Pyro Paul said:This guy thought the same thingimnotparanoid said:I hate traps full stop, poor mousys!
How could anyone harm this
![]()
![]()
Pyro Paul said:This guy thought the same thingimnotparanoid said:I hate traps full stop, poor mousys!
How could anyone harm this
![]()
![]()
No, I said the act of throwing a live mouse stuck on a glue trap when it's injured into the bin is pathetic. An act of blatant cruelty like that, I would consider pathetic. Yeah, of course I was upset over a mouse, I don't agree with torture like that. Forgive me for being human.starkiller212 said:Frankly, trying to call people "pathetic" for this kind of thing and being so upset over a goddamn mouse says a lot more about you than anyone who uses "inhumane" traps.
You're going off an irrelevant tangent here. That there are worse atrocities happening doesn't invalidate the premise of this thread. Using this reasoning, one could tell people to stop caring about a single murder because there are starving children in Africa.starkiller212 said:There's plenty of other problems in the world that are a lot worse than this, so IMO you should put your efforts towards something more useful.
They might not think to the same capacity as we do, but they certainly feel it. Mammalian nervous systems and reactions to pain are very similar.P.S. Stop trying to empathize with animals like "imagine if you were ___". They DON'T feel or think the same way we do so it's a pointless exercise that will make you more upset than you should be over it.
Can insects feel pain?Aeshi said:It's a bit hypocritical that people hate these things but turn a blind eye to fly paper, which does the exact same thing (and on a larger scale to boot!)
Lets go even futher. You know antibiotics? Think of how many billions of bacteria killed every single time they are used.Fargus said:Can insects feel pain?Aeshi said:It's a bit hypocritical that people hate these things but turn a blind eye to fly paper, which does the exact same thing (and on a larger scale to boot!)
I've had cats catch mice and other rodents in the past, and although it's handy, the cats had a tendency to not eat this one organ of the rodents they were killing. It looked kind of like a liver or something, all dark and shiny, and they tended to leave it right on the doorstep. Gross.DuctTapeJedi said:As much as I love kittens, I don't think I could do that. I'm kind of a pansy when it comes to killing things, even bugs and spiders. I only had one mouse loose in my house. He ran and tried to hide in a shoe that was sitting nearby, so I just took it outside, and let him continue to live his life.ravensheart18 said:Yeah, I don't approve of glue traps, unless nothing else is working.
You know I have tried three models of those when I had mice. Damn mice either didn't go in them, or found ways to eat the bait and get out. Maybe I just had smart mice...DuctTapeJedi said:They make humane traps where it doesn't actually kill the mouse, you just let him go outside.
I switched to more traditional snack traps and the mousies started dying.
The 2nd time I had mouse issues a few years ago was coincidentally when I got a new kitten. About the same time the kitty turned 3 or 4 months old the mouse problem just disappeared on its own. Good kitty...crunch crunch crunch.
Seriously, I wouldn't even be able to eat meat if it weren't for the fact that honey mustard chicken is the greatest thing ever.
This. Though, I will say because you (the OP) work in an office and most mice come out once everyone leaves (and I'm sure your management doesnt wnat to pay someone over time to spend all night checking traps just to save mice from agony), that its very hard to do so, so more humane traps should be implemented, even if they are slightly more dangerous (I'm assuming you (the OP) mean the more modern snap trap of course, which are better then the classic stereotypical trap you see in cartoons).Starnerf said:Glue traps are much less dangerous to humans and pets than snap traps or poison. They are pretty cruel to the mice, but if you check them often enough you can prevent that and give them a quicker death.
So? That doesn't mean it's OK do things like torture them.HG131 said:Well, I care about most animals, but mice really don't matter.
Did you hear how they "officially" renamed fish as "sea kittens"? In case people were thinking about taking them seriously.SinisterGehe said:I might start using glue traps just to be an asshole to these damn freaks who value life of a pest more than a humans They were ready to steal my jacket during winter it was -28celcius outside and windy. ( I wear leather jacket, because it was gift from my mother), they would have let everyone die who need an medicine to survive that had been tested on literally lab rat.
These people ain't kind hearted, they are monsters.
They're all in it for the publicity, not the animals. PETA actually used to get things done, but this publicity thing has gone to their head. That's what happens when one group like that gets too much fame and attention.thaluikhain said:Did you hear how they "officially" renamed fish as "sea kittens"? In case people were thinking about taking them seriously.
Oh i more then get your point.Fargus said:Way to miss my point, Paul....
You can rationalise killing them all you want, but attempting to justify what I consider torture is pathetic IMO.
Not true.Fargus said:They might not think to the same capacity as we do, but they certainly feel it. Mammalian nervous systems and reactions to pain are very similar.P.S. Stop trying to empathize with animals like "imagine if you were ___". They DON'T feel or think the same way we do so it's a pointless exercise that will make you more upset than you should be over it.
That has nothing to do with my point at all. Seems like it has flown over your head, again. The problem I see here is that you're using naturalistic fallacy arguments in order to excuse yourself for being unnecessarily cruel to other animals. Yes, nature isn't nice all the time but that's not an excuse to chuck a live mammal into your rubbish bin stuck on a sheet of superglue when the option is there for a mercy kill. You're just deliberately prolonging its misery, it's disgusting.Pyro Paul said:but there is a big problem with your point.
You are Apart of Nature.
and Nature is not all Double rainbows and Bubblegum lollypops.
This has absolutely nothing to do with nature and life being gritty. You're trying to paint such animals as close to objects as possible in order to justify your cruelty towards them. Your justifications for torturing animals are laughable.when ever your done trying to shill your mightier-then-thou routine and realize that Life, and Nature are a lot more gritty and dirty then your ivory towers Feel free to join the Rest of humanity.
What is not true? Are you denying that they feel pain, and deny that mammalian nervous systems are similar? Funny, that... I never said anything about the emotional component we humans take for granted. That said, it has been shown rats get depressed when their cagemate dies - so do dogs when their owner dies. You say all of it is reactionary but don't even consider the fact that something like a rat or a dog can be traumatised by such events and show it through unusual behaviour. They learn from such experiences.Not true.
Pain is also an unpleasant experience, we strive to minimise it. Doing the same for animals because we know it's unpleasant for them too, and sympathise. It's called having empathy. I felt sorry for the animal in my situation because it was in a great amount of pain, and it was unnecessary for the animal to have gone through that. That it might have been a pest, in that context, is entirely irrelevant. The animal is no more or less deserving of a quick dispatch than any other - your arguments seem to imply that it is OK to do something like this simply because they exist.Pain is just a chemical reaction.
it is the subsquent actions which occur because of it that speak tomes of an organism.
Yet none of these things are reasons to torture something to death.Pyro Paul said:By all means, continue to take up your soap box in protest of 'inhumane treatment' of squallor filled pests that spread desiease, pestilence, and death. That consume the flesh of still living beings unable to defend themselves with no remorse or concern. That cause Pain, suffering, and dispare to countless thousands as they breed out of control and dominate local resources forcing many into squallor, poverty, and hunger unable to provide for themselves.
Depression is a physical condition not an emotional one.Fargus said:So you deny that they don't feel pain, and deny that mammalian nervous systems are similar? Funny, that... I never said anything about the emotional component we humans take for granted. That said, it has been shown rats get depressed when their cagemate dies - so do dogs when their owner dies. You say all of it is reactionary but don't even consider the fact that something like a rat or a dog can be traumatised by such events and show it through unusual behaviour. They learn from such experiences.Not true.
Does it now?And the way you kill something, and casually disregard how painful it is on the notion that "nature is cruel" speaks tomes of your personality. Seems like pointless cruelty to animals is your thing, and worse, you're trying to defend it.Pain is just a chemical reaction.
it is the subsquent actions which occur because of it that speak tomes of an organism.