Dude. I've been waiting for someone to ask that. I have the answer in photograph form:Tropicaz said:Can anyone tell me the name of the quest where you went into that kind of dreaming state in fallout 3? You went to this weird little suburbia. That quest was awesome.
Thank you It's been bugging me for a while now. That was such a good section of the game. Where is that picture from btw? And dont say just next to Tranquility lane.loc978 said:Dude. I've been waiting for someone to ask that. I have the answer in photograph form:Tropicaz said:Can anyone tell me the name of the quest where you went into that kind of dreaming state in fallout 3? You went to this weird little suburbia. That quest was awesome.
I love the implication of that sign.
Oh, and it's Tranquility Lane, not Dead End.
Reading that makes him seem like incredibly smug, and a person who thinks he knows everything.Elmoth said:J.E. Sawyer is a genius. Read his formsprings for a bit, and I don't see how you might think otherwise.
http://www.formspring.me/JESawyer
A little dead end country road called Tranquility Lane near my property... middle of nowhere, Clackamas county Oregon.Tropicaz said:Thank you It's been bugging me for a while now. That was such a good section of the game. Where is that picture from btw? And dont say just next to Tranquility lane.loc978 said:Dude. I've been waiting for someone to ask that. I have the answer in photograph form:Tropicaz said:Can anyone tell me the name of the quest where you went into that kind of dreaming state in fallout 3? You went to this weird little suburbia. That quest was awesome.
I love the implication of that sign.
Oh, and it's Tranquility Lane, not Dead End.
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait,Isshiresshi said:Fallout 3 is a lot more "humanity is suffering from nuclear war and everything has gone to hell"-atmosphere and the story too is more focused on it as well, where New Vegas has a "did not get hit near as hard with nukes like everywhere else"-background. The story makes a lot more sense from the start to finish then New Vegas does.
They both play like each other. No different in the graphic or mechanics from the two games.
Fallout 3 has some interesting things as well as New Vegas so I think you should try and make it work so you can try it out!
I really don't care that much about westerns at all. Don't like John Wayne that much, and the few westerns I have seen(The Unforgiven and 3:10 to Yuma) I liked for reasons beyond the western genre. On the other side of the spectrum I absolutely love the idea of post apocalyptic worlds. I played the fallout games in my youth, I've donated for a new Wasteland game, I read post apocalyptic books(A canticle for Leibowitz, Anthem, The machine stops, that one Philip K Dick short story about a post nuclear apocalypse society living under ground while machines fight the war above) and intend to write a PA book myself.Spectrum_Prez said:Fallout 3 did post-apocalyptic a lot better than FNV. Half the built-in appeal of FNV was the cowboy theme; if you liked Westerns, the setting would probably appeal to you more than FO3's nuked-out feel.
Yes, in fact, saying true things in a certain way is what 90% of smugness is about. Being smug is knowing you are right, and then rubbing it in other people's faces.Elmoth said:Well is it smug to say things that are true?
Funny because..... most of the things people say Todd lied about... were reallyAnthraxus said:I wouldn't even bring up lies when we all know your favorite is one of the biggest liars of them all.
Honestly, if it does anything better then I either didn't notice or it wasn't important. New Vegas is the better game by far.Reincarnatedwolfgod said:What does fallout 3 do better then fallout new vegas?
Its the tone of his words, after reading through a lot of the stuff he posted there he just seems very stuck up.Elmoth said:How is he rubbing it in people's faces, exactly?
wooh....did i punch you in the face as a child? where is this hostility coming from? The reason why it matters at all is that most of the files were on the disk when it came out, so people could pick them up and twiddle with them as they pleased, it's not like they weren't there to begin with. And yes, they weren't restoring everything, i read that, but that still changes...what exactly? big deal if EVERY last nook and cranny didn't get put back in, they at least tried and made a ton of things smoothed out for everyone to enjoy, what's to hate?malestrithe said:Regardless of the justification that's going around, the version that was released is the version you were meant to play. There was more planned, but frankly who give a shit? What matters is what is released.gmaverick019 said:so did you learn all this from cut files...? or where did you read up on this? i'd like to read it myself if you remember.
and that is the exact reason why i love kotor 2, the restoration patch brought back nearly everything and boy is that a sweet fucking game to plow through when most of the content is there that was originally planned to be. (curious, are they trying to restore that for new vegas at all? some of those would be sweet)
Also, if you read the notes on the restoration project, the people making it said that they were not restoring everything. they were restoring only things that feel like they belong to the game and ignoring stuff that did not fit. If it was a true restoration, everything gets put back in. In other words their vision of KotOR 2 is what you are getting. They did not make the game, they do not get to say what fits.
how is it a broken argument? in the long term, it is fixable, while a bad game is not, you have to start from scratch. how is that an idiotic compromise?SajuukKhar said:To bad Obsidian never fixes their bugs... leaving their games with constant CTDs, and broken quests to such an extent that Bethesda's games look stable.Dr. McD said:As for bugs, they can be fixed, bad writing, boring atmosphere, illogical plot, black and white morality, and boring characters can not.
Writing the best book ever means nothing if you can't get it printed on a book that doesn't dissolve after 3 minutes.
And sure bugs CAN be fixed, but a lot of things CAN happen, but that doesn't mean they actually will happen.
It really seems like the people who use the argument you just made don't actually think it through, because if they actually did, they would realize how idiotic and broken of an argument it is, especially in Obsidian's case.
*captcha*
Face the music
What people need to do when it comes to Obsidian.