No, that only applies to parents buying their kids games they're not old enough for.El Danny said:
A 12 year old is perfectly capable of buying their own games, and thanks to this age rating, they can, legally.
We Dare Gets 12+ Rating, Parents Go Nuts
- Thread starter Andy Chalk
- Start date
A 12 year old is perfectly capable of buying their own games, and thanks to this age rating, they can, legally.
What the hell? This is 12 we're talking about, not 5.Mornelithe said:
When I was 12 I had a paper round which got me the equivalent of about $40 a week, easily enough for some shitty Wii shovelware. I could walk to the store, and I got paid cash, it's really not difficult for a kid to buy a game.
Why? If they've earned it, they can do what they like with it.Mornelithe said:
Hell, I probably spent most of mine on sweets and games, I don't regret that, I was 12.
A 12+ rating is quite stupid on their part, but then again it pales in comparison to how ludicrous the actual game looks like.
Hmm this is interesting because the current rating system is based on what the game renders on screen and in We Dare's case it is two people flying or eating and apple . However its what the game implies that you that is adult since you could just play by pressing the buttons with you hands. So we may seem a change in policy or the way in which games are judged.
To be fair, it is the name of a political party, rather than the word.lacktheknack said:When others learn that Americans have different ways of spelling and it's not the end of the world.WelshDanny said:Correction: Labour MP...
When will Americans learn to spell correctly?
OT: The board is there to set the lower limit, not condone the activity. He explicity said that the game was tame and that the ad was more raunchy than the actual game, he can't make up reasons for giving it an 18 if there aren't any.
When will you learn that yours isn't the only correct spelling in the world?WelshDanny said:Correction: Labour MP...
When will Americans learn to spell correctly?
I don't get it. It looks crap. Speaking as a person who does remember being 16 very clearly, i wouldn't have bought this game then. It just looks ridiculous.
Besides, wasn't "project rub" for DS a 3+?
Besides, wasn't "project rub" for DS a 3+?
But spin the bottle is more sexual than this. The only thing that is even remotely sexual is the spanking. Worse things happen in kid discos.
What the fuck is up with the video? What's with the static noise and the parental code thing?
Besides that, how stupid are these people? The game isn't even being marketed to kids, that's why it shows four adults playing.
Besides that, how stupid are these people? The game isn't even being marketed to kids, that's why it shows four adults playing.
Another example of marketing shooting itself in the foot and giving more ammunition to people who want a totalitarian control system over video games. The ad was likely like they said a exaggeration but still.