stupid and wrong than the fact that he raped a child?

I said it in the other thread, and I'll say it here;

This fucker deserves nothing better than death. Anyone willing to brutally violate the basic human rights of a CHILD has no place in society and deserves to be eliminated.

Fuck him, fuck all the ******s who will come to this thread to defend him/say the incident is funny, and fuck the U.S. legal system for the fact that this guy will get off with minimal punishment.
....Wow, good speech.

No, I lied it was stupid. He's maybe going to get the same number of years as a guy raping a woman...while the male was drunk.

So, distract the age to 12 and 's looking at 25-27 years with a chance of parole. Oh and he have to register as a sex offender which IS instant death. Because no one going to work with him, let him live anywhere.

He's done for.
Not done enough. That "chance of parole" thing you mentioned is fucked. The defense thinks they get justice because they see that 25-27 years and think he'll be removed from society, meanwhile he gets out after 7-10 years for "good behavior" and is right back on the streets ready to hurt another child. Fuck that.

Pedophiles who get the death penalty have a 0% rate of recidivism, meaning there is absolutely no chance of them harming again. That's a fucking good number in my book.
So pedophilia, a serious mental condition of which the person suffering from it has no choice in the matter, should be punished by death. We should kill homosexuals, retards and those sort of people, like that paragon of justice did. We all know he was the good guy.

Man needs THERAPY, not prison.

Edit: [this paragraph cut for being completely unnecessary]
 

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,674
0
0
Robert Sanders said:
TheRightToArmBears said:
Man, that's really pretty grim, I hope he goes a way for a long, long time. It's also a little depressing to see some people still hold that ridiculous 'eye for an eye' notion.
Eye for an eye? Try both eyes, all 4 limbs, and the head! Seriously though, eye for an eye works perfectly for this case. The man should have his ass kicked and a Wii-mote shoved up his butt. Simple and reciprocal justice!
I disagree.

Call me a liberal douche, but I'm more for rehabilitation. Raping someone out or revenge doesn't really do that.
 

NinjaDeathSlap

Leaf on the wind
Feb 20, 2011
4,474
0
0
Fawxy said:
Allow me a minute to express total feelings of shock and awe towards arguments that I've obviously never heard before...

Yeah, I'm done.
You've really never heard these before? They're not that uncommon.

Bias apparent from the start, I like it. Hey, I can't criticize since I'm obviously biased too, but when exactly did I say executions should be a spectator sport? I never said that? Huh.

Also, I don't view it as "murdering someone in cold blood", I view it as removing a worthless and harmful member from society in the most efficient manner possible.
You're right, you never actually said it should be a spectator sport, but it is, and by being content with the system as it is you are endorsing it, whether you directly say so or not.

Also, it is in cold blood. You are making the conscious decision to kill them and they are unarmed and unable to resist in any way. That is the very definition of 'in cold blood'.

Not sure what you're getting at here, seeing as the justice system doesn't go around breaking and entering, raping, murdering, etc. the populace, so I do think they have more credibility than the people who do and should rightly punish those who commit these acts.
What I am getting at is "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." Mercy is also a virtue of justice, not just punishment. I'm not against criminals being punished, but I am against them being executed. If a criminal starts a firefight with police rather than give himself up and gets killed as a result I will not mourn his loss. He was given a chance and he blew it, the police acted in self defense and I have no problem with that. But I can have no respect for anyone who will take someone alive, only to kill them when they are completely at their mercy. I don't care what they've done, to do that to them is deplorable.

Besides, take a second to think about just how well the current system works. The USA executes criminals by the truckload almost every day, and yet it has never stopped people from committing crimes they know full well before hand can earn them the death penalty. Often, it is the states that execute the most people that actually have the worst figures for serious crimes. Often, countries who used to have capital punishment but have since abolished it do not do so because it suddenly appalls them from a moral standpoint. They abolish it when they realise that it doesn't actually work.

We live in a shit world. People die. If one innocent individual dies for every 1000 criminals no longer pose a threat to society, it's the best that can be done. It's a tragedy, yes, but at the same time would you have to decide whether the havoc wreaked by 1000 walked criminals is worth it.
Yes, people die. I'm aware of that. I also think that anyone worth their salt sees that statement as an inevitability to be limited to the absolute minimum, not an excuse to justify deaths that aren't necessary. I think you're incorrectly making out that I would just let all these people walk free. I never insinuated such. These people can go to prison and can only come out again once they've learned the value of being a law abiding citizen, and if they never do, then they can rot there for all I care. So your '1000 dangerous criminals walking free' imagery is worthless. However, if we are going to talk in hypotheticals here, the yes. I would rather 1000 guilty men walked free if that's what it took to live in a country that never once executed an innocent. Criminals who walked free can always be found again if they commit another crime or if new evidence comes to light. An innocent man who was executed cannot be brought back to life, so in my opinion that is worse.

Deaf ears from me. I don't believe they deserve to be reformed. Anyone who violates the human rights of another individual deserves none of their own.
While I disagree with your previous statements, this is the only one that I am completely unable to understand. Honestly, how can you say that? It's not a question of whether or not they 'deserve it' (however, I would also argue that anyone, no matter what they have done or why, deserves at least 1 more chance to atone. Working out that what they did was wrong for themselves will make a thousand times more difference than all the knee-jerk punishments from on high that you could give them) It's a question of whether your justice system has the inner strength and integrity to set a good example for its people. Respect works both ways. People need to respect the law, but no-one will respect anything that rules them with an iron fist.

You sure about that? You think it doesn't hurt the millions of individuals who see their loved ones' murderer/rapist walk free? You don't think these families would rather see the sick fucker dead, unable to harm another person ever again?
Maybe they would, but that doesn't mean the family of the accused deserve to suffer when they have done no wrong either. There is a reason families of victims can't sit on jury's or in the judges chair you know. As much as I may have sympathy for them, they cannot have any kind of unbiased perspective, and just because they want one punishment or another to befall this person doesn't mean that their word is law. Just because they want revenge at the time doesn't necessarily mean that it will give them what they hope it will, and it certainly doesn't mean we should give it to them just because it's what they want.
 

Matt225distraction

New member
Apr 11, 2011
15
0
0
I know it's not for me to decide the morality of the situation, or the justified way to punish the man who did this, but if it were up to me, I'd have him put under 'an eye for an eye.'

Those of you who think this is funny, kindly fuck off, because it isn't. The joking about the Wii remotes phallic shape and how Nintendo released 'Wii condoms' can no longer be funny, now that someone has gone around and DONE IT, once while drunk, and then again sober.

Imagine you were the kid, will you? You could never view a Wii remote the same way again. The emotional and physical trauma involved would scar you for life.
Humanity has failed me once again. I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
 

Korihor

Free Thinker
Dec 9, 2010
28
0
0
As the survivor of a sexual abuse at age 5 your comment is revolting.
Ask any licensed criminal psychologist and they will tell what I am telling you.
Rapists choose victims who are vulnerable and can be easily controlled.
[I for example have Autism]
They use sex as a weapon to control their victims.
The rapists who do get sexual thrills from raping, it is not the sex itself that gets their thrills from.
It is about having a life in your hands and hurting them.
Thus a rapist controls you forever in their sick little minds because everything you do from then on has been shaped by them.
A rapist chooses his victims so they are the least likely to tell and get caught.
Rape is very under reported because the victim is lives in fear of that person.
Rapists choose their victims and they choose to be rapists.
The average rapist recommits his crime with in 5 years of prison release.


A friend of mine's daughter was violently raped and the evidence against the accused was overwhelming.
This man had a previous conviction for robbery and despite living next door to the victim they let this jerk out on bail.
When he was out on bail he had his friends and family make death threats against his victim.
It was so overwhelming she had to move at her own expense.
Yet this is not uncommon for victims to go through.
This is also the many victims of rape do not press charges.
My attacker threatened to kill all my family if my mom pressed charges.

Whoops, comment below I meant to quote
 

Korihor

Free Thinker
Dec 9, 2010
28
0
0
Whoops link to above comments.

Richardplex said:
Fawxy said:
Dr. wonderful said:
Fawxy said:
Dr. wonderful said:
dagens24 said:
Good. I hope he gets raped with a shiv in prison; a little ironic justice.
No. That is both stupid and wrong.

He should just be taken to jail. That's it.
Oh really? Any more stupid and wrong than the fact that he raped a child?

I said it in the other thread, and I'll say it here;

This fucker deserves nothing better than death. Anyone willing to brutally violate the basic human rights of a CHILD has no place in society and deserves to be eliminated.

Fuck him, fuck all the ******s who will come to this thread to defend him/say the incident is funny, and fuck the U.S. legal system for the fact that this guy will get off with minimal punishment.
....Wow, good speech.

No, I lied it was stupid. He's maybe going to get the same number of years as a guy raping a woman...while the male was drunk.

So, distract the age to 12 and 's looking at 25-27 years with a chance of parole. Oh and he have to register as a sex offender which IS instant death. Because no one going to work with him, let him live anywhere.

He's done for.
Not done enough. That "chance of parole" thing you mentioned is fucked. The defense thinks they get justice because they see that 25-27 years and think he'll be removed from society, meanwhile he gets out after 7-10 years for "good behavior" and is right back on the streets ready to hurt another child. Fuck that.

Pedophiles who get the death penalty have a 0% rate of recidivism, meaning there is absolutely no chance of them harming again. That's a fucking good number in my book.
So pedophilia, a serious mental condition of which the person suffering from it has no choice in the matter, should be punished by death. We should kill homosexuals, retards and those sort of people, like that paragon of justice did. We all know he was the good guy.

Man needs THERAPY, not prison.

And I see that pretentious little comment of yours, get off your high horse. Hitler was also trying to sort out the shit that Europe put his country into, he was also fighting for his justice. He took it to places that no-one has the right to go, and on a mass level. That's why he's evil, because he killed them, not because of the reasons he did it. And that's why people are comparing you to hitler, because YOU'RE also saying that mentally challenged people deserve to die and don't deserve help, because you have judged them unworthy, you who knows nothing about what psychological struggles these people have, not only from themselves but from the society that has labelled them evil for what they were born with. Yes, the guy should be punished for beating the child, and yes, he should be punished for raping the child, but the stuff you seem to believe, I honestly believe you're worse than him. Because you've chosen your twisted ideology.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
It's okay, he had the handstrap on when doing it, safety first. /end joke.

Yeah that's a BIT of a messed up thing to do, he was drunk and did it...then sobered up and did it. Well, he'll have some more sobering to do in jail.
 

Mullahgrrl

New member
Apr 20, 2008
1,011
0
0
I knew this was going to happen the first time I ever saw a wii control.

Inevitable!
 

Kiwilove

New member
Apr 2, 2011
37
0
0
They've probably charged him with object rape of a child (76-5-402.3). That's 25 to life in Utah. Also, mandatory life imprisonment without parole if he's ever been charged with a sexual offense in the past. Sounds about right to me.
 

Dfskelleton

New member
Apr 6, 2010
2,851
0
0
What made him angry? Actually trying to play the Wii?
Okay, bad joke aside, that's sickening. However, I also don't think he's going to get the death penalty anyways. Put him in prison, which for people like that, pretty much is the death penalty. People in prison probably don't take kindly to child rapists.
 

Richardplex

New member
Jun 22, 2011
1,731
0
0
Linda Woodbury said:
As the survivor of a sexual abuse at age 5 your comment is revolting.
Ask any licensed criminal psychologist and they will tell what I am telling you.
Rapists choose victims who are vulnerable and can be easily controlled.
[I for example have Autism]
They use sex as a weapon to control their victims.
The rapists who do get sexual thrills from raping, it is not the sex itself that gets their thrills from.
It is about having a life in your hands and hurting them.
Thus a rapist controls you forever in their sick little minds because everything you do from then on has been shaped by them.
A rapist chooses his victims so they are the least likely to tell and get caught.
Rape is very under reported because the victim is lives in fear of that person.
Rapists choose their victims and they choose to be rapists.
The average rapist recommits his crime with in 5 years of prison release.


A friend of mine's daughter was violently raped and the evidence against the accused was overwhelming.
This man had a previous conviction for robbery and despite living next door to the victim they let this jerk out on bail.
When he was out on bail he had his friends and family make death threats against his victim.
It was so overwhelming she had to move at her own expense.
Yet this is not uncommon for victims to go through.
This is also the many victims of rape do not press charges.
My attacker threatened to kill all my family if my mom pressed charges.

Whoops, comment below I meant to quote
I'm not saying that they are innocent, just that they need therapy, not the whole being killed off or being-raped-in-prison-to-see-how-they-like-it mentality. But people never think of them as people with helpable problems, just as evil monsters. And as you said, quite a lot are monsters, but it doesn't mean they don't deserve help. That is what I'm saying. I never meant to absolve any crimes they commit.
 

Seotinach

New member
Jun 7, 2010
6
0
0
Earnest Cavalli said:
The parents of the boy who was having the sleepover were asleep upstairs, he said.
This may have already been said, but... how in the HELL do you sleep through that? I extremely doubt anyone would be all that quiet if they were sexually assaulted by a bloody Wiimote, so the idea that the boy's parents slept through it strikes me as a little bloody bizarre.

Disturbing as this story is, that single line makes me slightly hesitant to believe it.