To be honest I think your use of the word "violent" is thoroughly misplaced here, I really don't know why you would use that word unless English wasn't your 1st language.
English is my first language and when I say violent, I do mean violent. A quick temper, although I'm certainly not irrational and petty. Hot tempered. Aggressive. Likes that sort of interaction and bonding. Conviction.scumofsociety said:To be honest I think your use of the word "violent" is thoroughly misplaced here, I really don't know why you would use that word unless English wasn't your 1st language.
Not all sociopaths kill kittens, but theyre all violent. Not that im saying your a sociopath, its pretty obvious you arent. Hell, even being violent doesnt always mean killing and maiming, it means using unnecessary and unwarrented physical force. Though your still using it in the same sentence as "loving and playfull", though I think I have enough to figure out what you mean.IrisEver said:Yeah, I don't seem to be getting what I mean over in a way people can grasp. I'll try again.excentric22 said:there is a HUGE differance between playfighting and being violent. Your first post almost makes you sound sociopathic. maybe pick your words better....they dont match what you seem to be trying to describe
I like playfighting.
I'm quite hot tempered.
Yes, I would call myself quite violent. But please see the 'I dont wants' above. I'm talking about it being mutual. A relationship dynamic. Not an abuse relationship at all. Loving, playful if you will.
I don't want to mother anyone.
I dont think I'm a sociopath, as I do care for the people close to me. But I am far from passive, and do like a certain dynamic in a relationship. Men get closer to this relationship dynamic when it's two men together - the playfighting, the good-natured "violence" interaction and talk. But when it comes to women, men seem to expect something entirely different. And if we do like that sort of 'violent' relationship dynamic or have that sort of personality, we're considered "bitches". Stand up for ourselves, we're considered the same. I was just wondering -why-?
I think I do have a knack of offending people, yes.Lead Herring said:Maybe you've misdiagnosed the problem here. Maybe it's not that men are put off by your confidence but rather you may have a knack for offending people. While it's true that you shouldn't try to be someone you're not to please someone your interested in, sometimes you do need to change certain mannerisms in order for a relationship to work (eg, an easygoing but lazy guy may have to become more proactive, but he shouldn't have to act aggressive to please his significant other.)
On the other hand, it could just be that your going after the wrong guys, especially if you've drawn this conclusion from the results of one or two dates-gone-wrong. While you are correct that a lot of guys dislike a strong willed girl, I've heard enough opinions to suggest that just as many admire that trait in a woman. My guess is that less confidant guys feel intimidated by stronger willed girls, and confidence is not a trait typified by geeks. You see, your statement about guys liking strong women in video games doesn't really say much as, in a videogame, you interact with them through an idealized male protagonist (I'm sure the Grey Warden never has to deal with sweaty palms or acne).
Hope that helps.
I'm pretty certain that's not the kind of 'playfighting' she's talking about.Boris Goodenough said:Here's an idea, go to a BDSM club if you're old enough, I am more than sure you could find someone who would not only accept your nature but have it as a fetish.
This is NOT a fetish, and certainly not a sexual one. I am not wanting to be a leather clad dominatrix. Sex is a different issue. Again, this is about a relationship as a whole. Interaction, bonding, natures.Boris Goodenough said:Here's an idea, go to a BDSM club if you're old enough, I am more than sure you could find someone who would not only accept your nature but have it as a fetish.
I didn't say it was a fetish for you, I meant that it would be for your partner. Also it's not everyone who is into the whole leather and bullwhip thing, there are various degress of it.IrisEver said:This is NOT a fetish, and certainly not a sexual one. I am not wanting to be a leather clad dominatrix. Sex is a different issue. Again, this is about a relationship as a whole. Interaction, bonding, natures.
I actually tried forming a relationship with a fetishist. It was so far from what I wanted. We wouldn't have pleased each other.
Well there should be more than just a handful of those out there, Britain (well the England part anyway) is the most compact ("real") country out there when it comes to people.Hagi said:I'm pretty certain that's not the kind of 'playfighting' she's talking about.
Sounds to me like she's looking for someone she can playfully call an ass-hole, who won't be offended and will call her a ***** right back.
No. Not what I'm talking about. But again, thanks for the insight.Shark Wrangler said:Dated a women that said the same thing as you and she turned out to be a psycho. Even though you are probably not dangerous, most men don't like it for very good reasons. The simple fact is that men don't want to argue with women when their in public. Every man will tell you that arguing with a women when their is people around is like walking around naked. Remember my ex girlfriend being aggressive and I had no problem with it at all. Man did she change when people where around. Oh course she had no manners either and saw her aggression as some form of power. Remember her asking me right in front of my friends if we could go in the back and screw real quick. Got to say that not only is that rude to do in front of people, but it is in bad taste. Oh course she saw it as empowering. Not empowering anything, your just being a jackass and being proud of it doesn't help things.
oh.IrisEver said:This is NOT a fetish, and certainly not a sexual one. I am not wanting to be a leather clad dominatrix. Sex is a different issue.