Well, seemed like plausible new info to meDid you mean to post this in the "Share something that makes you smile" thread?
Well, seemed like plausible new info to meDid you mean to post this in the "Share something that makes you smile" thread?
Oh, you're not on FB I take it? Been mentioned a lot.Carl Weathers Died?!?!?!
Oh, you're not on FB I take it? Been mentioned a lot.
References: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8M2z... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGUte... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idwKH... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoTAL... Touchstone, L. A. (2022). Nick Holonyak Jr. University of Illinois. - https://ve42.co/Touchstone2022 Perry, T. S. (1995). The Unsung Inventor. IEEE Spectrum. - https://ve42.co/Perry1995 Chabay, R. & Sherwood, B. (2011). Matter & interactions (4th ed.), S2: Semiconductors. Wiley. - https://ve42.co/ChabaySherwood How MOCVD Works via Aixtron - https://ve42.co/MOCVD Vangala, S. R., et al. (2019). Epitaxial growth of ZnSe on GaAs. Journal of Crystal Growth. - https://ve42.co/Vangala2019 Nakamura, S. (1991). GaN Growth Using GaN Buffer Layer. JJAP. - https://ve42.co/Nakamura3rd1991 Amano, H., et al. (1989). P-Type Conduction in Mg-Doped GaN w/ LEEBI. JJAP. - https://ve42.co/Amano1989 Huang, M., et al. (2021). Defects in Mg–H‐Codoped GaN. Physica Status Solidi. - https://ve42.co/Huang2021 Schubert, E. F. (2006). Light Emitting Diodes, Ch 4: LED basics. Cambridge University Press. - https://ve42.co/RPI-LEDs Kitada, C. (2001). Blue About Japan. Japan Inc. - https://ve42.co/Kitada2001 Whitaker, T. (2002). Nakamura loses Nichia patent battle. Optics.org. - https://ve42.co/NichiaSales3 Pirates Osaka. (2014). Nakamura awarded Nobel Prize in Physics. Hatena Blog. - https://ve42.co/NichiaSales1 Growth Bozu via Twitter. - https://ve42.co/NichiaSales2 Rose, J. (2014). Blue LEDs – Filling the world with new light. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. - https://ve42.co/Rose2014 Pattison, P. M., et al. (2017). LED lighting efficacy. Comptes Rendus Physique. - https://ve42.co/Pattison2017 Electricity pricing via EIA - https://ve42.co/ElectricityPricing Lane, K., et al. (2023). Lighting. IEA. - https://ve42.co/LightingIEA LED Footprint via The Climate Group - https://ve42.co/ClimateGroupLED Nichia’s History via Nichia - https://ve42.co/NichiaHistory Shuji Nakamura via Wikipedia - https://ve42.co/NakamuraWiki Images & Video: Lighting the World via UCTVInsight on YouTube - https://ve42.co/UCTVep2 & https://ve42.co/UCTVep3 Palo Alto Times 1971 Article via Newspapers.com - https://ve42.co/Newspapers Nick Holonyak, Jr. and the LED via UIUC on YouTube - https://ve42.co/HolonyakIllinois The Original Blue LED via Science History Institute on YouTube - https://ve42.co/OGBlueLED Maxfield, M. (2022). Compound Semiconductors. EE Journal. - https://ve42.co/Maxfield2022 M. Stutzmann, et al. (2001). Playing with Polarity. pss (b). - https://ve42.co/Stutzman2001 Isamu Akasaki in 1995 via Andrey Nikolaev on YouTube - https://ve42.co/AsakiNikolaev Pioneer TX-610 Stereo Tuner via Ian Marino on YouTube - https://ve42.co/StereoMarino Shuji Nakamura via EPO on YouTube - https://ve42.co/NakamuraEPO Nichia Campus via Nichia on LinkedIn - https://ve42.co/NichiaHQ Nichia via TDElektronik on YouTube - https://ve42.co/NichiaTDE Violeds Sterilization of COVID-19 via Seoul Viosys - https://ve42.co/SterilizationUV
Ok maybe 'Under the Skin' wasn't A24, but it might as fckin well be, all the traits are there!Pearson's next film role will be in A24's A Different Man, which is set to have its world premiere at the Sundance Film Festival in 2024 in the Premieres section. He will star alongside Sebastian Stan and Renate Reinsve.
To be fair, space exploration is just expensive and risky enough that going to the same planet or moon every time you can, without the very real expectation of learning something new or valuable, doesn't make much fiduciary sense. I mean if 8 new restaurants were available in your city, could you reasonably justify spending exorbitant amounts going to the same restaurant on your block then saying you've substantially expanded the culinary knowledge of your wider area? Could you imagine if we sent astronauts to our moon every time we had the budget for it, and when the inexorable accident happens, and we lose a crew of people, only having another handful of moon rocks to show for it?Moon landing: US firm Intuitive Machines makes historic touchdown - BBC News
Intuitive Machines completes the first ever lunar touchdown by a privately built spacecraft.www.bbc.com
Weird. We’ve sent stuff to Pluto and beyond but waited over half a century to send another thing to the moon. I guess NASA got bored of something.
Well yes, there’s certainly *all of that* and I sure as hell won’t disagree. But speaking strictly of space exploration, it’s kinda funny how the astronomical costs of it didn’t stop NASA from going to the same place what, half a dozen times in a very short span of time, back when technology was nowhere near what it has become since. Then we send stuff to Mars, and a few other places that very likely have any benefit to the human condition on earth. The logic to at all is very odd to me, but of course what else can be expected when *see your reply*.To be fair, space exploration is just expensive and risky enough that going to the same planet or moon every time you can, without the very real expectation of learning something new or valuable, doesn't make much fiduciary sense. I mean if 8 new restaurants were available in your city, could you reasonably justify spending exorbitant amounts going to the same restaurant on your block then saying you've substantially expanded the culinary knowledge of your wider area? Could you imagine if we sent astronauts to our moon every time we had the budget for it, and when the inexorable accident happens, and we lose a crew of people, only having another handful of moon rocks to show for it?
Don't get me wrong, in terms of space exploration, I'm personally of the mindset that we've got enough shit to fix down here on Earth, that the curiosities of distant heavenly bodies should be relegated to a hobby and not international efforts and resources. We're spending BILLIONS to peek at planets we can't reasonable reach in any substantial way, yet, I can walk out my front door and see dozens of people for whom a $500 medical deductible could be financially crippling. Me thinks our priorities might be a bit upside-down; "why are we just now returning to the moon?" I'd ask why did we ever bother in the first place let alone going again no matter how many years later. We're surrounded by war, poverty, famine, insufficient healthcare, etc.; who gives a shit about some billionaires who'd rather spend their wealth staring into space, jerking each other off while the world around them burns?
(Sorry, got a bit rant-y there...)