My guess of the joke was "Tim Burton will always give Jonny Depp a big part in his movies, no matter what his character's role was in the source material".
Such a same. There's nothing like the first time when you hear a heart-broken Romeo cry into the sky: "Then I defy you stars!"Fat_Hippo said:Your school may have been different, but we read at least a dozen plays, and only ever saw one live, and maybe watched 2 of them on video.Farther than stars said:Reading a play?! Reading a play?! What's next? Playing a novel? Listening to a painting? Plays are watched, not read, or you should not bother appreciating them at all!
I'm not saying all of these work very well in the written form. In fact, it may explain part my disdain for most classical dramas. But it's also a regular part of most literary education. Unfortunately, appreciation doesn't always figure into it.
That is how I understood it. Godot himself would be a mix of The Mad Hatter and Jack Sparrow. And the only time he would not be on screen would be for several appearances of Helena Bonham Carter.bificommander said:My guess of the joke was "Tim Burton will always give Jonny Depp a big part in his movies, no matter what his character's role was in the source material".
![]()
DVS BSTrD said:Okay I'm lost.
Who's this Johny Deep character?
![]()
Shinsei-J said:Umm, what?
Completely lost here.
[sub]I need a map.[/sub]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waiting_for_GodotNile McMorrow said:The point just flew over my head and appears to be on a flight to Mexico.
In other words...
Ya lost me after Johnny Depp.
Amaror said:I think it may be about the fact that in the play godot never actually shows up, so jonny depp wouldn't actually be in that movie.
I don't think that's funny though.
I read it as "Tim Burton is so mad about crow-barring Johnny Depp into his films that he would do an adaption of Waiting for Godot where Godot actually arrives (played by Depp) and completely takes over the story."cynicalsaint1 said:I know what Waiting for Godot is, but I'm not sure what that has to do with Johnny Depp or Tim Burton ... other than "Haha, Depp never shows up" ... so unless that's the whole joke I feel like I'm missing something here ...
It would be great if it was about toaster face Godot though.Uszi said:*Snip*
Samuel Beckett was once asked about this and said "If Godot was meant to represent God, I'd have called him God. They're waiting for Godot."Helen Jones said:This is a play about the pointlessness of life.
It is mainly about two men, Estragon and Vladmir, who are waiting for a man Godot, a play on the word God.
There are only two other characters, Pozzo, a slave-master, and his slave Lucky. If this seems like a tiny cast it's because it is, it's desolate. Lucky only has one line in the entire play, but this one line (in my version of the text) takes up 3 entire pages, it's complete gibberish.
(Also saw the Ian McKellen version, and I really wish I could find a recording of Lucky's speech, it was brilliant.)
Point is, God(ot) never shows up, Johnny Depp will never get his part. The play ends with them agreeing to leave and not come back, but they freeze, they never exit the stage.
There was also this lovely story that came out-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1277418/Sir-Ian-McKellen-mistaken-tramp-rehearses-play.html
To lighten the mood at the end, McKellen and Roger Rees did a tap dance. Y'all missed out.
no uDVS BSTrD said:Okay Uszi, how long have I been doing this?Uszi said:*Snip*
Uszi, you know me. You know what I'm about.
Uszi, Uszi wat u doin?
Uszi, srsly
Uszi...
STAHP ET!
I have to agree. Especially if everyone else is dressed like it's 1953 and Godot shows up in an electric visor and drinks 17 cups of coffee in two acts.McFazzer said:It would be great if it was about toaster face Godot though.Uszi said:*Snip*
He wasn't God. Beckett once said something to the effect that if he wanted to to be God, he would have said God. Also there are more than 4 characters in the play... there's six, the two messenger boys (usually played by two different, but fairly similar looking, child actors).Helen Jones said:This is a play about the pointlessness of life.
It is mainly about two men, Estragon and Vladmir, who are waiting for a man Godot, a play on the word God.
There are only two other characters, Pozzo, a slave-master, and his slave Lucky. If this seems like a tiny cast it's because it is, it's desolate. Lucky only has one line in the entire play, but this one line (in my version of the text) takes up 3 entire pages, it's complete gibberish.
(Also saw the Ian McKellen version, and I really wish I could find a recording of Lucky's speech, it was brilliant.)
It's a riff on how Tim Burton misses the point of every adaptation he does in order to continue his Johnny Depp obsession (although I'm disappointed you couldn't find a way to shoehorn Helena Bonham Carter in here as well Grey. I mean, Tim Burton always doesShinsei-J said:Umm, what?
Completely lost here.
[sub]I need a map.[/sub]
What artists say about their work and what can be drawn from it can be two very different things.LavaLampBamboo said:Samuel Beckett was once asked about this and said "If Godot was meant to represent God, I'd have called him God. They're waiting for Godot."Helen Jones said:This is a play about the pointlessness of life.
It is mainly about two men, Estragon and Vladmir, who are waiting for a man Godot, a play on the word God.
There are only two other characters, Pozzo, a slave-master, and his slave Lucky. If this seems like a tiny cast it's because it is, it's desolate. Lucky only has one line in the entire play, but this one line (in my version of the text) takes up 3 entire pages, it's complete gibberish.
(Also saw the Ian McKellen version, and I really wish I could find a recording of Lucky's speech, it was brilliant.)
Point is, God(ot) never shows up, Johnny Depp will never get his part. The play ends with them agreeing to leave and not come back, but they freeze, they never exit the stage.
There was also this lovely story that came out-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1277418/Sir-Ian-McKellen-mistaken-tramp-rehearses-play.html
To lighten the mood at the end, McKellen and Roger Rees did a tap dance. Y'all missed out.
I saw this when it was on with McKellen and Patrick Stewart opposite him. It was a really excellent performance and incredibly funny. I highly recommend it.
Have never heard that before (obviously), but thanks for sharing, it's pretty interesting. While clearly from that Godot can't BE God, I do stand that the plays theme of spending a life waiting for something can be linked to God and Christianity, but as a lesser idea rather than a central one.RC1138 said:He wasn't God. Beckett once said something to the effect that if he wanted to to be God, he would have said God. Also there are more than 4 characters in the play... there's six, the two messenger boys (usually played by two different, but fairly similar looking, child actors).