BobDobolina said:
maninahat said:
If people are getting offended by the sort of articles I've read, I tend to see them as either severely lacking in reading comprehension skills to properly digest what has actually being written, or that they doth protest too much.
This.
It's like seeing someone, on overhearing someone talk about changes in the American murder rate, get offended and
demanding to know
why they're being called a murderer.
No bob, this would be like the article saying "Americans are murderers", using the stereoype of the loudmouth gun-toting texan to justify it, and then feigning incredulity when people point out the stereotype being very ill-fitting. The way things are presented is sort of important, and when the entire article is a slanderization of a group of people by use of the grosses stereotype and who's entire purpose is to basically shit on an aspect of identity of many many people, the same people who are suppose to be their audience I might remind you, well, it is a little different then "just talking about murder rates".
You know what might be a more accurate comparison in logic, if not scale? Talking about Black American crime rates while filling the article with disparaging statements about black americans as a general rule of thumb and making plenty of references to watermellon and fried chicken. And then acting like you have here and going "well I wasn't talking about
all black americans, just the ones who actually fit the stereotype, you have no right to get upset, you are just whiny".
Because that above, that is the same sort of bullshit people are decrying.
Oh and since I know you or someone else will try to derail and dismiss if I don't restate the disclaimer here, no, I am not saying gamers' stereotype is the same degree as black american's stereotype, I am saying the articles use the same lack of reasoning, and same pathetic excuse to dismiss those outraged by their tactlessness and needlessly generalizing stereotypes as the example I gave.