If only we had some sort of standard ratings board that independantly checked games and gave them an appropriate age restriction!Andy Chalk said:"As a family friendly console, Wii must ensure that there are proper checks and a full consultation before games are graded for use by children,"
On one hand I do agree with this. 16 year olds and up won't need a Wii mote to spank each other like in the commercial, or "make out?" with something dangling above them.The Random Paradox said:Finally, somebody who knows what they're talking about.Andy Chalk said:Hall said typical 16-year-olds would find the game's content "beneath them."
On the other hand, here ya go... The game is completely sold as a sexual game, and then giving it a 12+ rating was the game companies ASKING for an outcry. If you show a video of adults spanking each other with a wii-mote down your pants (considering multiple people in the party walk up to each other all sexy, not caring who spanks who), then yeah, you're saying "Hmmmm MIGHT be only for adults"CustomMagnum said:Considering the marketing of that game, I can't exactly blame those parents for going "OMG WTF".
Oh come on. I've played Twister when i was 12 and that lead to my first gf. What's next? Ban Twister because people invade each others "personal space"? Ban bottles because you could spin them? That is so fucking stupid. Heads are blown off left and right in videogames and no one gives a fuck but when people play a, admittedly stupid, movement game or RPG with sexual scenes everyone and their mom freaks the fuck out? In that regard, the UK and USA aren't that different from some countries in the middle east.standokan said:I've got to admit, 12 is waaaaaaaay too low.