I love how the "sexism is not an issue" squad tries to use false equivalencies and logical fallacies all over the place. And of course, the guys defending sexism need to show their hateboner for Anita Sarkeesian, too.
You realize that her very existance proves that sexism is a massive issue, right? The only reason she even is famous is gamer males acting worse than troglodytes and sending rape and death threats en masse because she was going to make videos criticizing videogames that few people were even going to see. As Jim Sterling pointed out: Misogynist gamers created her popularity. And that's why I support her: The more she makes the sexists froth with foam on their mouths, the better. It proves the point perfectly with every action these guys make
It's a simple fact that female gamers get far, far worse harassment in the gaming community than men do. We've had studies where the only difference between a player was the voice other players heard, and yet the harassment was multitudes higher if players thought they were dealing with a woman. It's so bad that the gaming community is actually *worse* on being sexist than the general population.
And here we have the issue.
This extends to the games made for the community. Sexist games aren't an issue because they make the community sexist, but because a)companies think you're all extremely sexist (which, personally, if I were a guy, would offend me a lot... Of course it doesn't if you're in the camp hating on Miss Sarkeesian) b)they do exclude woman.
Especially b because, as the Anita incident proves, a isn't so far from the truth.
Don't want a) to be true? Maybe stop sending death and rape threats to women you disagree with, and stop blaming her for them, too.
Sexist video games don't *cause* gamer male sexism, but they are proof of it.
By the way: The whiny argument that the enemies in games are usually men is pretty braindead. The reason for that is sexism again: Sexism against women. Women are mostly used as eye candy, so games aren't using women as anything but that. Sexist men also can't handle women as soldiers, so the games obviously won't have many of these.
If you are angry that most military shooters have male enemies, then the solution would be to demand less sexism and more women in general. Because that'd also mean more women you could kill. If gaming wasn't generally so steeped in misogyny, women would be regular enemies just like men would be.
In fact, games with more female characters tend to have more female enemies. So, why are you guys so upset at the notion that games could have more female characters in clothing similar to that the guys wear? Since you want to kill ladies so much, that's what you'd get. Tons of it! And nobody'd care.
Hey, remember World of Warcraft? Lotsa female enemies around. And do people complain? Nope: iN fact, those evil feminists you hate so much tend to like that. Cause it's equal :>